March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Apr 24 @ 5:10pm

Be careful with those security questions. A smart attacker would have no trouble finding your high school mascot. https://ssd.eff.org/en/module...

Apr 24 @ 3:30pm

Hyperlinking is not defamation. EFF files an amicus in Navalnyy v. Russia in the European Court http://www.mediadefence.org/n...

Apr 24 @ 2:57pm
JavaScript license information