October 4, 2006 | By Cindy Cohn

Another Court Says "National Security" Isn't Blank Check for Illegal Spying

Today, a federal court shot down yet another attempt by the government to use "national security" as a blank check for illegal surveillance. Refusing a claim that the government could not even confirm or deny whether it had listened in on calls between attorneys at the Center for Constitutional Rights and their clients, the court ordered the government to provide that information to the court in secret first, then set up a process to possibly provide that information to the attorneys involved. The court confirmed: "It is a cardinal rule of litigation that one side may not eavesdrop on the other's privileged attorney-client communications."

That should have been obvious to the government from the beginning. But the fact that the government refused to confirm that it wasn't violating this "cardinal rule" protecting attorney-client communications should raise concerns for all of us. Kudos to yet another court for holding the government to the basic rule of law. The New York Law Journal has more details.

The government's overreaching attempts to prevent courts from considering cases where it asserts "national security" are now starting to fail, including, of course, in EFF's case against AT&T for helping the government's massive and illegal NSA spying program. Learn more here.


Deeplinks Topics

Stay in Touch

NSA Spying

EFF is leading the fight against the NSA's illegal mass surveillance program. Learn more about what the program is, how it works, and what you can do.

Follow EFF

Apple shows that privacy-threatening cloud computing and data collection do not have to be the industry standard. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 27 @ 4:51pm

Our friends at @calyxinstitute are doing exciting things with nonprofit access to 4G spectrum. https://boingboing.net/2016/0...

Sep 27 @ 4:20pm

Why do the changes to Rule 41 matter? We explain through the example of the "Playpen" government hacking cases. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks...

Sep 27 @ 3:53pm
JavaScript license information