EFF in the News
The release of the draft text comes at a time when the Canadian government is holding cross-country consultations to collect public input for new Canadian copyright laws. Agreeing to the treaty would require Canada to meet certain legal requirements. Many of the legal requirements mimic laws already in place in the United States.
"To Canada this would require quite a change from domestic laws," said Gwen Hinze, international director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "That's a good question to be asking of the Canadian negotiators: 'Is this going to leave a lasting legacy that effectively moots any domestic consultation process on copyright issues?'"
And right now, websites can implement browser fingerprinting without user consent or knowledge, said Seth Schoen, staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
"We might not object to a financial site using these techniques to reduce fraud," Schoen said, "but that doesn't necessarily mean the technique should exist or that browsers shouldn't take measures to reduce distinctiveness. It's a problem when people can be tracked without their knowledge in a way that doesn't let them take measures to control tracking."
Early last month the Electronic Frontier Foundation published a copy of the licensing agreement that developers have to sign to sell their apps through the App Store. Among the requirements: developers who used the company’s software development kit could not sell their work through other platforms, even if Apple rejected it, and a prohibition against discussing the agreement itself. (The group obtained a copy of the document by filing a Freedom of Information Act request after NASA released an iPhone App).
“It’s frustrating to see Apple, the original pioneer in generative computing, putting shackles on the market it (for now) leads,” Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney with the group, wrote in a blog post at the time.
“The government’s overreaching secrecy claims backfired against it,” says Kevin Bankston, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which assisted the plaintiffs in their case against the federal government.
A federal judge has ruled that the National Security Agency's use of warrantless surveillance is illegal. US District Judge Vaughn Walker ruled Wednesday in a case based in Oregon that the NSA illegally eavesdropped on two lawyers and an Islamic Charity in 2004. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, states that the government must obtain a search warrant before monitoring domestic calls and electronic communication. But Obama has continued the Bush Administration's argument that key documents in surveillance cases should not be released due to state secret privilege.
To discuss the latest ruling, we're joined by Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a public interest group that specializes in Internet civil liberties issues.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation which has followed the case closely for years has a very informative article on Wednesday's decision.
"Mr. Rehberg did the right thing and blew the whistle on financial mismanagement," said EFF Civil Liberties Director Jennifer Granick. "In response, he was persecuted by local authorities and his constitutional rights were violated. It's well established that individuals have a right to privacy in the content of their communications, electronic or otherwise. We're asking the court to look at this again and follow the law."
"It's well established that individuals have a right to privacy in the content of their communications, electronic or otherwise," EFF Civil Liberties Director Jennifer Granick said in a statement. "We're asking the court to look at this again and follow the law."
To drag the law into the modern era, a coalition of strange bedfellows has formed: the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, Microsoft, Google, AT&T, the Progress & Freedom Foundation, the Center for Democracy and Technology, and others.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a consumer advocacy group, isn't buying the USCG's argument. In a recent blog post, the EFF said the USCG's cases show that "copyright law has become unmoored from its foundations." The EFF also says that "copyright should not line the pockets of copyright trolls intent on shaking down individuals for fast settlements a thousand at a time."