May 3, 2006 | By Derek Slater

Listen To The Apple v. Does Oral Arguments

On April 20, EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl argued the critical issues in Apple v. Does before a San Jose, California appeals court, telling a panel of three judges that denying confidential source protection to journalists -- whether online or offline -- would deliver a dangerous blow to all media. The judges hearing the arguments asked tough questions and seemed to understand the high stakes for free speech in this case, and we are looking forward to their decision.

Now you can hear the arguments for yourself. The audio transcript is available in mp3 or ogg formats here. EFF breaks down its arguments in the opening, and the incisive questioning of Apple and its supporter Intel starts around 25 minutes in.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Sen. @OrrinHatch explains why today's SCOTUS argument on patent venue is a troll-sized big deal. https://www.wired.com/2017/03...

Mar 27 @ 6:44am

Got questions about the #BroadbandPrivacy repeal being voted on tomorrow? Follow our reddit AMA and take action.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA...

Mar 27 @ 5:43am

In Portland, Oregon? Come meet EFF staffers @amullionaire and @j4cob for a panel discussion TONIGHT

Sign up here: https://www.meetup.com/Portla...

Mar 26 @ 3:04pm
JavaScript license information