AI technologies are affecting our civil liberties as never before. Ensuring that AI serves people, not power, starts with cutting through the hype. AI technologies are not magic wands—they are general-purpose tools. If we want to regulate those technologies to reduce harms without shutting down benefits, we have to focus on who uses AI, what products they use, and how they use them.
Where we see potential benefits, like improving weather forecasting, facilitating medical research, identifying systemic bias, or fostering accessibility, we work to ensure those benefits can be realized.
Where we see potential harms, we consider the practical and legal tools we already have, like pressure campaigns, privacy lawsuits, and transparency measures. If we need new tools, we should create protections tailored to the actual problem—not just to the latest outrage. For example, if policymakers are worried about AI accelerating systemic privacy violations, they should enact real and comprehensive privacy legislation that covers all corporate surveillance and data use, and close the data broker loophole to limit government surveillance.
And to keep the window open for a better future, we fight for a competitive innovation environment. For example, if we want AI models that don’t replicate existing social and political biases, we need to make enough space for new players to build them, and avoid giving today’s giants the power to block future competitors from offering us a better tool or product.
In research labs, conference rooms, courtrooms, and legislatures, people are making decisions that will determine who AI serves and how. EFF works to ensure those decisions support freedom, justice and future innovation.
Artificial Intelligence Highlights
Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and the Fight for User Rights: 2025 in Review
Automated Moderation Is Here to Stay—Accountability Must Keep Pace
This post is part 2 in a series about automated content moderation. Read the first post here.When whistleblower Frances Haugen leaked a set of documents from Meta in 2020, among the revelations was a jarring statistic: The company’s algorithms designed to detect terrorist content incorrectly deleted nonviolent Arabic-language...









