Craigslist v. Superior Court of California

EFF and a coalition of public interest groups and law professors have asked a California appeals court to protect craiglist from a lawsuit that could spur websites to be less helpful in responding to complaints about user behavior.

In Scott P. v. craigslist Inc. the plaintiff complained about a series of craiglist ads he said were written by impersonators. While craigslist removed the ads within minutes of his phone calls the plaintiff sued contending that craigslist broke a promise to "take care of it" when the impersonators posted additional ads. In cases like these federal law -- specifically Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act -- shields Internet forums like craigslist from liability. Section 230 was designed to encourage parties to pursue action against those who created the questionable content instead of the platform that hosted it. But the California Superior Court has ruled that this case can continue because of the plaintiff's allegations that craiglist said it would help.

Craiglist filed a writ petition with the Court of Appeal for the State of California arguing that the trial court should have dismissed the case because of Section 230's protections for forum hosts. In an amicus letter filed in support of craigslist EFF argues that the lower court reasoning could create a hole in Section 230 discouraging forum owners from helping users.

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

New Zealand confirms half the TPP countries will be forced to extend copyright term by 20 years. We have to stop it.

Oct 6 @ 3:37pm

Attending a protest anywhere in the U.S.? Know your rights and protect your data:

Oct 6 @ 2:19pm

EFF urges the California Supreme Court to review a decision that could criminalize artistic speech

Oct 6 @ 12:49pm
JavaScript license information