Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie

EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology ("CDT") have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to crack down on warrantless searches of cell phones, arguing in two cases before the court that changing technology demands new guidelines for when the data on someone’s phone can be accessed and reviewed by investigators. 

The amicus briefs were filed in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie.  In both cases, after arresting a suspect, law enforcement officers searched the arrestee’s cell phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge.  Historically, police have been allowed some searches “incident to arrest” in order to protect officers’ safety and preserve evidence.  However, EFF and CDT argue that once a cell phone has been seized, the police need a search warrant to search the data on the phone.

In June 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the search incident to arrest exception does not extend to a cell phone and that police need to get a search warrant in order to search an arrestee's phone after arrest.

Case status: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The British are coming! One, if by land, two, if by a mandated backdoor in end-to-end crypto. https://eff.org/r.xwry

May 28 @ 2:40pm

EFF strongly objects to the US proposed Wassenaar implementation. We're drafting comments and you should too! https://eff.org/r.sg5g

May 28 @ 12:21pm

There's just 3 days, 9 hours, and 45 minutes until Section 215 of the Patriot Act sunsets. Time to call Congress: https://eff.org/r.88yz 

May 28 @ 11:14am
JavaScript license information