March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.

Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Trade deals like TISA are a poor fit to deal with Internet principles like safe harbors, that go beyond economics.

Oct 25 @ 9:24am

More Internet rules in secret treaties: the good and the bad of data flows and platform safe harbors in TISA.

Oct 24 @ 3:50pm

It's crucial that we pass an open access law before the White House administration changes. #OAWeek

Oct 24 @ 3:22pm
JavaScript license information