KSR v. Teleflex

Teleflex Inc. sued the defendant KSR International, claiming that one of KSR's products infringed its patent on connecting an adjustable vehicle control pedal to an electronic throttle control. KSR argued that merely combining these two elements was obvious and therefore not patentable. KSR won at the district court level only to have the opinion overturned by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in January 2005.

Oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court on November 28, 2006. The petitioner KSR was represented by James W. Dabney. Deputy solicitor general Thomas G. Hungar represented the government, which sided with the petitioner. Thomas C. Goldstein argued on behalf of the respondent Teleflex.  EFF filed an amicus brief supporting KSR.

On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit.  The Court held that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents." The Supreme Court disapproved the Federal Circuit's strict application of its "teaching-suggestion-motivation" (TSM) test, and therefore made it easier to invalidate patents as obvious.

via Wikipedia.org

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Hundreds attend EFA launch events in 9 cities across the U.S. this month: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 7:12pm

Voicemail-to-text services have been around since at least 2001. Why was a patent for them issued in 2006? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 9:12am

Learn about Rule 41, the scary new route the government could use to hack your computer: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Apr 30 @ 8:48am
JavaScript license information