EFF in the News
"There's a huge amount of power in Google's hands to decide how it does this with very little influence outside of Google," said Danny O'Brien, international director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
"It's like a secret agreement between Google and the data protection authorities in Europe. That's sort of disturbing," he told the E-Commerce Times.
"There should be a law," O'Brien urged, "instead of Google and a bunch privacy experts negotiating among themselves on a free expression issue."
The challenge is being brought forward by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization of pro-privacy advocates who have been litigating cases like this for much of a decade.
Mark Jaycox, legislative analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Jamil Jafger, former Republican Chief Counsel and Senior Advisor, U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, squared off at Black Hat USA 2015 in a friendly, but sometime lively, debate on the recently passed USA Freedom Act.Jaycox calked the legislation "a small step, but an important step" for privacy advocates and citizens because it "narrows government surveillance authority."
Passage of the Act proved that "we can have a sustained, coordinated campaign and [get] something through congress."
"The NSA doesn't need more illegal tools," Sophia Cope, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told the Daily Dot in an email. "Congressional oversight revealed that the illegal bulk collection of Americans' phone records was ineffective at foiling terrorist plots. Sen. Paul's response to Gov. Christie was simple: get a warrant."
It's taken seven years of legal wrangling, but one group of pro-privacy activists are hoping an appeals court will finally declare a critical part of the National Security Agency's spying apparatus unconstitutional.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has been challenging the NSA's bulk data collection program in court since 2008, largely running on whisteblower testimony from Mark Klein, a former AT&T technician who alleges the NSA inserted technology into the internet company's infrastructure that allowed it to collect and analyze the data.
“The tide I think is turning,” said Hanni Fakhoury, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which joined a friend-of-the-court brief in the case of Aaron Graham, a man convicted of armed robbery after his cell phone location information over seven months was obtained by the government from Sprint.
“For several years now, car companies have been adding software and computer and Internet capabilities to their automobiles, but they may not have been putting the same level of care into the security,” said Kurt Opsahl, deputy executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit civil rights group in San Francisco that represents the security research community.
“Cars are really just an example of issues arising from the Internet of Things, where more and more objects are being connected,” Opsahl added.
Do Not Track, a standard Web browser setting intended to let consumers avoid sharing their browsing behavior with advertisers, has become a battleground.
Online publishers and advertisers often ignore it, and major browser makers switch it off by default. Nearly a quarter of people who use Web browsers have responded by installing software that simply blocks online ads, according to Forrester Research Inc.
Now the Electronic Frontier Foundation has called a truce. The privacy group Monday unveiled a code of conduct for online publishers. The EFF positions its proposal as a compromise that allows consumers to avoid tracking and publishers to gather ad revenue.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, the non-profit dedicated to securing digital privacy and civil liberties, is trying to get the companies behind major web browsers to adopt a standard for their “Do Not Track” setting. The organization is allying with Disconnect, a San Francisco developer of user-friendly privacy tools, to form a coalition of internet companies that will set down harder rules for the oft-looked-over setting that seeks to give users power over data that’s tracked by advertising companies on most commercial websites.
Most Bay Area communities also have automated license scanners on officers’ cars or at fixed locations, and some have already cited the Los Angeles case as authority to withhold their records, said attorney Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Her group and other civil liberties advocates asked the state high court to take the case.