CDA230

Gucci America, Inc. v. Hall & Associates, 135 F. Supp. 2d 409 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

Type of online publisher: 
Mindspring Enterprises, Internet Service Provider and Web host
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Hosting trademark infringer's website after being notified of infringing content
CDA § 230 applicable?: 
No

Mindspring hosted a website that infringed Gucci's trademark. They were notified multiple times by Gucci that the site was infringing but never took any action against the site. Gucci then sued the site owner for infringement and the web host for contributory trademark infringement. The court held that Section 230(e)(2), which states that the law should not be used to either expand or limit existing intellectual property law, meant that CDA 230 does not provide any protection against trademark infringement claims.

Court Opinion Document: 
Jurisdiction: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Tomorrow at @sfiaf in San Francisco, join EFF for "Edward Snowden Revelations and the Public Right to Know." https://eff.org/r.v9n2

May 29 @ 4:33pm

EFF supporters get 20% off registration for @ISSALA's Information Security #Summit7 next week: https://eff.org/r.s2qt

May 29 @ 1:36pm

Higher max sentences for "material support" won't prevent terrorism—but will chill First Amendment rights. https://eff.org/r.x49r

May 29 @ 1:19pm
JavaScript license information