Carafano v., Inc., 339 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2003)

Type of online publisher:, dating website
Publisher's Role in Third Party Content: 
Standardized questions on profile
CDA § 230 applicable?: 

The dating website, Inc., was sued for a third-party's objectionable response to an online questionnaire. The court ruled that providing a questionnaire for users to fill out did not make a dating website an information content provider because none of the objectionable content posted by the third-party "bore more than a tenuous relationship to the actual questions asked."

The court concluded that calling a website a content creator for posting standardized questions would run counter to Congressional intent in enacting CDA § 230, since creating easily encoded questions arguably "promotes the expressed Congressional policy ‘to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services.'"

Key Quotes:

[R]eviewing courts have treated § 230(c) immunity as quite robust, adopting a relatively expansive definition of "interactive computer service" and a relatively restrictive definition of "information content provider."

Under § 230 ... so long as a third party willingly provides the essential published content, the interactive service provider receives full immunity regardless of the specific editing or selection process.

Congress granted most Internet services immunity from liability for publishing false or defamatory material so long as the information was provided by another party. As a result, Internet publishers are treated differently from corresponding publishers in print, television and radio.

Court Opinion Document: 

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Here's a fun argument that the history of DRM stretches back 3000 years. In our view, that's 3000 years too long.

Nov 30 @ 12:59pm

HR 699 would update archaic rules about email privacy. Tomorrow it has a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee:

Nov 30 @ 12:31pm

“Los Angeles Just Proposed the Worst Use of License Plate Reader Data in History” —police technologist @nselby

Nov 30 @ 10:57am
JavaScript license information