Data Request from Lebanese Security Agency Sparks Controversy
A controversy arose in Lebanon this past week over revelations that the country's Internal Security Forces (ISF) demanded the content of all SMS text messages sent between Sept ember 13 and November 10 of this year, as well as usernames and passwords for services like Blackberry Messenger and Facebook. The requests were submitted to the Ministry of Telecommunciations.
Lebanon’s Telecommunications Minister, Nicolas Sehnaoui, took to Twitter December 3 to rally his followers against the privacy-invasive data request. “RT, SHARE, EMAIL, BLOG,” Sehnaoui urged. “Use ANY means you find fit to say ‘As a Lebanese Citizen I refuse to give up on my Internet Privacy’ #ProtectPrivacy.” Retweeted more than 300 times, his post seemed to capture the attention of those not yet aware that the ISF’s Information Branch had issued this outrageous blanket demand for digital communications data.
The debate is politically charged, and there are many factors at play. But at the end of the day, this ISF request is represents an egregious privacy violation of millions of Lebanese citizens.
"To catch a killer, you don't put everybody under accusation until you find the killer,” says Mohamad Najem, cofounder of an organization that provides social media consulting to Lebanese non-profits for political empowerment. “It is not acceptable for the ISF to dig into who was talking to whom on mobile applications."
Al-Akhbar, a daily Arabic paper, quoted Sehnaoui's description of the data request. “They want user data: the usernames and passwords of Lebanese who use the Internet in Lebanon, in addition to information about service providers and entry points to the Internet,” the minister said. “Surely, we cannot agree to making such information available and violate the privacy of Internet users.”
As-Safir, another Lebanese newspaper, reported that the matter had been referred to Lebanon’s Council of Ministers.
While the news about the data request broke this week, the request was made earlier this year. The ISF justified its overbroad request by saying it would help generate leads in the investigation of a fatal car bombing that occurred in Beirut Oct. 19. In that attack, the intelligence chief of the ISF and a senior official linked to Lebanon’s anti-Syrian regime camp, General Wissam al-Hassan, was killed.
Rather than request user data only for persons suspected to be linked to the attack, the ISF apparently attempted to collect the information of every single mobile subscriber and Internet user in Lebanon. This constitutes an outrageous violation of privacy, and the hundreds of tweets reflecting the #ProtectPrivacy hashtag demonstrates that Lebanese citizens and supporters around the world are taking a stand against it.
"I don't think the council of ministers will approve the request,” Najem speculated, “but I'm worried that they will get to a middle ground and hand over the SMS data. If they give them the SMS, it will reveal for 3.7 million mobile users in Lebanon who texted whom, when, and the contents of the messages."
The ISF’s response to the criticism has been to trot out the oft-repeated false dichotomy between individual privacy and security. According to an As-Safir Newspaper article highlighted on independent news site Lebanon Now, “A high-ranking security source … [who] requested to remain anonymous, told As-Safir that the state has to choose [whether] security in general or preserving [people’s] privacies are priorities.”
Meanwhile, questions about exactly what the ISF asked for – and, for that matter, whether the security agency could even obtain the information it sought simply by asking a Lebanese government agency – seem far from settled.
In an article published Dec. 5 by The Daily Star of Lebanon, an unnamed senior security official confirmed that the ISF had requested the content of all text messages sent in a two-month timeframe overlapping the attack – but denied that the ISF had asked for any Internet-based information at all.
At the same time, independent news site Elnashra published a set of documents earlier this week that it described as “leaked official documents that specify the request that was provided to the Ministry of Information.” The above link takes you to Elnashra’s news site, where Arabic documents are displayed with relevant English words inserted. The first few lines of the Elnashra article are translated into English below:
“This leaked request asks the Ministry of Information to turn over the contents of all ‘DATA Sessions,’ Meaning the Data sessions of all 3G and 2G data subscribers in Lebanon. These include log files. The log files detail access to Internet websites and IP addresses. Aside from the log files, the requests ask for usernames, phone numbers, addresses, names, passwords, and so on. The request asks for personal information including the applications that are used on the mobile phones of subscribers. The request asks for all data of this nature within the time-frame of 13/9/2012 until 10/11/2012.’”
And Senhaoui has stated that the government doesn’t even have all the information the ISF is after. “There is some data which can be collected by the ministry, but the rest must be gathered directly from the companies involved,” he told Al-Akhbar.
EFF is concerned about the privacy implications of this overreaching request, and stands with Lebanese citizens who are standing up for their right to privacy on the Internet.
Recent DeepLinks Posts
Jul 22, 2016
Jul 21, 2016
Jul 21, 2016
Jul 21, 2016
Jul 21, 2016
- Abortion Reporting
- Analog Hole
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
- Bloggers' Rights
- Broadcast Flag
- Broadcasting Treaty
- Cell Tracking
- Coders' Rights Project
- Computer Fraud And Abuse Act Reform
- Content Blocking
- Copyright Trolls
- Council of Europe
- Cyber Security Legislation
- Defend Your Right to Repair!
- Development Agenda
- Digital Books
- Digital Radio
- Digital Video
- DMCA Rulemaking
- Do Not Track
- E-Voting Rights
- EFF Europe
- Electronic Frontier Alliance
- Encrypting the Web
- Export Controls
- Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the Balance
- FAQs for Lodsys Targets
- File Sharing
- Fixing Copyright? The 2013-2016 Copyright Review Process
- Free Speech
- Genetic Information Privacy
- Government Sabotage of Digital Security
- Hollywood v. DVD
- How Patents Hinder Innovation (Graphic)
- International Privacy Standards
- Internet Governance Forum
- Know Your Rights
- Law Enforcement Access
- Legislative Solutions for Patent Reform
- Locational Privacy
- Mandatory Data Retention
- Mandatory National IDs and Biometric Databases
- Mass Surveillance Technologies
- Medical Privacy
- Mobile devices
- National Security and Medical Information
- National Security Letters
- Net Neutrality
- No Downtime for Free Speech
- NSA Spying
- Offline : Imprisoned Bloggers and Technologists
- Online Behavioral Tracking
- Open Access
- Open Wireless
- Patent Busting Project
- Patent Trolls
- PATRIOT Act
- Pen Trap
- Policy Analysis
- Public Health Reporting and Hospital Discharge Data
- Reading Accessibility
- Real ID
- Search Engines
- Search Incident to Arrest
- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
- Social Networks
- SOPA/PIPA: Internet Blacklist Legislation
- State-Sponsored Malware
- Student Privacy
- Stupid Patent of the Month
- Surveillance and Human Rights
- Surveillance Drones
- Terms Of (Ab)Use
- Test Your ISP
- The "Six Strikes" Copyright Surveillance Machine
- The Global Network Initiative
- The Law and Medical Privacy
- TPP's Copyright Trap
- Trade Agreements and Digital Rights
- Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
- Travel Screening
- Trusted Computing
- UK Investigatory Powers Bill
- Video Games