May 3, 2006 | By Derek Slater

Listen To The Apple v. Does Oral Arguments

On April 20, EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl argued the critical issues in Apple v. Does before a San Jose, California appeals court, telling a panel of three judges that denying confidential source protection to journalists -- whether online or offline -- would deliver a dangerous blow to all media. The judges hearing the arguments asked tough questions and seemed to understand the high stakes for free speech in this case, and we are looking forward to their decision.

Now you can hear the arguments for yourself. The audio transcript is available in mp3 or ogg formats here. EFF breaks down its arguments in the opening, and the incisive questioning of Apple and its supporter Intel starts around 25 minutes in.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Ad networks helped company track Iowa caucas-goers via their mobile phones, explains @kashhill:
http://fusion.net/story/26810...

Feb 12 @ 5:02pm

After a year of pressure from EFF, the California Attorney General agrees to stop skirting open meeting rules. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Feb 12 @ 4:05pm

70 years ago, these six women became programmers on the first ever electronic general-purpose computer: http://www.phillyvoice.com/70...

Feb 12 @ 3:54pm
JavaScript license information