CDA230

Parker v. Google, Inc., 422 F. Supp. 2d 492, decision summary aff'd, 242 Fed. Appx. 833 (3d Cir. 2007), cert denied 522 U.S. 1156 (2008)

Type of online publisher: 
Google, search engine
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Archived; cached; made content available via search
CDA § 230 applicable?: 
Yes

An author sued Google for defamation, invasion of privacy and negligence because Google archived defamatory messages posted about him on a third-party website and displayed "an authorized biography of Plaintiff" when his name was entered as a Google search query. The court rejected the claims: "It is clear that § 230 was intended to provide immunity for service providers like Google on exactly the claims Plaintiff raises here."

Court Opinion Document: 
Jurisdiction: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The clock is ticking on Section 215 sunset, but the Senate is in stalemate on NSA spying powers: https://eff.org/r.tpwa

May 22 @ 10:58pm

BREAKING: At the behest of @SenateMajLdr, the Senate will meet Sunday, May 31st in the afternoon, mere hours before Section 215 expires.

May 22 @ 10:20pm

BREAKING: Senator Rand Paul objecting to even one more day of extending Section 215.

May 22 @ 10:08pm
JavaScript license information