In The News: 2007

December 31st, 2007

In the Fight Over Piracy, a Rare Stand for Privacy

Adam Liptak, New York Times

The record industry got a surprise when it subpoenaed the University of Oregon in September, asking it to identify 17 students who had made available songs from Journey, the Cars, Dire Straits, Sting and Madonna on a file-sharing network...

"People get pushed into settlements," said Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group. "The Oregon attorney general is showing what a real fight among equals would look like."

[Permalink]

December 29th, 2007

Piracy and Privacy

Dan Mitchell, New York Times

In an effort to stymie Internet pirates, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, a music industry group, is asking European lawmakers to require Internet service providers to use filters to block the illicit transfer of copyrighted material.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff.org), a privacy advocate, responded by sending a letter to the European Parliament arguing that such filters would be an “ineffective measure that will do little to practically address the concerns of major rights holders while imposing serious costs on the individual rights of European citizens.”

The filtering technology would not be effective, according to the foundation, because pirates would simply encrypt files to bypass it in the same way that banks encrypt credit card information. Meanwhile, legitimate users of copyrighted material would be hampered in their ability to post video and music clips. And the costs would most likely be borne by service providers, and, by extension, their customers, the foundation said.

[Permalink]

December 28th, 2007

Amazon Wrangles Warner Into No-DRM Club

Chris Maxcer, E-Commerce Times

Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) has picked up the third major record label to let the online music retailer sell MP3 songs without digital rights management (DRM) schemes attached. Warner Music Group announced Thursday that Amazon customers can now buy and download songs from its artists... Amazon.com's DRM-free music store, Amazon MP3, launched in September and now boasts 2.9 million songs from more than 33,000 record labels. The company hasn't reported sales figures, but Bill Carr, Amazon.com's vice president of Digital Music, said its customers are delighted with Amazon MP3 and that the company has received thousands of e-mails thanking the company for offering DRM-free MP3 tracks.

"Ironically, it seems that DRM-free music actually decreases piracy somewhat," Peter Eckersley, a staff technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation , told the E-Commerce Times. "There are two reasons for that. One is that despite burning billions of dollars on DRM, nobody has ever implemented a DRM system that prevents any media from being available to pirates -- once media is available to pirates, it can be copied without limit. The second reason is that DRM sucks for the users ... people often choose to pirate stuff not because of the price, or not just because of the price, but because the DRM ruins the product they would have bought," he explained.

[Permalink]

December 25th, 2007

China on the Web: An Accident Waiting to Happen?

Katherine Noyes, Technology News

One might argue that China and the Internet are both like high-speed trains. Both are growing at an extremely rapid pace, and both are apparently unstoppable global economic forces that are reshaping the economic landscape. Unfortunately, one might also argue that they are on a collision course.

The intense world scrutiny could help "cast a spotlight" on China's policies, Danny O'Brien, international outreach coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation , told the E-Commerce Times. On the other hand, "my fear is that it will also lead to more careful and secret repression, now that there's such strong pressure on the Chinese authorities to look 'cleaner than clean.'"

[Permalink]

December 23rd, 2007

User-friendly Apple shows a blogger its ruthless core

John Naughton, The Observor

Visitors to ThinkSecret.com, a well-known site which publishes rumours and gossip about forthcoming Apple products, found an intriguing notice on the front page last Thursday.
'Apple and ThinkSecret have settled their lawsuit, reaching an agreement that results in a positive solution for both sides,' it announced. 'As part of the confidential settlement, no sources were revealed and ThinkSecret will no longer be published. Nick Ciarelli, ThinkSecret's publisher, said: "I'm pleased to have reached this amicable settlement, and will now be able to move forward with my college studies and broader journalistic pursuits."'

AppleInsider and O'Grady's PowerPage fought back - with legal assistance from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) - arguing that the first amendment to the US Constitution protected them from being compelled to disclose their sources, a provision originally designed to protect journalists. Apple won at the first hurdle, but lost on appeal.

'The motion,' says Kurt Opsahl of the EFF, 'stopped Apple's lawsuit in its tracks and raised the prospect that Apple would have had to pay ThinkSecret substantial sums for its legal fees... While the court has never ruled, we believe the motion was meritorious, and Apple was looking at an embarrassing and expensive loss.'

[Permalink]

December 23rd, 2007

Web crew hits Dallas to snap street-level views

David Flick, Dallas Morning News

What Kory Dunton saw last week from behind the wheel of her Chevrolet, Tina Winslow will soon be able to access from her Mac Pro.
Ms. Winslow is intrigued by the prospect, but also a bit worried.

Stephen Chau, Google products manager, said Street View is an efficiency tool, allowing users to preview an unfamiliar neighborhood, judge whether parking will be a problem, even refresh their memories about what a restaurant or office building looks lik

But Rebecca Jeschke, a spokeswoman for the online privacy advocate Electronic Frontier Foundation, still has concerns.

"People are used to a certain amount of anonymity as they go about the day. They may be going to AA meetings, clinics, even hospitals," she said. "There are things you want to keep private."

[Permalink]

December 22nd, 2007

Jersey Judge Shields Anonymous Blogger

Paul McNamara, NetworkWorld.com

In a free-speech case that has drawn widespread attention, a New Jersey judge has upheld the right of a blogger to criticize county officials anonymously by telling those officials to take their subpoena seeking the author’s identity and put it where the sun don’t shine.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has been front and center in keeping Manalapan Township officials off the throat of this lonely pamphleteer. You can read all of the EFF’s legal filings about the case here.

"We're grateful that Judge Flynn upheld the First Amendment rights of our client and recognized that anonymous speakers should not be intimidated into silence through the discovery process," said EFF Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman in a press release. "Now 'daTruthSquad' can continue to discuss township business without fear of government reprisal."

[Permalink]

December 21st, 2007

Apple shuts down rumours website

BBC News

Apple has settled a legal row with tip site Think Secret that will see the website shut down.

The legal battle between Apple and the site blew up in January 2005 when Think Secret revealed details of the Mac Mini before its official unveiling.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) aided Think Secret in its legal fight to stop Apple forcing it to reveal its sources.

"I hope that Apple takes from this that it is neither useful nor wise to sue its fans," said Kurt Opsahl, an attorney for the EFF.

