CDA230

Parker v. Google, Inc., 422 F. Supp. 2d 492, decision summary aff'd, 242 Fed. Appx. 833 (3d Cir. 2007), cert denied 522 U.S. 1156 (2008)

Type of online publisher: 
Google, search engine
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Archived; cached; made content available via search
CDA § 230 applicable?: 
Yes

An author sued Google for defamation, invasion of privacy and negligence because Google archived defamatory messages posted about him on a third-party website and displayed "an authorized biography of Plaintiff" when his name was entered as a Google search query. The court rejected the claims: "It is clear that § 230 was intended to provide immunity for service providers like Google on exactly the claims Plaintiff raises here."

Court Opinion Document: 
Jurisdiction: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Father of the Internet's solution to software vulnerabilities is threatened by TPP's source code disclosure ban: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/20...

Feb 11 @ 4:13pm

Remembering one of the first constitutional challenges to the CDA—a guest post from the founder of Annoy·com: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Feb 11 @ 2:56pm

Colombia: ¿Es legítima la retención de datos? https://eff.org/r.nfxh

Feb 11 @ 2:38pm
JavaScript license information