Bernstein v. US Department of Justice
While a graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley, Bernstein completed the development of an encryption equation (an "algorithm") he calls "Snuffle." Bernstein wishes to publish a) the algorithm (b) a mathematical paper describing and explaining the algorithm and (c) the "source code" for a computer program that incorporates the algorithm. Bernstein also wishes to discuss these items at mathematical conferences, college classrooms and other open public meetings. The Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (the ITAR regulatory scheme) required Bernstein to submit his ideas about cryptography to the government for review, to register as an arms dealer, and to apply for and obtain from the government a license to publish his ideas. Failure to do so would result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Bernstein believes this is a violation of his First Amendment rights and has sued the government.
After four years and one regulatory change, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that software source code was speech protected by the First Amendment and that the government's regulations preventing its publication were unconstitutional.
Related Content
-
This is a cover letter for the draft letter from Robert McConnell to Senator Jake Garn. It, and the draft, were written by Theodore Olson, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel. It reaffirms the OLC position that the proposed EAA, and the existing ITAR, establish a...
-
Bernstein's motion in opposition to the State Department motion to dismiss the case....
-
Bernstein's request that the court take judicial notice of the memos from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (the Exhibits to Lee Tien declaration)....
-
Declaration of Cindy Cohn, plaintiff's chief legal counsel in the Bernstein v. State Dept. case, detailing the reasons why it would be premature to dismiss the case at this time, and the documents and testimony that she would like to bring to the court before a decision is reached....
-
The government's attempt to have the case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction....
-
Bernstein's objection to the introduction of evidence (declarations of William Lowell and Louis Giles) at this stage of the proceedings, when only the question of jurisdiction is supposed to be decided. In deciding jurisdiction, the truth of the allegations is assumed unless actual facts...
-
-
60 Minutes
CBS News
555 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019
Dear 60 Minutes,
Your February 26 story on computer security missed the most important point
-- the United States Government requires network providers to keep their
systems easily exploited. Encryption would...
-
In a move aimed at expanding the growth and spread of privacy and security technologies, the Electronic Frontier Foundation is sponsoring a federal lawsuit filed today seeking to bar the government from restricting publication of cryptographic documents and software. EFF argues that the export-control laws, both on their face and...
-
The complaint (charges) filed by EFF and Dan Bernstein against the State Dept. et al., seeking a ruling against the US ITAR export restrictions on encryption, as unconstitutional restraint of free speech.
Pages