Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating Censorship
This is the fifth in a series of posts about the proposed Google Book Search settlement.As we've explained in earlier posts, when it comes to evaluating the proposed Google Books settlement, the principal potential benefit to the public (increased access to books online) must be weighed against the potential...
Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating Privacy
This is the fourth in a series of posts about the proposed Google Book Search settlement.We have now examined the chief promised benefit (increased public access) of the proposed Google Books settlement, as well as one of the chief potential drawbacks (impaired competition). Another down-side to the proposed...
Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating Competition
This is the third in a series of posts about the proposed Google Book Search settlement.Now that we've described the proposed settlement agreement's biggest potential upside for the public—expanded online access to books, particularly out-of-print books—that benefit must be weighed against the potential down-sides. On that score, the settlement's...
Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating Access
This is the second in a series of posts about the proposed Google Book Search settlement.The Potential Upside: Enhanced Public AccessFrom the public's point of view, unprecedented public access to books is the chief benefit promised by the revised proposed settlement (aka Settlement 2.0) of the Google Book Search...
Google Books Settlement 2.0: Evaluating the Pros and Cons
This is the first in a series of posts evaluating the proposed Google Book Search settlement.When it announced its Book Search project in 2004, Google set for itself an inspiring and noble goal. In the words of Google CEO Eric Schmidt, "Imagine yourself at your computer and, in less...
Google Book Search Settlement Revised: No Reader Privacy Added
Late Friday night the parties to the Google Book Search class action submitted a revised settlement agreement to the federal court in New York that is hearing the case.Unfortunately, the parties did not add any reader privacy protections. The only nominal change was that they formally confirmed a position...
New York Court Scores Over Oregon In Recent Email Privacy Opinions
Last week, two new district court opinions took opposing views on the question of whether the Fourth Amendment protects stored email. One of the cases easily adopted the prevailing view that the Constitution protects electronic communications, while the other ignored existing U.S. Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent to find...
EFF Urges Court to Ensure Fairness in Google Book Search Amendment Process
EFF today led a coalition of authors, publishers, companies and nonprofit organizations in sending a letter to the judge overseeing the Google Book Search settlement urging the Court to ensure that those concerned about the settlement receive adequate notice of, and have sufficient time to study...
Cook County Sheriff Loses Craigslist "Erotic Services" Ads Case
Yesterday, a federal court tossed a lawsuit against craigslist over erotic advertisements. In March, Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart alleged that craigslist was liable for the illegal ads posted by its users in its "erotic services" (now "adult services") category. As craigslist argued in their motion for judgment...
Court Rules That Phones Ringing in Public Don't Infringe Copyright
As we reported in June, ASCAP believes that when your cell phone's musical ringtone sounds in a public place, you're infringing copyright. A federal court yesterday firmly rejected that argument, ruling that "when a ringtone plays on a cellular telephone, even when that occurs in public, the user...





