December 27, 2013 | By Mark Rumold

Judge's Decision Is Disappointing, But Fight Over Program's Legality Is Not Over

After the D.C. District Court found the NSA’s record collection program unconstitutional just last week, we are obviously disappointed and disagree with Judge Wiliam H. Pauley’s decision in ACLU v. Clapper today. Among other things, the decision relied on government justifications for the program that have been repeatedly disproven, and a 30-year-old Supreme Court decision concerning the call records of a single person over a matter of weeks. Neither provides a legitimate basis for the NSA to vacuum up the call records of hundreds of millions of Americans without any suspicion of wrongdoing, and to keep and search those records for 5 years. EFF filed an amicus brief in the ACLU case on behalf of Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, the author of the Patriot Act.

EFF still has two cases challenging the NSA’s records collection program pending in the Northern District of California, First Unitarian v. NSA and Jewel v. NSA, and we look forward to having those cases heard. In spite of the ruling today, the fight over the legality of the NSA's surveillance programs is far from over.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Father of the Internet's solution to software vulnerabilities is threatened by TPP's source code disclosure ban: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/20...

Feb 11 @ 4:13pm

Remembering one of the first constitutional challenges to the CDA—a guest post from the founder of Annoy·com: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Feb 11 @ 2:56pm

Colombia: ¿Es legítima la retención de datos? https://eff.org/r.nfxh

Feb 11 @ 2:38pm
JavaScript license information