[Permalink]

December 20th, 2007

FBI E-Mail Shows Rift Over Warrantless Phone Record Grabs

Ryan Singel, Wired News

By now it's well known that FBI agents can't always be troubled to get a court order before going after a surveillance target's telephone and internet records. But newly released FBI documents show that aggressive surveillance tactics have even caused friction within the bureau.

The FBI tech agent's critical e-mail is best understood in light of the bureau's ongoing courtroom attempts to get cellphone location information without having to show probable cause, according to EFF lawyer Marcia Hofmann.

"For years the government has made dubious legal claims to justify tracking people's locations with minimal oversight," Hofmann said. "These docs show that the government hasn't satisfied its own weak standards in some cases."

[Permalink]

December 20th, 2007

FBI Email Shows Rift Over Warrantless Phone Record Grabs

Ryan Singel, Wired News

An internal email obtained by EFF from the FBI showed a field agent venting about his colleagues' assertive surveillance efforts, including attempts to sidestep court order requirements to get phone records from service providers.

[Permalink]

December 19th, 2007

FBI Recorded 27 Million FISA 'Sessions' in 2006

Ryan Singel, Wired Blog

EFF FOIA documents show that the FBI intercepted 27,728,675 "sessions" in fiscal year 2006 through surveillance technology that monitors telephone communications of suspected spies and terrorists. In contrast, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approved a mere 2,176 FBI requests for court-ordered surveillance in 2006.

[Permalink]

December 11th, 2007

Declassified Docs Show Fight Over Surveillance, Telecom Immunity

Declan McCullagh, CNET

Documents released through an EFF Freedom of Information Act suit revealed how high-level Administration officials have pushed Congress to amend federal surveillance law and immunize telecommunications companies from lawsuits based on their complicity in unlawful government surveillance.

[Permalink]

December 2nd, 2007

Software Helps Web Users Detect Interference

Associated Press Wire Service, Savannah Morning News

Increasingly worried over Internet providers' behavior, a nonprofit has released software that helps determine whether online glitches are innocent hiccups or evidence of deliberate traffic tampering.

The San Francisco-based digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation hopes the program, released Wednesday, will help uncover "data discrimination" - efforts by Internet providers to disrupt some uses of their services - in addition to the cases reported separately by EFF, The Associated Press and other sources.

"People have all sorts of problems, and they don't know whether to attribute that to some sort of misconfiguration, or deliberate behavior by the ISP," said Seth Schoen, a staff technologist with EFF.

[Permalink]

December 2nd, 2007

The Most Anti-Tech Organizations in America

Mark Sullivan, PC World

Their names keep coming up over and over again in courtrooms and corridors of power across the country--those groups whose interests always seem to run counter to those of technology companies and consumers. They come in many forms: associations, think tanks, money-raising organizations, PACs, and even other tech-oriented industries like telecommunications.

The RIAA and MPAA have exercised considerable political and economic influence to push a legal and policy environment in which the content owners keep tight control of the way their content is distributed and used. "I think it's fair to say that their approach is that any innovation that they haven't signed off on is bad," says Fred von Lohmann, senior intellectual property attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

November 29th, 2007

U.S. Judge Orders Bush to Release Records of Telecom Firm Contacts

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco Chronicle reported on a federal court's decision that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence must release records to EFF detailing contacts with telecommunications companies related to a lobbying campaign to immunize the carriers from lawsuits over their role in unlawful government surveillance of millions of Americans.

[Permalink]

November 21st, 2007

Souder Says Biometrics The Solution, But Others Curse The Cure

Matthew M. Johnson, Congressional Quarterly

Rep. Mark Souder has become a crusader for biometrics ID cards, but admits the political environment is not yet ripe for making them a part of Americans’ everyday life.

IDs encrypted with images of their holders’ fingerprints and irises would not only be the best tool to identify terrorists, says the Indiana Republican, but would go a long way toward helping people avoid the inconveniences associated with many homeland security initiatives.

...

“There are lots and lots of ways that biometrics are not as reliable and infallible as people tend to think they are,” said Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “I would argue that the burden of proof is on the proponents of biometrics to show that it is actually going to be workable as security.”

[Permalink]

November 19th, 2007

EFF, Others Ask Supreme Court To Reinstate "Patent Exhaustion Doctrine"

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Consumers Union, and Public Knowledge have joined forces and filed an amicus brief (PDF) in a pending Supreme Court case that could help set limits on the number of times in a single supply chain that a patent holder can profit from its patents.

...

The public interest groups that have now filed a brief in the case see this as part of a larger issue: when you buy a product, do you own it? Can you control it? Can you repair it? The EFF, in particular, has fought for consumer ownership in several recent cases, including Lexmark's attempt to restrict the market for refilling its pricey inkjet cartridges.

[Permalink]

November 18th, 2007

Internet Subdomain Patent Reexamination

Technology News

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has won reexamination from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) of a bogus patent on Internet subdomains -- the fourth successful reexamination request from EFF's Patent Busting Project.

...

"The hard work of open source developers should not be taken out of the public domain and used to threaten other legitimate innovators," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Jason Schultz, who heads EFF's Patent Busting Project. "Fortunately, the open source approach to development helped protect Apache and other web projects by creating the evidence needed to challenge this illegitimate patent."

[Permalink]

November 18th, 2007

What To Do When Goliaths Roar?

Randal Stross, New York Times

AS shoppers arm themselves for post-Thanksgiving bargain hunting later this week, they’ll also indulge in another, newer annual tradition: surfing the Web for advance information about Black Friday retail sales. By organizing sale prices from scattered newspaper circulars into a single database, the Internet has made it easy to search for particular items and compare prices — too easy, at least in the eyes of many major retailers.

...

Ms. Seltzer oversees the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse, a Web site that publicizes what it calls corporate misuse of cease-and-desist letters to curb legally protected speech on the Internet. The clearinghouse, sponsored by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the clinics of seven law schools, posts copies of cease-and-desist letters that Wal-Mart, Macy’s and others send to Web publishers. One aim of the project is to publicly shame companies that casually dash off the letters.

