EFF in the News
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is assisting the plaintiffs in several of the key cases, said the government should find a way to get rid of most of the data.
“Talks are continuing about a plan under which the government would destroy the phone records — including those still lingering in its various databases — while ensuring that the courts can still consider our challenge to 14 years of NSA telephone records collection from millions of innocent Americans,” said EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene.
“Changes to the e-commerce chapter continue to be made in complete isolation from the stakeholders it affects, notably the global Internet community of users and innovators. This legacy, closed model of trade negotiation is no way to be making public policy for the digital environment,” noted Jeremy Malcolm, Senior Global Policy Analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
“It does give a lot of breathing room to other companies and individuals trying to do a lot of innovative activity,” said Parker Higgins, director of copyright activism at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights advocacy group.
“At this point, it should go without saying that the information the FBI wants to include in the statue is extremely revealing — URLs, for example, may reveal the content of a website that users have visited, their location, and so on,” Andrew Crocker, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, wrote in an email to The Intercept.
"Your car essentially knows where you sleep, where you work, where you eat, where your kids go to school, if you go to church, if you're having an affair -- you name it," said Nate Cardozo, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit devoted to civil liberties online. "But the OEMs are opaque. They don't tell us what they're collecting, they don't tell us with whom they're sharing it, and they don't tell us how often the government comes knocking."
While tech companies like Google usually release a “transparency report” to show how frequently the government asks for information on their users, automakers don’t and it isn’t clear how often law enforcement requests data from connected cars. “Your car essentially knows where you sleep, where you work, where you eat, where your kids go to school, if you go to church, if you’re having an affair — you name it,” according to Nate Cardozo, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit devoted to civil liberties online. “But the OEMs are opaque. They don’t tell us what they’re collecting, they don’t tell us with whom they’re sharing it, and they don’t tell us how often the government comes knocking.”
"The ISP is the only market player that has the ability to see all of a consumer's online traffic and behavior," said Ernesto Falcon, a legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "Consumers can't hide from their ISP even if they tried."
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the leading nonprofit organization defending electronic civil liberties, has also taken on the case.
“The FBI needs to open up and tell Isis what it is they want before she can decide if she will meet with them,” EFF Senior Staff Attorney Nate Cardozo told Sputnik. “They've said she isn't under investigation, but there are still too many unanswered questions. Isis has a right to know what's going on instead of playing this strange guessing game as she's pursued by federal agents.”
District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis and her colleagues argue that a new bill requiring tech companies to weaken the security of their products would assist law enforcement, but they fail to mention the cost: the safety of all Americans’ data. - Opinion piece by Dave Maass is an investigative researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that defends civil liberties at the crossroads of technology and the law.
Seth Schoen, a programmer who works for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), had followed the story when it unfolded originally. His own contribution was to write DeCSS out as a haiku poem. But he was particularly struck by Carmody’s conversion of the program into a prime number.
“You could find it in a number which feels more like this thing was occurring in nature,” he explains. “This thing that’s just out there. The industry was saying that one of these primes is illegal – and that was more conceptually striking maybe than some of the other contributions.”