In re Telephone Info

When the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco applied for an order to obtain historical cell site records, federal magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins wondered why the government did not believe it needed to apply for a search warrant to get this detailed location information of which cell phone towers a particular phone connects to. After the government explained why it did not believe it needed a search warrant, Judge Cousins invited the San Francisco Federal Defender to file a response. 

EFF filed an amicus brief in support of the Federal Defender's argument that the government needed to use a search warrant to obtain historical cell site data. Our amicus brief argues there is a growing societal recognition that it is reasonable to expect privacy in cell phone data that reveals a person's location, as reflected by a growing number of state courts and legislatures requiring law enforcement use a search warrant to obtain this sensitive information. Our amicus brief also notes the California constitution specifically treats telephone records as private.

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

A report by @caparsons on how unaccountable telecom practices and policies threaten Canadians: https://eff.org/r.bth6

May 27 @ 4:16pm

Heard of TPP or TTIP? TISA is another trade agreement making rules for the Internet, just as secretive but bigger: https://eff.org/r.95nc

May 27 @ 3:59pm

In San Francisco? Join EFF Saturday for a panel on art & surveillance as part of the SF International Arts Festival. https://eff.org/r.sicm

May 27 @ 3:55pm
JavaScript license information