Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie

EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology ("CDT") have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to crack down on warrantless searches of cell phones, arguing in two cases before the court that changing technology demands new guidelines for when the data on someone’s phone can be accessed and reviewed by investigators. 

The amicus briefs were filed in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie.  In both cases, after arresting a suspect, law enforcement officers searched the arrestee’s cell phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge.  Historically, police have been allowed some searches “incident to arrest” in order to protect officers’ safety and preserve evidence.  However, EFF and CDT argue that once a cell phone has been seized, the police need a search warrant to search the data on the phone.

In June 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the search incident to arrest exception does not extend to a cell phone and that police need to get a search warrant in order to search an arrestee's phone after arrest.

Case status: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Hundreds attend EFA launch events in 9 cities across the U.S. this month: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 7:12pm

Voicemail-to-text services have been around since at least 2001. Why was a patent for them issued in 2006? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 9:12am

Learn about Rule 41, the scary new route the government could use to hack your computer: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 8:48am
JavaScript license information