Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie

EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology ("CDT") have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to crack down on warrantless searches of cell phones, arguing in two cases before the court that changing technology demands new guidelines for when the data on someone’s phone can be accessed and reviewed by investigators. 

The amicus briefs were filed in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie.  In both cases, after arresting a suspect, law enforcement officers searched the arrestee’s cell phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge.  Historically, police have been allowed some searches “incident to arrest” in order to protect officers’ safety and preserve evidence.  However, EFF and CDT argue that once a cell phone has been seized, the police need a search warrant to search the data on the phone.

In June 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the search incident to arrest exception does not extend to a cell phone and that police need to get a search warrant in order to search an arrestee's phone after arrest.

Case status: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

We celebrate MLK today, 50 years after FBI plotted to undermine him. Will surveillance be politicized again? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jan 16 @ 3:12pm

To #ReclaimMLK, learn FBI's role suppressing the civil rights movement. Could COINTELPRO happen again under Trump? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Jan 16 @ 11:39am

For #CopyrightWeek, @ARLpolicy addresses the impact of overly long copyright terms on the public domain. http://policynotes.arl.org/?p...

Jan 16 @ 10:49am
JavaScript license information