[Permalink]

November 16th, 2007

Ruling Blocks Challenge To Wiretapping

Eric Lichtblau, New York Times

WASHINGTON, Nov. 16 — A federal appeals court said today that secrecy laws forced it to exclude critical evidence about the National Security Agency’s domestic eavesdropping program from being used by an Islamic charity in a lawsuit even though the mere existence of the program could no longer be considered a “state secret.”

...

A lawyer for the group leading that part of the lawsuit, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said in an interview that he was heartened by the appeals court’s clear rejection of the government’s claim everything involved in the eavesdropping program should be considered a state secret. That could bode well for the remaining piece of the case, said the lawyer, Kevin Bankston.

[Permalink]

November 12th, 2007

Senate Judiciary Poised To Pass Total Information Awareness Bill

Elliot D. Cohen, BuzzFlash

Amid public outcry, in 2003, Congress defunded the Bush Administration's Total Information Awareness (TIA) project, a massive Orwellian technology-driven surveillance and data mining initiative. Now, it is attempting to pass through the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S. 2248), a bill that would effectively give legal standing and retroactive legal immunity to a major component of this project.

...

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a civil liberties organization based in San Francisco that has filed a class action suit against AT&T, the company had installed a fiber-optic splitter at its San Francisco office that copies all e-mails and other Internet traffic passing through the system and deposits these copies into a separate government computer network. The EFF alleges that the secret NSA rooms, to which the copies are sent, contain "powerful computer equipment connected to separate networks. This equipment is designed to analyze communications at high speed, and can be programmed to review and select out the contents and traffic patterns of communications according to user-defined rules" (emphasis added).

[Permalink]

November 7th, 2007

DHS May Be Lessening DHS Regulations

Renee Boucher Ferguson, eWeek

Media reports indicate that the agency is cutting back on some technology requirements and deadlines.

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer is among only a few of his peers to come out in support of the Bush administration's push for strict guidelines for state drivers' licenses, and is facing strong opposition in his plan to implement Real ID in the Empire State.

...

"There are a lot of issues of how [states] are supposed to do anything. How do you really verify a birth certificate? What does verification mean?" said Lee Tien, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

November 7th, 2007

AT&T To Get Tough On Piracy

Peter Burrows, BusinessWeek

It wants to incorporate antipiracy technology to protect video content and attract advertisers, but runs the risk of enraging privacy advocates and others.

AT&T (T) may soon beef up its antipiracy arsenal. The biggest U.S. telephone company is considering technology that could give it a heads-up when customers are watching partners' copyrighted video, BusinessWeek has learned. AT&T is in talks with NBC Universal and Walt Disney (DIS) about using the knowhow to guard against illegal distribution of their shows and films.

...

AT&T's approach is likely to raise the hackles of privacy advocates, who have already slammed the phone company for its role in helping the Bush Administration tap citizens' phone lines. "They better be very careful," warns Lee Tien, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "This is serious, serious stuff, to basically invade the privacy of all of your subscribers."

[Permalink]

November 7th, 2007

Yahoo May Be A Moral Pygmy, But Congress Is Hardly Better

Vindu Goel, San Jose Mercury News

Tuesday’s congressional hearing about Yahoo turning over information about two dissidents to the Chinese government got me all riled up — and not at Yahoo.

...

But Congress should think hard about how it’s undermining civil rights here at home before getting all holier-than-thou on U.S. companies trying to figure out how to do business in China, a place where the government’s power can be both murky and threatening.

“I wish Congress would put the practices domestically under the same magnifying glass,” said Danny O’Brien, international outreach coordinator at Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco group that has advocated for privacy rights around the globe. “This is an inconsistent position.”

[Permalink]

November 5th, 2007

The Advertiser Over Your Shoulder

Brock Read, The Chronicle

When they warn students about the perils of social networking, college officials often point out that prospective employers pore over profiles on MySpace and Facebook. And the sites themselves aren’t shy about doing the same.

...

The social networks are going public with their microtargeting strategies just a week after the Federal Trade Commission held a hearing to consider whether it should regulate online advertising more aggressively. Privacy advocates like the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy and Technology had asked the commission to create a “Do Not Track” registry that would prohibit companies from logging people’s Web usage for advertising purposes. (Facebook officials showed up at the hearing to discuss their privacy policies.)

[Permalink]

November 1st, 2007

Privacy Advos Demand 'Do Not Track' List For Websites

Joe Fay, The Register

A coalition of US privacy organisations has demanded the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) set up a "do not track" list to allow consumers to surf the web without having their behaviour monitored, warehoused, and mined by marketeers.

...

The coalition, which includes the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Centre for Democracy and Technology, has demanded customers be able to opt out of being tracked by advertisers, just as US consumers can sign up to a do not call list to escape telemarketers.

[Permalink]

October 24th, 2007

Cable Vendors Could Face Lawsuits for P2P Blocking

Egan Orion, The Inquirer

WE'VE SEEN well informed speculation by industry insiders that Comcast is not the only cable broadband provider engaged in blocking Peer-to-Peer (P2P) uploads as a "network management" tactic to hold down its bandwidth costs and so increase profits.
If so, they might also end up facing possible future class-action lawsuits by customers or an organisation acting in the public interest, which was mentioned as a likely development at a Cnet bog yesterday.

Fred von Lohmann, an Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney, said " based on [our] own testing, as well as what has been reported, it seems clear that Comcast's techniques are bad for its customers and bad for innovation generally." ... While the EFF is still studying the matter for now, von Lohmann said it has "already been contacted by attorneys who are considering legal action against Comcast."

[Permalink]

October 24th, 2007

Comcast Admits Delaying Some Traffic

Peter Svensson, Associated Press, USA Today

NEW YORK — Comcast on Tuesday acknowledged "delaying" some subscriber Internet traffic, but said any roadblocks it puts up are temporary and intended to improve surfing for other users.

...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation confirmed the AP's findings with its own tests — including spotting forged messages sent by Comcast's computers to shut down connections.

...

"These are the kinds of software bugs you get when you have ISPs messing around with hacking techniques to get some applications running on their networks and not others," said EFF's Eckersley, who is himself a Comcast subscriber.

