January 29, 2008 | By Cindy Cohn

EFF Testifies Before House Committee in Support of State Secrets Privilege Reform

EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston testified before the U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties today, using EFF's case against AT&T as an example of the misuse of the State Secrets Privilege by the Administration. The hearing was the Oversight Hearing on Reform of the State Secrets Privilege.

Bankston highlighted the fact that the Administration is attempting to use the state secrets privilege to shield itself and the telecommunications carriers from accountability for violating the rights of millions of Americans. He observed that the Administration is simultaneously claiming that no information can be presented to the court about the warrantless wiretapping without harming national security, while at the same time selectively providing information to Congress and the public when that information will further its political goals. Bankston said:

The Administration should not be allowed to share or withhold information for its own political advantage, or to avoid accountability.

Bankston also noted that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) already contained provisions allowing national security evidence to be handled within the case, in 50 U.S.C. 1806(f), and urged Congress to clarify that those procedures are appropriate in the NSA wiretapping cases.

The Committee also received a written statement from William Webster, who has served as a federal judge and as the Director of both the FBI and CIA. Judge Webster warned that the Executive Branch should not be given sole authority to determine whether evidence should be subject to the state secrets privilege. He said:

Granting executive branch officials unchecked discretion to determine whether evidence should be subject to the state secrets privilege provides too great a temptation for abuse. It makes much more sense to require the executive branch to submit such evidence to the courts for an independent assessment of whether the privilege should apply. Courts, not executive branch officials, should be entrusted to make these determinations and thereby preserve our constitutional system of checks and balances.

Also testifying were:

H. Thomas Wells, Jr.,
President-Elect of the American Bar Association

Judith Loether
Daughter of Victim in U.S. v. Reynolds

Hon. Patricia Wald
Retired Chief Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Patrick Philbin
Partner
Kirkland & Ellis


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Recording Academy says "lock us in a room" to rewrite the copyright law. We say that room must be open to all. https://eff.org/r.i4jg

May 6 @ 12:02pm

Secrecy in the judicial process has "risen to literally unprecedented levels," according to Judge Stephen Wm. Smith https://www.justsecurity.org/...

May 6 @ 10:40am

Fighting patent trolls, curbing NSA surveillance, and encrypting the Web. 2015 was a big year for EFF. https://www.eff.org/files/ann...

May 6 @ 9:56am
JavaScript license information