Digital Rights Management

Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies attempt to control what you can and can't do with the media and hardware you've purchased.

  • Bought an ebook from Amazon, but can't read it on your ebook reader of choice? That's DRM.
  • Bought a DVD or Blu-Ray, but can't copy the video onto your portable media player? That's DRM.
  • Bought a video-game, but can't play it today because the manufacturer's "authentication servers" are off-line? That's DRM.
  • Bought a smart-phone, but can't use the applications or the service provider you want on it? That's DRM.

Corporations claim that DRM is necessary to fight copyright infringement online and keep consumers safe from viruses. But there's no evidence that DRM helps fight either of those. Instead, DRM helps big business stifle innovation and competition, by making it easy to quash "unauthorized" uses of media and technology.

DRM has proliferated thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA), which sought to outlaw any attempt to bypass DRM.

Fans shouldn't be treated like criminals, and companies shouldn't get an automatic veto over user choice and innovation. EFF has led the effort to free the iPhone and other smart phones, is working to uncover and explain the restrictions around new hardware and software, has fought for the right to make copies of DVDs, and sued Sony-BMG for their "rootkit" CD copy protection scheme. Learn more about our efforts through the links below, and consider donating to support our efforts.


Litigation

  • 2006 DMCA Rulemaking
    EFF did not file for DMCA exemption requests in 2006. Instead, we explained why the rule-making process is fundamentally broken and unable to protect consumers.
  • RealNetworks v. DVD-CCA (RealDVD case)
    On September 30, 2008, the day Real was to formally launch its RealDVD product, the motion picture studios filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles and asked for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to block the launch. The same day, RealNetworks filed a lawsuit in San Francisco asking the court to declare that distribution of RealDVD is lawful.
  • US v. ElcomSoft Sklyarov
  • Sony BMG Litigation Info
  • Macrovision v. Sima
    In 2005, Macrovision sued Sima to block the sale of the Sima CopyThis! (CT-1, CT-Q1, CT-100, CT-2, CT-200) and GoDVD (SCC, and SCC-2) products, which are designed to digitize analog video, such as the analog video outputs of DVD players and analog VCRs. The Macrovision Analog Copy Protection (ACP) signals often embedded in these analog outputs, however, do not survive the digitizing process, and therefore are not embedded in the outputs of the Sima devices. Macrovision argued that this violates both Macrovision's patents and the DMCA's prohibition on circumvention.

In The News

» All Digital Rights Management News Articles

Other Resources

Related Issues

  • Analog Hole
    Hollywood Versus The Analog Hole
  • Digital Radio
    RIAA's Attempt to Control Recording From the Radio
  • Broadcast Flag
    A mandate would force all future digital televisiontuners to include "content protection" (aka DRM) technologies.
  • Digital Video
    Digital Video Restrictions

Whitepapers