Sites like Facebook and Twitter provide users with a place to share personal information with friends family and the public — an activity that's proven to be hugely compelling to Internet users. In response to the demand technology is evolving to encourage the disclosure of information that was formerly discreet (like location) and to enable the sharing of information even when not sitting in front of a traditional computer (like from mobile phones).
But it doesn't take much forethought to realize that there are countless privacy pitfalls in a world where a near-endless stream of personal bits is indiscriminately posted indefinitely stored and quietly collected and analyzed by marketers, identity thieves, and professional government snoops in America and abroad. The public controversies that have erupted to date — Facebook's drastic terms of service changes and Google Buzz's forced sharing of email contacts — are only the first snares in a rapidly growing thicket of social networking privacy issues.
Here are some of the ways EFF is working to protect your privacy as the use of social networks grows:
- EFF has gone toe-to-toe with the government to uncover hidden details about how they use social networking sites for investigations data collection and surveillance.
- EFF works to expose issues with social networks as soon as they emerge from the leaking of information to advertisers or the policies of the sites themselves.
- EFF helps savvy users better understand how to strengthen their privacy online and opt out of information sharing.
EFF Related Content: Social Networks
- In a phone interview, Mitch Stoltz, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the NAA's claim falls into a bit of a gray area. "Cases have gone both ways on this point," he said, noting that in some instances where websites have presented content in a frame, that's...
- The rule could run up against First Amendment issues. Dave Maass, a researcher with the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has studied inmate social media regulations, said he thought the rule was unconstitutionally broad. “This policy violates the free speech rights of both the inmates and the family members and friends...
- “Even if the FBI loses this case, what they have won is ammunition,” says Nate Cardozo, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. “They will take that loss to Congress, to say ‘we need to mandate back doors by law.'”
- Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Jeremy Malcolm and Techonomy chief executive officer David Kirkpatrick discuss if India is in violation of net neutrality after banning Facebook’s free basics with Emily Chang on “Bloomberg West.”
- “The problem with Free Basics service was that it centralized control of the Internet with a single gatekeeper – Facebook and its partners – that introduced a whole range of problems, creating a new barrier to content providers that have to register with Facebook,” Malcolm told Al Jazeera. “That in...