[Permalink]

October 23rd, 2007

Comcast To Face Lawsuits Over BitTorrent Filtering

Chris Soghoian, CNET News.com

The blogosphere is abuzz over an Associated Press investigative article this past Friday on the subject of Comcast's BitTorrent filtering. Briefly, there were a number of articles in early September which alleged that Comcast was using some fairly sneaky techniques to throttle BitTorrent traffic on its network. Comcast, of course, denied any such behavior. It took a month and a half, but both a mainstream media news organization as well as the Electronic Frontier Foundation have tested and confirmed the previously reported claims. It turns out that Comcast is not only throttling BitTorrent, but Gnutella and, strangely, Lotus Notes are also suffering.

...

I discussed this issue with Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Von Lohmann stated that "based on (our) own testing, as well as what has been reported, it seems clear that Comcast's techniques are bad for its customers and bad for innovation generally. The fact that Comcast's efforts are reportedly interfering with BitTorrent, Gnutella and Lotus Notes communications makes it clear that they are not narrowly targeted at particular users or protocols."

[Permalink]

October 22nd, 2007

GPS is Turning Cellphones into Social Mapping Devices

Laura M. Holson, International Herald Tribune

Two new questions arise, courtesy of the latest advancement in cellphone technology: Do you want your friends, family, or colleagues to know where you are at any given time? And do you want to know where they are?

But such services point to a new truth of modern life: If GPS made it harder to get lost, new cellphone services are now making it harder to hide.

"There are massive changes going on in society, particularly among young people who feel comfortable sharing information in a digital society," said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, based in San Francisco.

"We don't know what the implications are," he added. "We seem to be getting into a period where people are closely watching each other, and there are privacy risks we haven't begun to grapple with."

[Permalink]

October 20th, 2007

Nacchio Affects Spy Probe

Andy Vuong, The Denver Post

Recent revelations about former Qwest chief executive Joe Nacchio's classified-information defense, which went unheard during his insider-trading trial, are feeding the furor over the government's warrantless-wiretapping program.
Nacchio alleges the National Security Agency asked Qwest to participate in a program the phone company thought was illegal more than six months before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to court documents unsealed at the request of The Denver Post.

Nacchio's claims could affect President Bush's controversial efforts to grant legal immunity to large telecommunications companies such as AT&T, which has been sued in connection with the surveillance program.

"The Nacchio materials suggesting that the NSA had sought telco cooperation even before 9/11 undermines the primary argument for letting the phone companies off the hook, which is the claim that they were simply acting in good faith to help the president fight the terrorists after 9/11," said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil-liberties group.

"The fact that these materials suggest that cooperation with the program was tied to the award of certain government contracts also contradicts their (phone companies') claims that they were simply acting in good faith to help fight the terrorists when it appears that they may have been motivated by financial concerns instead," Bankston said.

[Permalink]

October 19th, 2007

Studies Criticize Comcast For Upload Tampering

Wayne Freedman, ABC-7 San Francisco

Comcast is getting plenty of criticism after two separate studies found evidence the Internet giant is interfering with computers involved in peer-to-peer file sharing.

"The most common belief about this is they think file share users are using up too much of their network capacity," said Seth Shoen, Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"You know when you're making a telephone call, the phone company doesn't pop up in the middle of the call and start advertising to you or say 'we think you made too many calls today, so we're going to start adding some noise to your conversation," said Shoen.

[Permalink]

October 19th, 2007

Piracy Fuels Brazil's Tecno Scene

Michael Astor, San Francisco Chronicle

This steamy city at the mouth of the Amazon river is a haven for pirates — the digital kind who copy CDs and DVDs by the thousands for illegal sidewalk sales. Belem is also home to one of Brazil's most thriving pop scenes: tecnobrega, a musical movement that's expanding exponentially thanks to musicians and producers who see copying as a marketing tool rather than intellectual property theft.

"It's this really gritty tacky, sleazy jungle music. It's just genius," said John Perry Barlow, a former lyricist for the Grateful Dead and co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which advocates protecting free speech in the digital age... "It's making it possible for every kid in Brazil to know their songs by the time they turn five," Barlow said. "It's actually good for a lot of money — you give it away and it will come back. That's literally true with information, not with property."

[Permalink]

October 17th, 2007

The Truth About Telecom Amnesty

Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com

Today I interviewed Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the lead counsel in the pending litigation against AT&T, alleging that AT&T violated multiple federal laws by providing (without warrants) unfettered access for the Bush administration to all telephone and Internet data concerning its customers...
I found this interview extremely illuminating, and it reveals just how much misinformation is being disseminated by amnesty advocates.

I don't think it takes a lot of thought to wonder: "huh, the FISA law says that the exclusive means by which the Government can get information is either by a warrant or a short-term certification from the Attorney General in an emergency situation. Huh - do either of these two things justify ongoing wholesale surveillance of all of our customers for five years and counting?"

The answer to that has to be "no." I don't think you even need a law degree to figure that one out.

[Permalink]

October 15th, 2007

Verizon Freely Gave Phone Data to Feds Without Court Orders

Ellen Nakashima, Dallas News

Verizon Communications, the nation's second-largest telecom company, told congressional investigators that it has provided customers' telephone records to federal authorities without court orders hundreds of times since 2005.

The company said it does not determine the emergency requests' legality or necessity because to do so would slow efforts to save lives in criminal investigations.

Last month, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group in San Francisco, obtained records through a FOIA lawsuit showing that the FBI sought data from telecom companies about the calling habits of suspects and their associates, The New York Times reported.

[Permalink]

October 14th, 2007

Pentagon Review Faults Bank Record Demands

Mark Mazzetti and Eric Lichtblau, New York Times

Documents obtained by EFF through the Freedom of Information Act provided a glimpse into the Defense Department's use of National Security Letters to collect bank and credit information in certain Pentagon investigations. The documents revealed that the Defense Department has made systematic errors in its use of NSLs, much like those that the FBI has committed over the past few years.

[Permalink]

October 10th, 2007

FCC Takes a Pass on NSA Privacy Probe

Roy Mark, eWeek.com

The Federal Communications Commission will not pursue an investigation of telecoms cooperation with the National Security Agencys wiretapping activities. According to Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell, in Washington, such a probe would "pose an unnecessary risk of damage to national security."

