March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Read this: Librarians who challenged National Security Letters in 2005 on why the Senate shouldn't expand NSL powers
http://www.courant.com/opinio...

Sep 28 @ 4:08pm

10,000 of you demanded that HP fix its self-destructing printers. Here’s its response. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 28 @ 3:49pm

Californians now have the right to challenge their inclusion in the CalGang database. Thank you, @jerrybrowngov https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 28 @ 3:08pm
JavaScript license information