EFF in the News
“Well-meaning Internet users are often afraid to tell companies about security flaws they've found — they don't know whether they'll get hearty thanks or slapped with a lawsuit or even criminal prosecution,” blogged Marcia Hofmann, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). "This tension is unfortunate, because when companies learn what needs to be fixed, their services will be better and their users safer.”
Upon hearing the news, the The Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization aimed to defend digital rights, immediately stepped in hoping to sway a judge in favor of protected the downloaders identity.
To the downloaders relief, a West Virginian judge ruled that the adult film producer could not force Time Warner to reveal the downloader's identity as part of the effort to sue them for copyright infringement.
The EFF notes that many copyright trolls use this mass filing technique where they lump multiple illegal downloader into one large suit.
In a big victory in the fight against copyright trolls, a judge in West Virginia has blocked an attempt to unmask accused file sharers in seven predatory lawsuits involving the alleged illegal downloading of pornography. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), working with Charles J. Kaiser of Phillips, Gardill, Kaiser & Altmeyer, PLLC, filed an amicus brief in the case, arguing that the film companies were abusing the law in an attempt to pressure settlements.
Yesterday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals refused the government’s request to appeal and earlier pro-privacy determination that allows federal magistrates to mandate a warrant for cell phone location records based on probable cause.
Thanks to our friends at the E.F.F. (Electronic Frontier Foundation) for advocating privacy on the behalf of our citizens. According to the E.F.F. website these decisions have far-reaching effects for devices such GPS, web browsing histories, as well as our e-mails.
Two pro-Fourth Amendment court rulings in as many days are a sign the laws of land are starting to embrace virtual space as an extension of one’s self, to be revered and respected with the same tenacity as our homes.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has won a victory protecting your cell phone location data from unreasonable seizure by the government. The decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals says that judges can deny requests for "D Orders" and require a warrant to avoid possible Fourth Amendment complications.
Cyberlibertarian John Perry Barlow debates bigfoot diplomat John Negroponte on Wikileaks.It’s another move in what John Perry Barlow, cyberlibertarian and founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, has famously called the world’s “first serious infowar.”
Two people with very different views about what WikiLeaks has been doing engaged in an interesting conversation today during WBUR's On Point with Tom Ashbrook show.
Making the case for increased transparency: John Perry Barlow, founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who argues we're in the midst of an infowar between those who favor transparency and those who think the government needs to keep many things close to the vest.
The judge's actions were hailed by civil liberties groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which celebrated another blow against so-called "copyright trolls," which have levied suits against a number of unnamed defendants in a bid to extract settlements, the EFF has claimed. The EFF had filed an amicus brief in the case.
With the warrantless provisions of the SCA voided, consumers would no longer forfeit their Fourth Amendment rights simply by moving storage to the more flexible and convenient cloud.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, along with a wide range of public-interest groups of all political persuasions, have argued for many years that SCA and other provisions of the ECPA are sorely in need of congressional update.
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20025793-281.html#ixzz1Gv5xl9vI
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on US v. Warshack came to what is being called a landmark decision following briefs filed by civil liberties groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). In the briefs, the court was urged that the seizure of email without a warrant represented a violation of the Fourth Amendment rights that apply to postal mail and telephone calls.