Capitol v. Thomas

Last October Jammie Thomas was found liable for copyright infringement for file sharing and hit with a $222 000 judgment. Thomas' case was the first file sharing lawsuit to reach a jury verdict.

On May 15 2008 Judge Michael Davis requested briefing on whether Thomas should receive a new trial. The court said it was concerned that it might have made a mistake by instructing the jury that Thomas could be found liable if she simply made copyrighted songs available in a shared folder. There's good reason for this concern — as EFF noted at the time and several courts have since affirmed "making available" is not a cause of action under copyright law. EFF weighed in as amicus in June of 2008.

On September 24 2008 the concluded that simply "making available" is not a distribution and on that basis granted Thomas a new trial. The judge also called upon Congress to amend the Copyright Act to avoid the award of damages in P2P cases that are "unprecedented and oppressive."

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Tell your lawmakers: it's time to #MoveFASTR. Support public access to publicly funded research today. https://eff.org/r.2iql

Jul 28 @ 12:56pm

The public deserves access to the research it funds. Read @CreativeCommons on why -now- is the time to #MoveFASTR: https://eff.org/r.o0l4

Jul 28 @ 12:50pm

Over 1,000 users support our campaign to stop ridiculous copyright extensions in TPP. Sign on now: https://eff.org/r.bk2l

Jul 28 @ 12:10pm
JavaScript license information