March 3, 2008 | By Kurt Opsahl

Washington Post Columnist Explains "Why Immunity Matters"

In today's Washington Post, Dan Froomkin's column examines the Bush Administration's "three-part argument for immunity, based on concerns about fairness, secrecy and future cooperation." As Froomkin notes, "all three parts of this argument are flawed," and rightly concludes that "none of these points argue for retroactive immunity." The column is a great addition to Dan Eggen and Ellen Nakashima's article in the Sunday Washington Post, which provides important background on the litigation and immunity debate.

Phone or email your Representative today -- urge them to oppose retroactive immunity.

Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Once again, @RIAA asks a court to order the entire world to block & filter an app they don't like. #SOPApower

Oct 13 @ 4:48pm

The JPEG Committee is considering ways to improve image privacy and security. Adding DRM to JPEG would do neither.

Oct 13 @ 4:35pm

These 21 tech companies have come out unequivocally against crypto back doors. Obama should join them.

Oct 13 @ 4:15pm
JavaScript license information