March 26, 2012 | By Julie Samuels

EFF Files Comments Protesting Reexam Fee Hikes

You might remember that late last year, Congress passed the America Invents Act, a largely toothless law that fails to address many of the biggest problems facing the patent system. In implementing that new law, the Patent and Trademark Office issued proposed guidelines for certain supplemental examination procedures. The PTO also recommended a huge increase in fees for filing certain patent reexaminations. As you might guess, this is a terrible idea.

The reexam process is an essential part of the patent ecosystem. It forms the basis for our Patent Busting Project and allows us to attack dangerous and overbroad patents like those that are asserted against cash-strapped municipalities.  

It's vitally important that public interest groups like EFF and small entities who may lack substantial resources be able to participate in reexams at the PTO. Raising the fees for filing reexams to $17,750 (for filing alone!) promises to discourage that important third-party participation, which the Patent Office claims to care much about. Today, we filed comments with the Patent Office saying as much, and urging the Office to reconsider the fee increase – or at least carve out an exception for public interest groups and other small entities. The Patent Office should use this opportunity to encourage the type of participation in the reexam process that benefits inventors, users, and an agenda that promotes innovation.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The Department of Education has extended its deadline. Sign our petition by Dec 16 to support open education.

Nov 30 @ 1:51pm

Here's a fun argument that the history of DRM stretches back 3000 years. In our view, that's 3000 years too long.

Nov 30 @ 12:59pm

HR 699 would update archaic rules about email privacy. Tomorrow it has a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee:

Nov 30 @ 12:31pm
JavaScript license information