In a related action involving the controversy, the Electric Frontier Foundation, based in San Francisco, announced on Oct. 5 it had hired two veteran Washington lobbyists to try to block amnesty for telecoms collaborating with the NSAs warrantless spying activities. The EFF is lead counsel in Hepting v. AT&T, one of many lawsuits aiming to hold telecommunications companies accountable for allegedly violating their customers privacy rights.

On Sept. 27, the EFF filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice, demanding any records of a telecom industry lobbying campaign to block lawsuits over their compliance with illegal electronic surveillance.

"The White House is publicly calling for immunity for the telecoms, while a recent Newsweek article detailed a secretive lobbying campaign to block the lawsuits," Marcia Hofmann, an EFF attorney, said in a statement. "If there are back room deals going on at the Department of Justice, then Americans need to know about them now, before Congress passes any law that gets the telecom companies off the hook."

[Permalink]

October 9th, 2007

For a Song

Chin Wong, Manila Standard Today

“FOR a song” is a phrase that means “cheaply”—but don’t tell that to Jammie Thomas. Last week, the 30-year-old unwed mother from Duluth, Minnesota, was found guilty of violating music industry copyrights and ordered to pay a total of $222,000 to six record companies for songs she had shared on her computer using Kazaa, a peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing network.

“Despite today’s verdict, tens of millions of Americans will continue sharing billions of songs, just as they have since Napster let the P2P genie out of the bottle nearly eight years ago,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation said after the Thomas decision. “Every lawsuit makes the recording industry look more and more like King Canute, vainly trying to hold back the tide.”

[Permalink]

October 8th, 2007

EFF to Weigh in on First RIAA Downloading Trial Appeal

David Kravets, Wired News

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is litigating the government's secret wiretap program, said Monday it will lend a legal hand to Jammie Thomas, the nation's first pirate to lose a federal jury trial in a case brought by the Recording Industry Association of America.

Fred von Lohmann, an EFF attorney, tells THREAT LEVEL that the San Francisco-based advocacy group will file a friend-of-the-court brief with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The brief might argue two points, surrounding Jury Instruction No. 15, which says: "The act of making copyrighted sound recordings available for electronic distribution on a peer-to-peer network, without license from he copyright owners, violates the copyright owners' exclusive right of distribution, regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown."

[Permalink]

October 8th, 2007

Amazon's Unlocked Music Still Might Get You Sued

Brier Dudley, Seattle Times

When Amazon.com launched its MP3 store last week, I thought the Seattle company had found the perfect formula for selling digital music.

Does that mean it's time to say goodbye to the neighborhood record store?

I'd say no, after reading the fine print in Amazon's user agreement. That's when I decided to keep buying CDs, maybe forever.

Concerned that I was being paranoid, I floated this past Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, a public-interest advocacy group.

He was surprised by the language and said it appears to enable record companies to pursue a breach of contract if, for instance, you loaned your mother an iPod containing MP3s bought from Amazon.

[Permalink]

October 4th, 2007

I Won’t Surrender to Download Bullies, Says Mother Fighting the Music Giants

Chris Ayres, Times Online

A single mother has made legal history by forcing America’s biggest record companies into a costly and potentially embarrassing trial after she refused to pay an out-of-court settlement for alleged music piracy...

Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer who specialises in intellectual property at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group, said that the RIAA’s legal campaign was having little effect. “I think by most any metric you choose, it’s been a failure,” he said.

[Permalink]

October 3rd, 2007

Darpa Hatches Plan for Insect Cyborgs to Fly Reconnaissance

R. Colin Johnson, EE Times

Cyborg insects with embedded microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) will run remotely controlled reconnaissance missions for the military, if its '"HI-MEMS" program succeeds... In a HI-MEMS world, cyborg bugs would patrol, gather intelligence, penetrate secret meetings, track targets, retrieve samples and more--all predicted by Easton's 1990 book.

However, also founded in 1990 was the watch-dog group, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF, San Francisco), which has more than a little trepidation about Darpa realizing Easton's dreams of cyborg bugs conducting ubiquitous surveillance.
"Anyone who is just a little bit creative can imagine both useful and non-productive applications of remote-controlled animals--especially if ordinary people will mistake them for normal animals," said Peter Eckersley, staff technologist at the EFF.

[Permalink]

October 2nd, 2007

New Fingerprint Tech Could Mean Never Losing Your Keys Again

By Alexis Madrigal, Wired News

Scientists in Great Britain hope you may never have to worry about losing your keys or forgetting your password again.

University of Warwick researchers have unveiled a new fingerprint recognition technology, which allows them to "unwarp" distorted prints...

No story about biometrics is complete without mentioning privacy concerns. As they say in business, if you can measure it, you can manage it. And not everyone wants to be managed, especially if the government or a big corporation has the calipers. As the Electronic Frontier Foundation summed it up, "Biometric technology is inherently individuating and interfaces easily to database technology, making privacy violations easier and more damaging."

[Permalink]

October 1st, 2007

FBI Surveillance Capability More Extensive Than Once Thought

JBS Staff, John Birch Society

Documents obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation have provided disturbing details about the extent of the FBI’s ability to monitor the communications of American citizens.

[Permalink]

September 28th, 2007

Machinima Licenses Spell Out New Rules for Creators

Monty Phan, Wired News

No recent event made a bigger splash in machinima makers' world than Tuesday's record-smashing release of Halo 3. But last month, a different kind of Microsoft release came pretty close.

In August, the company set forth guidelines (innocuously titled "Game Content Usage Rules") governing how its intellectual property could be used for such works as machinima...

Even digital rights advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation signed off on the rules. Then, a few weeks after Microsoft issued its guidelines, Blizzard Entertainment, the developer of World of Warcraft, came out with its own machinima guidelines.

Fred von Lohmann, an EFF senior staff attorney who examined both sets of rules, said the main difference between them lies in a user's base set of rights. Blizzard includes an end-user licensing agreement with its game, essentially stripping players of all rights regarding its use for anything other than how it was intended. Now the company has given rights back to the player in the form of the machinima license.

[Permalink]

September 28th, 2007

EFF sues the DOJ for withholding records of telecom surveillance immunity lobbying

Ryan Paul , Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Justice (DOJ) in an effort to obtain records that could shed light on telecommunication industry lobbying activities. The EFF suspects that major telecommunications companies like AT&T have attempted to use political leverage to compel lawmakers to support legislation that would grant the companies legal immunity for their involvement in the federal government's extralegal electronic surveillance program.

