March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Let's tell Congress: quit putting off patent reform. Pass the VENUE Act. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

May 4 @ 3:42pm

Our Stupid Patent of the Month award goes to a company that's been suing VoIP providers over speech recognition. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

May 4 @ 2:20pm

As soon as one smart cow figures out how to open the latch, it doesn’t matter how high the fence is. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

May 4 @ 1:48pm
JavaScript license information