Skip to main content
Privacy’s Defender: My Thirty-Year Fight Against Digital Surveillance

Legal Analysis

Legal Analysis

Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating Competition

This is the third in a series of posts about the proposed Google Book Search settlement.Now that we've described the proposed settlement agreement's biggest potential upside for the public—expanded online access to books, particularly out-of-print books—that benefit must be weighed against the potential down-sides. On that score, the settlement's...

Google Book Search Settlement Revised: No Reader Privacy Added

Late Friday night the parties to the Google Book Search class action submitted a revised settlement agreement to the federal court in New York that is hearing the case.Unfortunately, the parties did not add any reader privacy protections. The only nominal change was that they formally confirmed a position...

Privacy issue banner, a colorful graphical representation of a padlock

New York Court Scores Over Oregon In Recent Email Privacy Opinions

Last week, two new district court opinions took opposing views on the question of whether the Fourth Amendment protects stored email. One of the cases easily adopted the prevailing view that the Constitution protects electronic communications, while the other ignored existing U.S. Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent to find...

EFF Urges Court to Ensure Fairness in Google Book Search Amendment Process

EFF today led a coalition of authors, publishers, companies and nonprofit organizations in sending a letter to the judge overseeing the Google Book Search settlement urging the Court to ensure that those concerned about the settlement receive adequate notice of, and have sufficient time to study...

A person holding a megaphone that another person speaks through

Cook County Sheriff Loses Craigslist "Erotic Services" Ads Case

Yesterday, a federal court tossed a lawsuit against craigslist over erotic advertisements. In March, Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart alleged that craigslist was liable for the illegal ads posted by its users in its "erotic services" (now "adult services") category. As craigslist argued in their motion for judgment...

Court Rules That Phones Ringing in Public Don't Infringe Copyright

As we reported in June, ASCAP believes that when your cell phone's musical ringtone sounds in a public place, you're infringing copyright. A federal court yesterday firmly rejected that argument, ruling that "when a ringtone plays on a cellular telephone, even when that occurs in public, the user...

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Legal Analysis

Back to top

JavaScript license information