Exhibit B: Letter from FISC Presiding Judge responding to Senate Judiciary Committee
Consent Motion to Continue Motion Hearing
EFF Reply to Opposition to Cross Motion for In Camera Review
EFF argues that the DOJ has relied upon a non-public filing to say that the documents have been reviewed to determine whether any parts can be released. EFF further argues that the judge should conduct his own examination.
Redacted Declaration of Matthew G. Olsen
Notice of Lodging of Classified Exhibit for Court's In Camera, Ex Parte Review
Memorandum in Opposition to Cross Motion for In Camera Review and Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
The DOJ argues that there is no reason for a judge to review the documents unless EFF can argue, with evidence, that the DOJ has improperly withheld some information.
EFF's Memorandum in Opposition to the Department of Justice's Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of EFF's Cross Motion
The EFF argues that the DOJ has not analyzed the documents to determine whether any portions can be released without harming national security (as FOIA requires). Further, it asks the court to examine the documents itself, in secret.