[Permalink]

September 28th, 2007

Apple's Options for Stopping Open Source iPhone Use

Brad Reed, Network World

Although Apple's Steve Jobs has declared war on iPhone hackers, no one knows for certain how he plans to stop them...

Seth David Schoen, a staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, thinks that fear of being prosecuted under the DMCA has proven effective in keeping several hobbyist open source developers from sharing their innovations on the Web.

[Permalink]

September 28th, 2007

EFF sues to uncover alleged telco lobbying

Stephen Lawson, InfoWorld

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) believes telecommunications carriers are pushing for an amnesty to protect them from lawsuits over alleged illegal wiretapping, and it is suing for the evidence...

The Bush administration has proposed granting amnesty retroactively to carriers who have helped the government in its antiterrorism spying efforts, said Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at EFF. Its proposals didn't make it into the recently passed Protect America Act of 2007, which expanded the government's power to intercept Americans' overseas communications without warrants, but could still be added to it, Opsahl said.

[Permalink]

September 26th, 2007

Ruling eases government's efforts for cell phone tracking

Linda Rosencrance , ComputerWorld

A federal court in Massachusetts has ruled that the government doesn't need probable cause to obtain a warrant allowing it to use a person's cell phone to track his past movements...

"This is the first decision that's been about historical tracking," said Jennifer Granick, civil liberties director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy advocacy group in Washington.

"The idea is that the government is using this information, that most people don't know their cell phone transmits, in order to track you, and they are arguing for an extremely low standard under this complicated statutory regime," Granick said. "Most people probably consider this information to be very private -- where you travel and where you've been. So the concern is for something so invasive, the government should have to demonstrate that it's information that they really need."

[Permalink]

September 26th, 2007

More Legal Perils in the Social Media World (Web 2.0)

Nina Kaufman, Entrepreneur

In some ways, the Internet is the Wild West . . . and Web 2.0 is like the Wild West meets the Sci-Fi Channel — unpredictable, potentially dangerous, and often bizarre. If you’re involved in, or thinking about, doing business online at all, the Electronic Frontier Foundation is a great resource. They’re even hosting a one-day Compliance Bootcamp on October 10, 2007 for people who handle issues arising from users and user-generated content.

[Permalink]

September 25th, 2007

Creationist vs. Atheist YouTube War Marks New Breed of Copyright Claim

Rob Beschizza, Wired News

A dispute between an atheist group and a creationist group over some postings on YouTube has critics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act crying foul. They say it's a new and inappropriate use of DMCA, which is becoming a frequent weapon in nasty political and cultural battles...

The videos were eventually reposted, and Rational Response Squad's account was reinstated. "The default, unfortunately, is that (sites like YouTube) take it down, and leave it to the user to issue a counter-notice," said Corynne McSherry, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "It was clearly fair use, and their claim was clearly bogus. It was just the fastest way they could think of to get it taken down."

[Permalink]

September 21st, 2007

Telcos seek wiretapping immunity as legal pressure mounts

Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica

Always eager to lighten the load of overworked bureaucrats, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has volunteered its services to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin. In a Wednesday letter, EFF legal director Cindy Cohn urged Martin to heed Rep. Ed Markey's request for an investigation into alleged lawbreaking by the nation's largest telecommunications carriers. Noting that EFF has been deeply involved in the controversy from its outset, Cohn offered to assist Martin in investigating the allegations.

[Permalink]

September 21st, 2007

U.S. collecting personal data on travelers

Dallas Morning News

The U.S. government is collecting much more detailed electronic records than previously disclosed on the travel habits of millions of Americans, according to documents obtained by a group of civil liberties advocates and statements by government officials...

But DHS TRIP does not allow a traveler to challenge an agency decision in court, said David Sobel, senior counsel with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has sued the DHS over information concerning the policy underlying the system. Because the system is exempted from certain Privacy Act requirements, including the right to "contest the content of the record," a traveler can't correct erroneous information, Mr. Sobel said.

[Permalink]

September 21st, 2007

Legal Issues Surrounding Online Music Storage

Michael Hoffman, Daily Tech

Are you worried about legal ramifications against online file locker services? I contacted the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization aimed at "defending freedom in the digital world," hoping to get a brief view of basic legal rights that users have.

The topic of users being safe from possible lawsuits is a hard topic to discuss, but "users are pretty safe," according to Fred von Lohmann, EFF senior staff attorney. "It'd be a long shot" to see the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) or other copyright holders attempt to take legal action against users.

[Permalink]

September 20th, 2007

Legal Suicide for Web 2.0 start-ups: A beginner's guide

Rafe Needleman, Webware

I got an email from Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation yesterday. It began, "Half the companies you blog about have copyright or privacy legal issues simmering just under the surface. Since most of them are thinly capitalized, when they get into trouble, they're likely to call EFF for legal advice. Several already have."

I called von Lohmann right away, since I've had a nagging feeling for months that too many of the interesting products I've been seeing were legally shaky. So I talked with him to come up with this list: 9 Fun Ways Web 2.0 Startups Can Commit Legal Suicide.

[Permalink]

September 20th, 2007

Drivers test paying by mile instead of gas tax

Larry Copeland, USA TODAY

Beginning early next year, drivers in six states will begin testing a new way to pay for roads and transit: Commuters will be charged for the miles they drive rather than paying taxes on gasoline purchased...

Privacy advocates worry about the use of satellite navigation technology to track drivers' movements. "Where you go is something that, for the most part, people consider private," says Lee Tien, an attorney who specializes in privacy issues for the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation. "The second point is, it's the sort of thing we do to the bad guys. Where do you hear a lot about GPS tracking? It's for prisoners or people who are out on probation."

[Permalink]

September 19th, 2007

Audio: Music biz's future rests on key changes

Bob Moon, Marketplace - NPR

When it comes to file sharing and illegal downloads, it's the big music labels that complain the loudest about being ripped off. Bob Moon reports on some ideas that might help the recording industry face the musical future.

