May 18, 2005 | By Fred von Lohmann

ISP Liability Debate in Regulation Magazine

The most recent edition of Regulation, a magazine published by the Cato Institute, includes an excellent article entitled "Against ISP Liability" [PDF] by Cato's own Jim Harper.

Jim's article responds to an earlier article by Professor Douglas Lichtman, "Holding Internet Service Providers Accountable" [PDF], in which Doug argues in favor of holding ISPs liable for "malicious computer code" (viruses, worms, and other malware) that propagates over the Internet. A lengthier version of his argument is available at SSRN.

In my view, Jim has the better of this argument, pointing out that putting ISPs on the hook will inexorably lead to the lock-down of the Internet, as ISPs rush to protect themselves, often at the expense of the privacy and freedoms of their subscribers:

"Lichtman's proposal would drive responsibility from the edge of the network toward the center. By forcing intelligence into the middle of the network, ISP liability would push the Internet from a wide-open network toward something far more sclerotic."

Whatever your views on the ultimate question, it's a stimulating exchange between two smart thinkers.

Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Great news! Gov. Brown has signed SB 741—a great first step towards limiting the use & acquisition of IMSI catchers in California.

Oct 8 @ 3:52pm

BREAKING: Victory! @JerryBrownGov signs CalECPA, guaranteeing warrant protection for digital records in California

Oct 8 @ 2:53pm

Do you sit on a police oversight board? Here’s a quick guide to surveillance technology:

Oct 8 @ 1:21pm
JavaScript license information