Electronic Frontier Foundation
EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending
your rights in the digital world. » About Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Deeplinks Blog
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Shop
Home » Deeplinks Blog » August, 2008
  • Deeplinks Archives
    • October, 2011
    • September, 2011
    • August, 2011
    • July, 2011
    • June, 2011
    • May, 2011
    • April, 2011
    • March, 2011
    • More Archives
  • Blog Categories
    • Accessibility for the Reading Disabled
    • Analog Hole
    • Announcement
    • Anonymity
    • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
    • Bloggers' Rights
    • Broadcast Flag
    • Broadcasting Treaty
    • CALEA
    • Call To Action
    • CDA 230
    • Cell Tracking
    • Coders' Rights Project
    • Commentary
    • Copyright Trolls
    • Council of Europe
    • Criminalizing Content
    • Development Agenda
    • Digital Books
    • Digital Radio
    • Digital Rights Management
    • Digital Video
    • DMCA
    • DMCA Rulemaking
    • Do Not Track
    • E-Voting Rights
    • EFF Europe
    • EFF15
    • File Sharing
    • FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government
    • Free Speech
    • Free Trade Agreement of the Americas
    • Hollywood v. DVD
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • International Privacy Standards
    • Legal Analysis
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Locational Privacy
    • Mandatory Data Retention
    • miniLinks
    • National Security Letters
    • Net Neutrality
    • News Roundup
    • News Update
    • No Downtime for Free Speech Campaign
    • NSA Spying
    • Online Behavioral Tracking
    • Patents
    • PATRIOT Act
    • Pen Trap
    • Printers
    • Privacy
    • Real ID
    • RFID
    • Search Engines
    • Search Incident to Arrest
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Technical Analysis
    • Terms Of (Ab)Use
    • Test Your ISP
    • The COICA Internet Censorship and Copyright Bill
    • The Global Network Initiative
    • Transparency
    • Travel Screening
    • Trusted Computing
    • Video Games
    • Wikileaks
    • WIPO
August 21st, 2008
Email This Digg This Post this to Reddit Share this blog post with delicious Share this on Facebook Tweet this blog post Dent this blog post

Order Against Comcast Issued, FCC Credits EFF

Legal Analysis by Fred von Lohmann

The FCC has finally published its order (adopted on August 1) directing Comcast to stop blocking BitTorrent traffic. The 34-page ruling makes for surprisingly enjoyable reading, at least as FCC publications go. The order follows the basic outline that was explained by Chairman Martin in his statement on August 1, 2008. But there are some interesting additional tidbits:

  • The FCC specifically cites and credits EFF's testing in discussing Comcast's BitTorrent blocking activities. And it also relies explicitly on evidence gathered by individual Internet users Adam Lynn, Jeffrey Pearlman, David Gerisch, Dean Fox, and Robert Topolski. The order concludes with this remarkable invitation: "We invite ... members of the public to keep a watchful eye on Comcast." And, as it happens, EFF is building the Switzerland network testing tool to help Internet users to do just that!
  • The Commission dismisses Comcast's claim that it was merely "delaying" BitTorrent traffic as "verbal gymnastics," specifically finding that "the company has engaged in blocking." Glad to see we can put that semantic debate to rest.
  • The FCC sets out a standard for reviewing discrimination undertaken in the name of "reasonable network management": the "practice should further a critically important interest and be narrowly or carefully tailored to serve that interest." According to the FCC, even if congestion management was "critically important," Comcast's methods were hopelessly over- and under-inclusive. The Commission cited EFF's testing on this point, noting that Comcast admitted to blocking BitTorrent seeding without regard to neighborhood congestion or user-specific bandwidth usage.
  • Also in accord with the comments submitted by EFF, the FCC called Comcast out for its failure to disclose its practices to its customers, noting that "Comcast's first reaction to allegations of discriminatory treatment was not honesty, but at best misdirection and obfuscation."
  • The FCC spends 12 pages justifying its regulatory authority to issue the order, invoking its Title I "ancillary jurisdiction" to regulate in the name of "national Internet policy" as described in seven statutory provisions, all of which speak in general terms about "promoting deployment," "promoting accessibility," "reducing market entry barriers," and the like. Reading this section of the order, one can't help but feel sympathy for Commissioner McDowell, who in his dissent worries that "under the analysis set forth in the order, the Commission can apparently do anything so long as it frames its actions in terms of promoting the Internet or broadband deployment." If Comcast sues to overturn the order, you can be sure that this is where it will focus its attack.
  • And now for the remedy. Quoting Ronald Reagan's mantra, "trust but verify," the Commission has ordered Comcast to do 3 things within 30 days:

    (1) disclose to the Commission [but not the public?] the precise contours of the network management practices at issue here, including what equipment has been utilized, when it began to be employed, when and under what circumstances it has been used, how it has been configured, what protocols have been affected, and where it has been deployed;

    (2) submit a compliance plan to the Commission with interim benchmarks that describes how it intends to transition from discriminatory to nondiscriminatory network management practices by the end of the year; and

    (3) disclose to the Commission and the public the details of the network management practices that it intends to deploy following the termination of its current practices, including the thresholds that will trigger any limits on customers’ access to bandwidth.

So, while we continue to be worried about the future risk of regulatory capture of the FCC by large ISPs, and have our doubts about the Commission's authority to regulate the Internet, the order hits the nail on the head when it comes to analyzing what Comcast actually was up to.

Related Issues: File Sharing, Innovation, Test Your ISP

[Permalink]

Donate to EFF
Make a One-Time Contribution
Join EFF
Become a Member

Subscribe to EFFector

EFF's Newsletter and Action Alerts

Headlines

  • Victory for Reader Privacy
  • The Humble Frozen Synapse Bundle
  • Don't Let Privacy Law Get Stuck in 1986
  • Open Source Security
  • 2011 Pioneer Awards!

Projects

  • Bloggers' Rights
  • Coders' Rights
  • FOIA Project
  • Follow EFF
  • Patent Busting
  • Surveillance Self-Defense
  • Teaching Copyright
  • Takedown Hall of Shame
  • TOSBack
  • Ways To Help
Want to learn how you can defend free speech, stand up for privacy, fight for government transparency, support consumer rights, and protect your right to innovation in the digital world? Visit http://eff.org/fight to find ways to help.
Creative Commons Licensed
  • Thanks
  • RSS Feeds
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact EFF