CDA230

Green v. America Online, 318 F.3d 465 (3d. Cir. 2003)

Type of online publisher: 
America Online (AOL), online chat room
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Transmitted messages between third parties
CDA § 230 applicable?: 
Yes

In the Third Circuit's first CDA § 230 case, the plaintiff sued AOL after two other AOL users sent him defamatory messages and a virus-like "punter" program through an AOL chat room. But the court ruled that the program fell within the definition of "information" provided by a third party under CDA § 230, and that AOL had not waived its § 230 immunity through its Membership Agreement (which stipulated that AOL did not assume responsibility for third-party content).

The court also rejected the plaintiff’s claims that CDA § 230 violated the First Amendment and exceeded Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause.

Key Quotes:

Green thus attempts to hold AOL liable for "decisions relating to the monitoring, screening, and deletion of content from its network - actions quintessentially related to a publisher's role." Section 230 "specifically proscribes liability" in such circumstances (citing Zeran at 332-333).

Court Opinion Document: 
Jurisdiction: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The clock is ticking on Section 215 sunset, but the Senate is in stalemate on NSA spying powers: https://eff.org/r.tpwa

May 22 @ 10:58pm

BREAKING: At the behest of @SenateMajLdr, the Senate will meet Sunday, May 31st in the afternoon, mere hours before Section 215 expires.

May 22 @ 10:20pm

BREAKING: Senator Rand Paul objecting to even one more day of extending Section 215.

May 22 @ 10:08pm
JavaScript license information