Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie

EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology ("CDT") have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to crack down on warrantless searches of cell phones, arguing in two cases before the court that changing technology demands new guidelines for when the data on someone’s phone can be accessed and reviewed by investigators. 

The amicus briefs were filed in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie.  In both cases, after arresting a suspect, law enforcement officers searched the arrestee’s cell phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge.  Historically, police have been allowed some searches “incident to arrest” in order to protect officers’ safety and preserve evidence.  However, EFF and CDT argue that once a cell phone has been seized, the police need a search warrant to search the data on the phone.

In June 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the search incident to arrest exception does not extend to a cell phone and that police need to get a search warrant in order to search an arrestee's phone after arrest.

Case status: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Today, open source advocate Bassel Khartabil spends his 34th birthday in jail. Syria must #freebassel: https://eff.org/r.effn

May 22 @ 4:25pm

If you're in the SF Bay Area, join us tomorrow in Oakland for a privacy and security workshop: https://eff.org/r.50f7

May 22 @ 4:03pm

The Great Firewall is now blocking access to all of Chinese Wikipedia: https://eff.org/r.tgv

May 22 @ 3:49pm
JavaScript license information