Skip to main content

Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com

Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com

EFF the Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP) and Public Citizen have urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to consider the critical First Amendment questions at issue in a case asserting "hot news misappropriation" -- a doctrine that a federal court used to put time limit restrictions on the reporting of facts.

The defendant in the case TheFlyOnTheWall.com had gathered stock recommendations from investment banking firms like Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers and reported them on its website. The firms sued TheFlyOnTheWall.com claiming that the information was "hot news" and the website was free-riding on the firms' work in creating the recommendations. A federal court agreed with the investment banks and ordered TheFlyOnTheWall.com to delay reporting of the information for two hours after the reports are released.

Applying heightened First Amendment scrutiny is especially important now as the Internet is increasingly allowing Americans to publicly gather share and comment on the news of the day. Misuse of the "hot news" doctrine could stifle this extraordinary growth of free expression.

JavaScript license information