EFF in the News
Kevin Bankston, with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, represented plaintiffs suing the NSA. He argued that his clients suffered "concrete injuries" from having their communications intercepted and that the district court wrongly found those injuries represented a "generalized grievance."
Lawyers for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [advocacy website] on Wednesday urged the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] in Seattle to preserve two lawsuits over the warrantless surveillance of US citizens.
Appearing before the court in Seattle, EFF Legal Director Cindy Cohn and Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston argued against the dismissal of EFF's two lawsuits, Hepting v. AT&T and Jewel v. NSA, along with the 32 other cases against various telecommunications carriers.
While the EFF believes running a Tor "exit node is legal," its Tor Challenge stated, "Exit relays raise special concerns because the traffic that exits from them can be traced back to the relay's IP address."
Yesterday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) delivered oral arguments in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, urging the court to preserve lawsuits challenging the U.S. government’s massive domestic spying program led by the National Security Agency (NSA).
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) urged the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to preserve lawsuits challenging the government's illegal mass surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation points to a skeptical June Congressional Research Service report stating, "One of the biggest challenges facing policymakers is how to determine whether the NSI program is successful .
Another round of litigation, brought by the EFF and others, targets the government, accusing federal officials of violating the Fourth Amendment rights of anybody who so-much as sent an e-mail in the years following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
This past Monday, EFF, Public Knowledge and other public interest groups filed an emergency petition with the FCC, calling on the Commission to “Issue a declaratory ruling clarifying that such shutdowns by local governments violate the [amended Communications Act of 1934]” with respect to BART’s pre-emptive cell phone blackout before the BART protests.