March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Want to support privacy, security, access to knowledge & culture? Let others promoting digital rights show you how https://eff.org/2016-08-EFA

Aug 24 @ 5:10pm

Baltimore police are using secret real-time aerial surveillance. Bloomberg reports.
https://www.bloomberg.com/fea...

Aug 24 @ 4:23pm

California judge issues contempt warrant for the Riverside DA behind a fifth of all US wiretaps. http://www.desertsun.com/stor...

Aug 24 @ 4:02pm
JavaScript license information