EFF in the News
Jillian York is the director for international freedom of expression with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. She said a lot of the content takedowns they've seen involved nudity or sexual content, citing a couple of famous examples from earlier this year. "A photo of the Little Mermaid statue in Copenhagen was censored from Facebook. It's a mermaid, so not really human nudity," she noted.
It should bother anyone who believes in government transparency that MassIT is withholding records on the basis that they will alert the public to the existence of other records. Aaron Mackey, a legal fellow with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, agrees. He says that to safeguard personal privacy, the government should not be allowed to keep secret databases—whether for “benign or nefarious” purposes. He pointed to the ’60s and ’70s, when the government kept detailed dossiers on anti-Vietnam war activists. “The idea is that the public should know what type of information the government is maintaining about them,” he says. Releasing the list would actually be a “public service,” according to Mackey.
Section 230 of the Act guarantees that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” Judges have affirmed that Section 230 means online platforms cannot be held responsible for what is published by their users. So much of the law is so well established,” said David Greene, the civil liberties director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation said, that “many cases are not even brought now.” The EFF often advises courts to broadly interpret Section 230 in defense of web publishers.
"No one knows what the heck that Trump is going to do," said Sophia Cope, a staff attorney on the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "To the extent that he feels that weakening encryption is an important policy goal for him, he's going to find a way to do that.
Cindy Cohn, Executive Director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is also calling for Trump to listen to security experts on encryption policy. "We desperately need leadership that recognizes that empowering users and companies to provide the strongest security and creating incentives for them to do so is the best way for us to actually be more secure," she says.
MTV music writer, Hazel Cills, asks Jillian C. York of the Electronic Frontier Foundation how we can protect our data and digital spaces from surveillance.
Silicon Valley should work with the US government in Washington to
arrive at a solution that gives law enforcement access to encrypted
comms, but that respects individual privacy. That's according to former White House
counterterrorism and cybersecurity official Daniel Rosenthal, who was
debating where the issue of encryption should go next. Nonsense, responded Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), on stage at the Versus
conference in San Francisco. If the tech sector offers some form of
compromise now, the government will only come asking for more later.
Apple may have refused to help the FBI unlock an iPhone used by the San Bernardino shooter, but the tech industry is still better off working with the U.S. government on encryption issues than turning away, according to Daniel Rosenthal, who served as the counterterrorism director in the White House until January this year. However, Rosenthal’s comments were met with resistance from Cindy Cohn, executive director for Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy advocate. She also spoke at the talk and opposed government efforts to weaken encryption, saying it “dumbs down” security. “This idea of a middle ground that you can come up with an encryption strategy that only lets good guy into your data, and never lets a bad guy into your data, misunderstands how the math works,” she said.
The business-focused global social network LinkedIn faces being blocked
in Russia after a court ruled that it broke a new Russian law on data
storage. The new law is contained within surveillance legislation signed by President Vladimir Putin in July 2014. Eva Galperin, from the U.S.-based nongovernmental Electronic Frontier
Foundation (EFF), says non-Russia-based messaging services and
social-media platforms cannot reasonably comply with Russia's new laws
because of the prohibitive costs of new servers to store the enormous
amounts of data required.
A California judge has agreed to give the
state attorney general's office more time to persuade him that the
operators of what she called "the world's top online brothel" should
face charges of pimping after he tentatively rejected them in a ruling. Sacramento County Superior Court Judge
Michael Bowman said, however, in a tentative ruling Wednesday that
Harris lacked authority to bring the charges because the federal
Communications Decency Act, as a way of promoting free speech, grants
immunity to website operators for content posted by users.
The section of the Communications Decency
Act that applies to the case protects websites from content posted by
third parties, said David Greene, civil liberties director for the
Electronic Frontier Foundation. It immunizes sites such as Yelp.com from
being held accountable for scathing reviews left by customers or online
news sites from vicious reader comments.