March 10, 2005 | By Kurt Opsahl

"Yes, They're Still Journalists"

While we await the Santa Clara County Court's ruling on the online journalists' motion for a protective order in Apple v. Does, the San Jose Mercury News carries the "ruling" from the Fourth Estate: "Yes, they're still journalists":

The debate is not about who gets bragging rights to ink-stained wretchdom. It is about who is shielded under an important law that allows journalists to keep their sources confidential. The law is essential to a journalist's ability to gather information while protecting whistle-blowers inside government, corporations or other organizations. Ultimately, it's essential to a free press.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The new CIA director has a troubling record on privacy and surveillance
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jan 24 @ 4:43pm

Limits on abstract patents have helped the software industry to thrive. The Patent Office should not undermine them. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jan 24 @ 4:10pm

Show your support for global open access before Diego Gomez's final hearing tomorrow. #StandWithDiego https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jan 24 @ 1:53pm
JavaScript license information