CDA230

Goddard v. Google, Inc., 640 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

Type of online publisher: 
Google, online advertisement tool
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Keyword tool suggests words for advertisers to include in ads
CDA § 230 applicable?: 
Yes

Plaintiff Goddard sued Google for displaying third-party ads that led to allegedly fraudulent mobile subscription services.

The plaintiffs accused Google of furthering unlawful activity because its Keyword Tool suggested to advertisers of mobile content that they include the word "free" in advertisements including the word "ringtone." The court held that CDA § 230 barred the claim, because the Keyword Tool was a neutral tool that "does nothing more than provide options that advertisers may adopt or reject at their discretion."

Court Opinion Document: 
Jurisdiction: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

A new ICANN proposal to force more domain registration info to be public would endanger targets of harassment: https://eff.org/r.o85z

Jul 2 @ 8:39am

Are you a developer facing legal threats based on Oracle v. Google? We want to hear from you: https://eff.org/r.m2yr

Jul 1 @ 3:38pm

UK admits it illegally spied on Amnesty International https://eff.org/r.oqml

Jul 1 @ 2:17pm
JavaScript license information