November 11, 2011 | By Trevor Timm

EFF Asks Supreme Court to End the FCC’s Indecency Regulations

Yesterday, EFF—along with the Cato Institute, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Public Knowledge, and TechFreedom—submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in FCC v. Fox, which asks the Court to declare unconstitutional the FCC’s heavy-handed and outdated indecency policy for broadcast TV.  The policy stems from the 1978 Supreme Court decision in FCC v. Pacifica, also known as the “Seven Dirty Words” case. The Court held that broadcast media deserved lesser First Amendment protection than other mediums because it had a “uniquely pervasive presence in the lives of all Americans” and was “uniquely accessible to children.”

But as the Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted, “we face a media landscape that would have been almost unrecognizable in 1978.” Back then, the public could consume media in two ways: through broadcast television and radio or newspapers.  Now, over three-quarters of all Americans use the Internet, and 87% of households now subscribe to cable or satellite.

Nor is broadcast media “uniquely accessible to children” either. Upwards of 87% of U.S. children ages 12 to 17 use the Internet.  And as our brief notes, “when children watch broadcast content, they do so increasingly using non-broadcast platforms.”

This is not an issue that draws down political lines—both right and left can agree: the First Amendment belongs to all mediums. In 2011, there is simply no reason for the court not to give broadcast television the full First Amendment protection provided to the Internet.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Digital rights groups team up with tech companies to fight California's misguided virtual currency license: https://eff.org/r.w8ei

Aug 28 @ 11:52am

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals says there's a standing problem in Klayman v. Obama—but the case isn't over yet: https://eff.org/r.683p

Aug 28 @ 11:16am

We protested and defeated an Internet power grab in 2012. It's happening again—why aren't we talking about it? https://eff.org/r.hxui

Aug 28 @ 10:00am
JavaScript license information