October 4, 2006 | By Cindy Cohn

Another Court Says "National Security" Isn't Blank Check for Illegal Spying

Today, a federal court shot down yet another attempt by the government to use "national security" as a blank check for illegal surveillance. Refusing a claim that the government could not even confirm or deny whether it had listened in on calls between attorneys at the Center for Constitutional Rights and their clients, the court ordered the government to provide that information to the court in secret first, then set up a process to possibly provide that information to the attorneys involved. The court confirmed: "It is a cardinal rule of litigation that one side may not eavesdrop on the other's privileged attorney-client communications."

That should have been obvious to the government from the beginning. But the fact that the government refused to confirm that it wasn't violating this "cardinal rule" protecting attorney-client communications should raise concerns for all of us. Kudos to yet another court for holding the government to the basic rule of law. The New York Law Journal has more details.

The government's overreaching attempts to prevent courts from considering cases where it asserts "national security" are now starting to fail, including, of course, in EFF's case against AT&T for helping the government's massive and illegal NSA spying program. Learn more here.

Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

The JPEG format succeeded because it was free, open, and interoperable. Why ruin a good thing with DRM? https://eff.org/r.6riw

Oct 13 @ 12:38pm

Join us in celebrating women's achievements in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: https://eff.org/lovelaceday2015

Oct 13 @ 12:36pm

Listen to EFF researcher @Maassive discuss newly signed California privacy laws on @kpbsmidday, live at 12:20pm PT https://eff.org/r.rg06

Oct 13 @ 11:46am
JavaScript license information