Perfect 10 v. Google

Adult entertainment publisher Perfect 10 sued Google's Image Search service arguing that Google violates copyright law by indexing Perfect 10 photos posted on unauthorized websites then making and delivering thumbnail images of those photos in its search results. Perfect 10 also contends that Google should be held liable for any copyright infringement that occurs on sites that Google links to.

In February 2006 the district court ruled in favor of Google on several grounds but ruled against Google for its creation of thumbnails. EFF filed an amicus brief for itself and several library associations supporting Google.

Both sides subsequently appealed and EFF filed an amicus brief on behalf of itself and library associations supporting Google. On May 16 2007 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed Internet innovators and users of all stripes a major victory in Perfect 10 v. Google (the opinion was subsequently amended on December 3 2007). While it leaves some questions open the bottom line is that the Court upheld important policies of fair use and freedom online and resisted Perfect 10's plea to put copyright owners completely in charge of how and when search engines and other online intermediaries can provide their users with links to images.

For a more complete description of the court of appeals ruling take a look at our Deep Link regarding the decision.

After the appeal the case was remanded back to the district court to decide whether Google is liable for contributory infringement. The case remains pending as of August 2008.

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Apple shows that privacy-threatening cloud computing and data collection do not have to be the industry standard. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 27 @ 4:51pm

Our friends at @calyxinstitute are doing exciting things with nonprofit access to 4G spectrum. https://boingboing.net/2016/0...

Sep 27 @ 4:20pm

Why do the changes to Rule 41 matter? We explain through the example of the "Playpen" government hacking cases. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 27 @ 3:53pm
JavaScript license information