Innovation

New ideas challenge the status quo. That's why people who make cool tools get so much heat from the old guard -- and their lawyers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) thinks that innovation is inextricably tied to freedom of speech, and innovators need to be protected from established businesses that use the law to stifle creativity and kill competition.

Litigation

  • Arista v. Lime Wire
  • RealNetworks v. DVD-CCA (RealDVD case)
    On September 30, 2008, the day Real was to formally launch its RealDVD product, the motion picture studios filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles and asked for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to block the launch. The same day, RealNetworks filed a lawsuit in San Francisco asking the court to declare that distribution of RealDVD is lawful.
  • OdioWorks v Apple
  • US v. ASCAP
  • Blizzard v. BNETD
  • Paramount v. ReplayTV
  • Macrovision v. Sima
    In 2005, Macrovision sued Sima to block the sale of the Sima CopyThis! (CT-1, CT-Q1, CT-100, CT-2, CT-200) and GoDVD (SCC, and SCC-2) products, which are designed to digitize analog video, such as the analog video outputs of DVD players and analog VCRs. The Macrovision Analog Copy Protection (ACP) signals often embedded in these analog outputs, however, do not survive the digitizing process, and therefore are not embedded in the outputs of the Sima devices. Macrovision argued that this violates both Macrovision's patents and the DMCA's prohibition on circumvention.
  • Perfect 10 v. Google
» All Innovation Cases

In The News

» All Innovation News Articles

Other Resources

Related Issues

Whitepapers

Subscribe to EFFector

[our free email newsletter]

(optional)
» EFFector Archive