March 10, 2005 | By Kurt Opsahl

"Yes, They're Still Journalists"

While we await the Santa Clara County Court's ruling on the online journalists' motion for a protective order in Apple v. Does, the San Jose Mercury News carries the "ruling" from the Fourth Estate: "Yes, they're still journalists":

The debate is not about who gets bragging rights to ink-stained wretchdom. It is about who is shielded under an important law that allows journalists to keep their sources confidential. The law is essential to a journalist's ability to gather information while protecting whistle-blowers inside government, corporations or other organizations. Ultimately, it's essential to a free press.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Don't let the FBI relieve itself of privacy obligations for its biometrics database. Add your name to fight back. https://act.eff.org/action/no...

Jun 29 @ 4:48pm

Thanks to @wtfpod for matching donations to EFF in June. One more day to donate! https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jun 29 @ 3:52pm

ACLU explains how big data and algorithms can be discriminatory—and why the CFAA shouldn't prevent research on them. https://www.aclu.org/blog/spe...

Jun 29 @ 2:40pm
JavaScript license information