(Featuring EFF's Fred von Lohmann)

[Permalink]

September 18th, 2007

Audio: Free? Illegal? ... What's the difference?

Bob Moon, Marketplace - NPR

Free doesn't always mean legal when you're downloading music. And critics say the recording industry's muddying the waters its spent years in court trying to clear up. Bob Moon reports.

(Featuring EFF's Fred von Lohmann)

[Permalink]

September 17th, 2007

Kevin Bankston | New threats to privacy

Patrick Marshall, Government Computer News

As a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of Kevin Bankston’s primary responsibilities is to monitor the effects of new technologies on citizens’ privacy rights and occasionally undertake litigation to protect those rights. Recently, he experienced the issue firsthand when he was, without his knowledge, photographed by Google Street View, and his image was posted online.

[Permalink]

September 17th, 2007

Audio: No pause in music industry's tough play

Bob Moon, Marketplace - NPR

The recording industry has gotten serious about illegal file sharing. In the last four years it has filed thousands of lawsuits. But, as Bob Moon reports in a special series, even those targeted by mistake, like Tanya Andersen, get no reprieve.

(Featuring EFF's Fred von Lohmann)

[Permalink]

September 12th, 2007

DirecTV faces setback in dubious antipiracy campaign. Good.

Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com

DirecTV lost an important case on Tuesday. Programmers, security researchers, and anyone who believes in a limited government won...

Now, I'm not arguing that we should be applauding blatant DirecTV piracy. Neither is the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which entered this case on the side of the defendants. If DirecTV can prove that Huynh and Oliver were watching TV shows for free, they should pay reasonable damages. But they shouldn't face six-figure fines for merely buying a smart-card programmer.

[Permalink]

September 12th, 2007

Unlocked iPhones For All

Andy Greenberg, Forbes.com

Seventeen-year-old George Hotz's much-publicized hacking of the iPhone involved ripping open his $600 device and diving in with a soldering iron--not a technique for the faint of heart...

But regardless of who has created unlocking software first, a larger question may be whether it's legal. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1999 prohibits users from circumventing technological locks that protect proprietary content. But in November 2006, Jennifer Granick, a cyber-law attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, won an exemption that makes it legal for users to break such locks to enable use of their phones on competing wireless networks.

[Permalink]

September 12th, 2007

Ready or Not, Voting Paper Trail Nears House Vote

Roy Mark, eWeek

The House of Representatives may vote as early as next week on legislation requiring a paper trail for electronic voting machines, according to a spokesman for bill sponsor Rush Holt, D-N.J. If successful in Congress, the bills provisions would take effect in time for the 2008 elections...

"Our support for H.R. 811 is tempered by profound disappointment that one of the bills pillars has been watered down to the point of ineffectiveness due to pressure from the proprietary software industry," the EFF said in a statement on its Web site.

The EFF added, "Having litigated cases in which prompt access to voting system source code is critical, EFFs strong advocacy for this bill has been based in large part on the source code disclosure requirement."

[Permalink]

September 12th, 2007

Court allows limited fines for theft of DirecTV signal

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle

People who use equipment to watch satellite television without paying for it can be fined up to $10,000, but they aren't subject to a commercial piracy law aimed at manufacturers that carries damages as high as $100,000, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday...

The ruling is important because DirecTV has sent hundreds of thousands of letters seeking damages from people who have bought devices that can be used to intercept programs, said attorney Jason Schultz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who argued the case. He said the court not only reserved the higher penalties for commercial pirates but also implicitly recognized that only those who actually use the equipment for satellite interception - as opposed to innocent hobbyists and researchers - are subject to any penalties.

[Permalink]

September 10th, 2007

The latest bad idea from the RIAA: "ringle" to combine CD singles, ringtones

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

There's a place where good ideas go to die; unfortunately, the RIAA has just visited the facility and come back with the "ringle," whose name should tell you all you need to know about its chances of success...

Now, none of this ringtone foolishness would even exist if users could more easily create their own ringtones from music they have legally purchased. That's the EFF's position, and the group has just issued a call to arms against the cell phone and music industries for locking down ringtones.

[Permalink]

September 10th, 2007

Rogue FBI Letters Hint at Phone Companies' Own Data Mining Programs

Ryan Singel, Wired News

An FBI office under criminal investigation for sending emergency phone record requests to phone companies that included knowingly false statement also included requests for the phone companies to identify the "community of interest" for the targeted phone numbers, according to documents acquired through a government sunshine lawsuit...

See the original letters in this document (.pdf), acquired by the Electronic Frontier Foundation through a government sunshine request.

[Permalink]

September 8th, 2007

Army insists Web sites follow rules

Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes

Army personnel who monitor online security believe that official service Web sites are doing a good job protecting sensitive information despite a recent report showing nearly 2,000 violations last year...

Documents released last month as part of a lawsuit by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group, showed results of the AWRAC’s review of Army-run Web sites and soldiers’ blog sites between January 2006 and January 2007.

[Permalink]

September 8th, 2007

License plate scanners help recover stolen cars, raise concerns

Associated Press

Officer David Callister was about to drive past the 1991 Nissan sedan when an alert sounded inside his cruiser and an image of a license plate flashed on his laptop. It was a signal that the run-of-the-mill clunker was stolen...

The most frequently cited potential drawback comes from privacy advocates, some of whom worry authorities will use the readers to track the movements of law-abiding people, a risk they said will grow as the devices drop in price and proliferate.

People may drive to abortion clinics, substance-abuse counseling meetings, race tracks or other lawful gatherings but might prefer to keep that private, the advocates said.

"I shouldn't have to take extra precautions to prevent the government from seeing what I am doing every Thursday night," said Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group concerned about privacy rights in the digital age.

[Permalink]

September 8th, 2007

FBI Data Mining Reached Beyond Initial Targets

Eric Lichtblau, New York Times

Based on records released through an EFF FOIA lawsuit against the Justice Department, the New York Times reported that the FBI asked telecommunications companies to turn over information about people in contact with individuals the FBI was investigating, though a degree removed from any suspicious activity and presumably innocent. An an EFF analysis explained, there is no question that this investigative technique is unlawful.

