Skip to main content
How to Fix the Internet Podcast: Pay a Hacker, Save a Life

New technology offers the promise of speech with minimal barriers and without borders. The Internet has radically enhanced our ability to express ourselves and our ability to access, archive, and share information. Everyone should be able to take advantage of this promise.

Individuals around the world should be able to use new technologies to publish their ideas; criticize those in power; gather and report the news; and make, adapt, and share creative works. Vulnerable communities should be able to safely meet and grow, making themselves heard without being drowned out by the powerful. The ability to freely exchange ideas also benefits innovators, who can use all of their capabilities to build even better tools for their communities and the world.

Standing in the way of that promise are legal, structural, and corporate obstacles. Laws and policies have made chokepoints, enabled censorship regimes, controlled access and use of intellectual property, increased government surveillance, and undermined security and safety. Legislation created by democratic governments has caused collateral damage elsewhere. A few powerful players have an outsized influence on free expression that threatens to homogenize and limit the voices on the Internet. Corporations selectively enforce policies and abuse those structures and laws with the result of censorship and self-censorship.

EFF’s mission is to fight for the promise of free expression offered by new technology and overcome the legal, structural, and corporate obstacles in its way.

Protecting Free Expression Online

We work in the courts and in legislatures in the US and around the world to defend and expand the right to access and share information and expression—including anonymous speech. We defend activists, journalists, news outlets, online forums and archives against government and corporate censorship. We also work to preserve the protections against intermediary liability that have been essential to the growth of the Internet as a forum for expression, because online speech platforms and services can only thrive when they don’t risk severe legal repercussions for their users’ activities.

Recognizing that censorship can take many forms, we go to court to hold rights holders accountable when they abuse copyright and trademark rights to shut down lawful speech and research. And we defend and expand your right to secure, encrypted communications, so that dissenting voices can protect themselves from retaliation from governments and private actors.

Our advocacy isn’t limited to the courtroom. We also work to educate the public and policymakers about the ramifications of proposals that would limit access to information and expression. From working with allies to fight for better policies or against bad laws to advocating for people who build tools that protect speech, EFF’s activism makes sure technology is made and used in the service of free speech.

Empowering Free Expression with New Technologies

EFF also builds tools that enable people to access and express themselves on the Internet securely and anonymously, creates guides and education materials for vulnerable populations to learn about security tools, and embarks on projects to expose governments and corporate actors using malware and other technologies to intercept people’s online communications.

EFF’s projects include browser extensions such as Privacy Badger, which prevents cookies and other tracking devices from tracking you across websites, collecting data about your activities, and then selling or sharing that data with third parties and HTTPS Everywhere, created with the Tor Project, which redirects users to encrypted versions of websites so that outside actors cannot intercept and spy on their web traffic.

Because tools are only useful if people know how to use them, our experts also create guides and training materials for people to help their own communities learn about security. EFF also researches how governments and private actors create, purchase, and use malware, IMSI catchers, and other spying technologies.

As technology grows and changes, it’s important that it not reinforce obstacles to free speech, but allows everyone to share ideas and experiences safely.













Free Speech Highlights

Free Speech is Only as Strong as the Weakest Link

From Mubarak knocking a country offline by pressuring local ISPs to PayPal caving to political pressure to cut off funding to WikiLeaks, this year has brought us sobering examples of how online speech can be endangered. And it’s not only political speech that is threatened – in the United...

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

47 U.S.C. § 230, a Provision of the Communication Decency ActTucked inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 is one of the most valuable tools for protecting freedom of expression and innovation on the Internet: Section 230.This comes somewhat as a surprise, since the original purpose of the...

Free Speech Updates

Free Speech banner, an colorful graphic representation of a megaphone

Merkey v. Yahoo SCOX Groklaw et. al.

EFF defended anonymous online speakers from frivolous subpoenas. After suing Internet users who had allegedly made critical comments about him on message boards and blogs, a Utah man asked the court to let him subpoena the names of the anonymous "John Doe" critics. The Utah District Court agreed with EFF...

Mobilisa v. Doe

Software development company seeks identity of John Doe who obtained email initially sent by company's CEO to his mistress and forwarded the email to company employees.

MoveOn Brave New Films v. Viacom

EFF and Stanford Law School's Fair Use Project (FUP) asked a federal court on March 22 2007 to protect the free speech rights of MoveOn.org Civic Action and Brave New Films after their satirical send-up of "The Colbert Report" was removed from YouTube following a baseless copyright complaint from media...

Naas v. Anonymizer et al.

Complaint filed in an Ohio lawsuit against Anonymizer.com (a provider of anonymous Internet service) and several other parties (mostly John Doe defendants) in which a defamed plaintiff attempts to hold the service provider liable for third parties' defamatory statements.

Free Speech banner, an colorful graphic representation of a megaphone

Nitke v. Ashcroft

Nitke et. al. v. Ashcroft challenges the obscenity provisions in the Communications Decency Act (CDA). Barbara Nitke a New York photographer who works with erotic subject matter has joined with the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom in a suit that attacks the constitutionality of provisions in the CDA that create...

Pages

Back to top

JavaScript license information