December 27, 2013 | By Mark Rumold

Judge's Decision Is Disappointing, But Fight Over Program's Legality Is Not Over

After the D.C. District Court found the NSA’s record collection program unconstitutional just last week, we are obviously disappointed and disagree with Judge Wiliam H. Pauley’s decision in ACLU v. Clapper today. Among other things, the decision relied on government justifications for the program that have been repeatedly disproven, and a 30-year-old Supreme Court decision concerning the call records of a single person over a matter of weeks. Neither provides a legitimate basis for the NSA to vacuum up the call records of hundreds of millions of Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing, and to keep and search those records for 5 years. EFF filed an amicus brief in the ACLU case on behalf of Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, the author of the Patriot Act.

EFF still has two cases challenging the NSA’s records collection program pending in the Northern District of California, First Unitarian v. NSA and Jewel v. NSA, and we look forward to having those cases heard. In spite of the ruling today, the fight over the legality of the NSA's surveillance programs is far from over.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

We can't keep waiting while patent trolls take advantage of unfair procedural rules. Pass the VENUE Act now. https://act.eff.org/action/fi...

May 5 @ 10:16am

Meet the judge who hears a quarter of the nation's patent cases. https://motherboard.vice.com/...

May 5 @ 10:15am

How safe is your data in the gig economy? EFF’s ‘Who Has Your Back’ report takes on Uber, Airbnb, and more https://www.eff.org/press/rel...

May 5 @ 8:32am
JavaScript license information