Blizzard v. BNETD
At issue in this case was whether three software programmers who created the BnetD game server -- which interoperates with Blizzard video games online -- were in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Blizzard Games' end user license agreement (EULA).
BnetD was an open source program that let gamers play popular Blizzard titles like Warcraft with other gamers on servers that don't belong to Blizzard's Battle.net service. Blizzard argued that the programmers who wrote BnetD violated the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions and that the programmers also violated several parts of Blizzard's EULA, including a section on reverse engineering.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder served as counsel for defendants, arguing that programmers should be allowed to create free software designed to work with commercial products because it benefited consumers and helped promote innovation. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, holding that reverse engineering and emulating the Blizzard software were illegal.
Outcome: The reverse engineering and emulating of the Blizzard software violated the anticircumvention provisions of the DMCA. This ruling has been widely criticized as making it impossible to create new programs that interoperate with older ones and squeezing consumer choice out of the marketplace by essentially allowing companies to outlaw competitors' products that interact with their own.
Documents
Table Of Contents
- District Court Documents - Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- District Court Documents - Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue
- District Court Documents - Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims
- District Court Documents - Decision on both Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgement
- Decision
- Complaints
- Audio of Oral Arguments
- Appeal Documents - Appellees' Brief
- Appeal Documents - Appellants' Briefs
- Appeal Documents - Amicus Briefs in support of Appellants
- Appeal Documents - Amicus Briefs in Support of Appellees
District Court Documents - Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- February 17, 2004 Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their Motion or Partial Summary Judgment[PDF, 51.43 KB]
- January 26, 2004 Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment[PDF, 254.37 KB]
- December 22, 2003 Blizzard's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its DMCA and EULA claims[PDF, 56.46 KB]
- Defendants' Supplemental Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment[PDF, 184.65 KB]
District Court Documents - Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue
- July 2, 2003 Reply Memorandum in support of Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue[PDF, 634.29 KB]
- June 18, 2003 Plaintiffs opposition to new venue[PDF, 324.21 KB]
- Motion to Transfer Venue and Memorandum in Support of Motion by defendants Internet Gateway, Inc., Tim Jung, Ross Combs and Rob[PDF, 868.06 KB]
District Court Documents - Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims
- February 21, 2004 Brief Amici Curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment[PDF, 131.13 KB]
- February 17, 2004 Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment[PDF, 292.62 KB]
- January 26, 2004 Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment[PDF, 79.13 KB]
- December 22, 2003 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims[PDF, 1.42 MB]
District Court Documents - Decision on both Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgement
- September 30, 2004 Court's Memorandum and Order[PDF, 143.34 KB]
Decision
- September 1, 2005 Eighth Circuit ruling affirming the district court grant of summary judgment[PDF, 144.93 KB]
Complaints
- January 15, 2003 Second Amended Complaint[PDF, 1.13 MB]
- December 4, 2002 Defendants' Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint[PDF, 687.86 KB]
- December 3, 2002 Exhibits for Second Amended Complaint[PDF, 2.80 MB]
- April 14, 2002 First Amended Complaint filed by Blizzard Entertainment/Vivendi Universal/Davidson[PDF, 615.41 KB]
- February 19, 2002 Complaint filed by Blizzard Entertainment/Vivendi Universal/Davidson[PDF, 1.83 MB]
Audio of Oral Arguments
- June 20, 2005 Audio of Oral Arguments before the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals[MP3, 18.48 MB]
Appeal Documents - Appellees' Brief
- Appellees Brief[PDF, 141.75 KB]
Appeal Documents - Appellants' Briefs
- Opening Brief of Defendants-Appellants[PDF, 576.63 KB]
- Reply Brief of Defendants-Appellants[PDF, 116.39 KB]
Appeal Documents - Amicus Briefs in support of Appellants
- Brief of Computer & Communications Industry Association and Open Source & Industry Alliance[PDF, 66.46 KB]
- Brief of Consumers Union and Public Knowledge[PDF, 291.61 KB]
- Brief of IEEE-USA[PDF, 125.64 KB]
- Brief of Intellectual Property Law Professors[PDF, 95.37 KB]
Appeal Documents - Amicus Briefs in Support of Appellees
- Brief of 22nd Century Foundation and Software & Information Industry[PDF, 170.65 KB]
- Brief of Data Tree, LLC, First American Real Estate Solutions, and Reed Elsevier, Inc[PDF, 65.11 KB]
- Brief of ESA, RIAA, MPAA[PDF, 2.93 MB]
Press Releases
- September 01, 2005 Federal Court Slams Door on Add-On Innovation
- June 16, 2005 Consumer Choice at issue in Oral Argument in Blizzard v. Bnetd
- November 04, 2004 EFF Appeals Anti-Competitive BnetD Ruling
- September 30, 2004 Dangerous Ruling Menaces Rights of Free Software Programmers
- April 08, 2002 Blizzard Freezes Bnetd Gaming Platform, Sues Own Customers
- March 12, 2002 Media Conglomerate Threatens Suit Against Gamer Community
Other Resources
- EFF letter to Blizzard/Vivendi
- Penny Arcade[penny-arcade.com]
