March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Congress needs to hear from you about how bad the TPP will be for digital rights. If you're in the US, take action: https://eff.org/notpp

Feb 8 @ 5:45pm

EFF co-founder John Perry Barlow looks back on the 20 years since "A Declaration Of Independence of Cyberspace" https://freedom.press/blog/20...

Feb 8 @ 4:23pm

The TPP isn't just about international trade, it would regulate what you can do on and off the Internet: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Feb 8 @ 3:14pm
JavaScript license information