EFF in the News
The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Democracy and Technology, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have labeled cases like this one "CyberSLAPPs": frivolous lawsuits with the sole purpose of issuing a subpoena to a Web site or Internet Service Provider (ISP) to discover the identity of an anonymous critic and to intimidate or silence them. Cohen's decision to drop her lawsuit a day after she filed it and publicized Port's name lends credence to that label.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) mapped more than 650 organizations that can issue certificates which will be accepted, directly or indirectly, by Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Mozilla's Firefox. The EFF will soon launch the SSL Observatory Project, "an effort to monitor and secure the cryptographic infrastructure of the World Wide Web. There is much work to be done, and we will need the help of many parties to make the HTTPS-encrypted web genuinely trustworthy... Browsers trust a very large number of these CAs, and unfortunately, the security of HTTPS is only as strong as the practices of the least trustworthy/competent CA."
The EFF now argues in its brief that, "Unless corrected, the District Court's ruling risks creating a perverse incentive for the government to violate the privacy rights of as many citizens as possible in order to avoid judicial review of its actions."
Computer security researchers are raising alarms about vulnerabilities in some of the Web’s most secure corners: the banking, e-commerce and other sites that use encryption to communicate with their users....
“It is becoming one of the weaker links that we have to worry about,” said Peter Eckersley, a senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an online civil liberties group.
“I’d say very few people know about geotag capabilities,” said Peter Eckersley, a staff technologist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, “and consent is sort of a slippery slope when the only way you can turn off the function on your smartphone is through an invisible menu that no one really knows about.”
Cindy Cohn at the EFF has published an extensive—but easy-to-read—analysis of the positives and negatives in Google and Verizon's 'net neutrality proposal.
Meanwhile, the Electronic Frontier Foundation likes Google and Verizon's idea of giving the Federal Communications Commission a very narrow mandate to regulate the Internet. This would solve what the EFF calls the "Trojan Horse problem" where net neutrality regulations give the FCC too much control over the Internet.
But the EFF isn't so hot on the rest of the Google-Verizon proposal. Its biggest complaints are with the proposals that let carriers have "reasonable network management" and allow only "lawful content" on their networks.
However, the Google-Verizon proposal has a bevy of items that make sense on the wireline front. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a nice analysis of the nuances here and at least tries to cut through the clutter....Overall, the Google-Verizon missive isn’t all that jarring—until you get to the wireless part of the net neutrality issue. Then the technology peanut gallery goes nuclear. Is Google really “carrier-humping net neutrality surrender monkey“?
"A company like RIM really needs to think not just about the UAE or Saudi Arabia, but about their customers worldwide," said Cindy Cohn, legal director and general counsel for digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation. "If BlackBerry is willing to offer backdoor access (in the Gulf), other countries are going to want that too. And at that point it's really a race to the bottom."
Less understood, but equally important is the work of groups like EFF.org who is working to expand the public's digital domain and copy rights.