March 10, 2005 | By Kurt Opsahl

"Yes, They're Still Journalists"

While we await the Santa Clara County Court's ruling on the online journalists' motion for a protective order in Apple v. Does, the San Jose Mercury News carries the "ruling" from the Fourth Estate: "Yes, they're still journalists":

The debate is not about who gets bragging rights to ink-stained wretchdom. It is about who is shielded under an important law that allows journalists to keep their sources confidential. The law is essential to a journalist's ability to gather information while protecting whistle-blowers inside government, corporations or other organizations. Ultimately, it's essential to a free press.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Five steps for librarians to protect patron privacy, in a new guide from @flexlibris. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/...

Jul 27 @ 3:55pm

Excited about the... big games? The bullies in charge don't want you to tweet about it! https://www.techdirt.com/arti...

Jul 27 @ 2:54pm

Success! @NancyPelosi promises to oppose the TPP. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jul 27 @ 1:54pm
JavaScript license information