March 10, 2005 | By Kurt Opsahl

"Yes, They're Still Journalists"

While we await the Santa Clara County Court's ruling on the online journalists' motion for a protective order in Apple v. Does, the San Jose Mercury News carries the "ruling" from the Fourth Estate: "Yes, they're still journalists":

The debate is not about who gets bragging rights to ink-stained wretchdom. It is about who is shielded under an important law that allows journalists to keep their sources confidential. The law is essential to a journalist's ability to gather information while protecting whistle-blowers inside government, corporations or other organizations. Ultimately, it's essential to a free press.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

A proposed Rhode Island measure would double down on the CFAA's faults: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

May 25 @ 10:24pm

Important report from The Guardian on how copyright takedowns are used for online censorship. https://www.theguardian.com/t...

May 25 @ 6:36pm

Advertisers using smartphone geo-fencing to target anti-abortion ads directly at people in clinics. https://rewire.news/article/2...

May 25 @ 4:09pm
JavaScript license information