EFF in the News
While the EFF believes running a Tor "exit node is legal," its Tor Challenge stated, "Exit relays raise special concerns because the traffic that exits from them can be traced back to the relay's IP address."
Yesterday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) delivered oral arguments in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, urging the court to preserve lawsuits challenging the U.S. government’s massive domestic spying program led by the National Security Agency (NSA).
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) urged the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to preserve lawsuits challenging the government's illegal mass surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation points to a skeptical June Congressional Research Service report stating, "One of the biggest challenges facing policymakers is how to determine whether the NSI program is successful .
Another round of litigation, brought by the EFF and others, targets the government, accusing federal officials of violating the Fourth Amendment rights of anybody who so-much as sent an e-mail in the years following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
This past Monday, EFF, Public Knowledge and other public interest groups filed an emergency petition with the FCC, calling on the Commission to “Issue a declaratory ruling clarifying that such shutdowns by local governments violate the [amended Communications Act of 1934]” with respect to BART’s pre-emptive cell phone blackout before the BART protests.
On Wednesday, August 31 at 2 p.m., the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle will hear oral argument from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) in Hepting v.AT&T and Jewel v. NSA—EFF’s two cases challenging thegovernment’s illegal mass surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans’ private communications.
The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union and other critics allege that the surveillance was much broader than that, citing a declaration from a longtime AT&T worker that the company had allowed the National Security Agency to build a room in one of the company's buildings and route copies of customers' communications there.
Legal observers such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation say that the embarrassing allegations and low fees can compel people to pay up even if they've done nothing wrong.
Among the groups that signed the letter were the Constitution Project and Electronic Frontier Foundation.