March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

EFF, @AshleyJudd, and the @torproject have all called on ICANN to preserve domain privacy. You can too: https://eff.org/r.j2b5

Jul 7 @ 9:16am

California lawmakers want to appoint a “Chief Data Officer.” Here’s why that’s a great idea: https://eff.org/r.v6il

Jul 7 @ 8:39am

EFF will speak at Black Hat Briefings on both government surveillance and export controls. https://eff.org/r.nilc #BHUSA

Jul 6 @ 7:14pm
JavaScript license information