June 16, 2004 | By Fred von Lohmann

INDUCE Act = Hollings II?

Rumor has it that Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) will be introducing a bill tomorrow that would add a new Section 501(g) to the Copyright Act granting copyright owners a cause of action against those who "induce" copyright infringement (cf. patent law). This bill, dubbed the INDUCE Act, would apparently also reach those who "counsel" infringers.

Even a moment's reflection should make the danger to innovators clear -- you now have to worry not just about contributory and vicarious liability, but an entirely new form of liability for building tools that might be misused. It will be interesting to see whether the bill expressly precludes any Betamax-type defense. This may also pose First Amendment problems, to the extent a journalist or website publisher might be liable for simply posting information about where infringement tools might be found or how to use them.

It's the Hollings Bill by other means -- an over-reaching new form of indirect liability that will force technology companies of all kinds to "ask permission" before innovating for fear of ruinous litigation if they don't.

And so another front in the copyright wars opens, with the aggressors waving the bloody flag of file sharing, but really aiming at a much bigger target. Stay tuned.

UPDATE: Prof. Susan Crawford has helpfully posted draft text of the bill.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The terrible trade agreement called the TPP shouldn't mess with orphan works. Here's why: https://eff.org/r.ciwt

Sep 4 @ 3:22pm

Californians, help defend the privacy of your digital devices. Tell law enforcement to get a warrant: https://eff.org/r.oyx

Sep 4 @ 12:58pm

FTC Commissioner @TMcSweenyFTC is right. Consumers need strong encryption: https://eff.org/r.vtyv

Sep 4 @ 12:44pm
JavaScript license information