[Permalink]

September 6th, 2007

Federal judge slams government response to FOIA requests on surveillance program

Joshua Pantesco, Jurist

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Office of Legal Counsel, and the office of the Attorney General to submit more information to the court in support of their motion for summary judgment in a consolidated lawsuit seeking the release of documents related to the government's domestic surveillance program...

The court is considering a consolidated lawsuit originating from FOIA requests filed by several privacy advocates, including the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the National Security Archive.

[Permalink]

September 6th, 2007

The world on your desktop

Economist

“EARTH materialises, rotating majestically in front of his face. Hiro reaches out and grabs it. He twists it around so he's looking at Oregon. Tells it to get rid of the clouds, and it does, giving him a crystalline view of the mountains and the seashore.”

That vision from Neal Stephenson's “Snow Crash”, a science-fiction novel published in 1992, aptly describes Google Earth, a computer program that lets users fly over a detailed photographic map of the world...

“When the coverage is everything and everywhere, there is going to be a big problem,” says Lee Tien, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an internet campaign group.

[Permalink]

September 5th, 2007

EFF Looks Back at Four Years of RIAA Lawsuits

Yahoo! Tech

This Saturday marks the fourth anniversary of the RIAA's first lawsuits against consumers, alleging that they were violating copyright by sharing songs on peer-to-peer networks. More than 20,000 (and probably about 30,000) people have been targeted since, and the RIAA shows no signs of slowing down. And yet, P2P networks continue to grow in popularity. Are the lawsuits having any effect?

The EFF takes us on a candid and interesting history lesson [PDF link] in this report, walking us through the RIAA's initial attempts to sue the technology companies out of existence, then, when that failed, to issue "DMCA subpoenas by the thousands," which eventually led to the first wave of settlements: One of the first to settle was a 12-year-old girl living in NYC public housing, forced to publicly apologize for her actions and pay a $2,000 settlement.

[Permalink]

September 5th, 2007

UC Berkeley, Stanford crack down on illegal downloading

Verne Kopytoff, San Francisco Chronicle

College students beware: Universities are ratcheting up punishments for illegally downloading music and video from your dorm rooms this school year in an effort to tamp down the popular pastime...

Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group, said that universities aren't taking a more aggressive stance against file sharing simply to protect students from lawsuits. Congressional committees, encouraged by the entertainment industry, have held hearings about illegal music downloading, which has universities scared that they could lose federal funding, he said.

[Permalink]

September 5th, 2007

House to consider e-voting reform bill

Grant Gross , ComputerWorld

The U.S. House of Representatives is set to vote as early as Thursday on a bill that would require a paper record for electronic voting machines...

The Holt bill faces several obstacles to becoming law, said Matt Zimmerman, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which supports the bill.

"It is not at all clear whether the bill will pass or, even if it does, whether a substantively similar companion bill will then pass the Senate," Zimmerman wrote on the EFF blog. "Like it or not, with election officials arguing that they're running out of time to implement wholesale changes, this likely amounts to Congress' only attempt to make any serious improvements to the nation's election procedures ahead of the 2008 presidential election."

[Permalink]

September 4th, 2007

Feds Tell Secret Spying Court to Keep Opinions Secret

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The Justice Department told a secret spying court Friday that the court lacked the power to even hear the ACLU's request for it to release court opinions about the government's so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program...

While the government said that government sunshine requests were the more appropriate avenue to unseal the records, it also told the court that earlier in August another court ruled the documents were too secret to release, even in part. That ruling came in response to a suit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which had sought the same records via the Freedom of Information Act.

[Permalink]

September 4th, 2007

Consumer groups back patent bill

Grant Gross, InfoWorld

Five consumer groups have given their support to legislation that would overhaul the U.S. patent system, saying the bill would create fairer penalties for infringement.

The Patent Reform Act of 2007 could come before the U.S. House of Representatives for a vote as soon as this week despite objections from some labor unions, small inventors, and some small tech vendors. The bill, backed by several large tech vendors, also found support from Consumer Federation of America, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Knowledge Ecology International, Public Knowledge, and U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

[Permalink]

September 3rd, 2007

Analysis: RIAA wants universities to do its dirty work

Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica

The recording industry has continued to ratchet up its war against peer-to-peer file sharing, and lately it has been working overtime to draft universities into the fight...

A better solution is the one proposed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation in a recent report: instead of transforming college campuses into a miniature surveillance state, record labels and universities could enter into a collective licensing agreement under which the university would pay a flat fee to the record labels in exchange for the right to utilize peer-to-peer applications on campus.

[Permalink]

September 1st, 2007

AT&T Plaintiffs Cite McConnell Remarks

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

Plaintiffs suing AT&T in connection with the government's warrantless surveillance program this week filed a motion asking a federal appeals court in San Francisco to consider as evidence the recent admission by the government's top intelligence official that telecommunications companies aided the program...

"Taken in context, it is clear that [McConnell] is referencing the defendant telecommunications companies in this litigation" as well as dozens of other cases pending in federal court, wrote attorneys for Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action lawsuit last year on behalf of AT&T customers in California who claim that they were wiretapped.

[Permalink]

August 30th, 2007

Inside the Terrorist Screening Center

Dina Temple-Raston, NPR

To visit the Terrorist Screening Center, you have to make some promises. The first is not to divulge where the center is — aside from saying it is in a secure location in Northern Virginia. A reporter has never been allowed inside the center, and NPR was not allowed to record the analysts who work there, in case someone said something that was classified...

In 2004, the year the TSC opened its doors, it had some 5,400 hits. This year, the FBI expects to log more than 22,000.

Those kinds of numbers worry civil liberties advocates like David Sobel, the senior counsel with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"The bottom-line problem is the government since 9-11 has gotten into the business of making lists of suspicious people," he says. "This has happened without much discussion of the criteria or how affected people might get some recourse and get their names off if they mistakenly have been put on such a list."

[Permalink]

August 29th, 2007

Point, Click . . . Eavesdrop: How the FBI Wiretap Net Operates

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The EFF obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act revealing the inner workings of the FBI's Digital Collection System Network (DCSNet), a software suite that allows the Bureau to conduct surveillance on a wide variety of digital devices. The documents have helped researchers analyze the security implications of the system.

[Permalink]

August 29th, 2007

Legal woes mount for TorrentSpy

Greg Sandoval , CNET News.com

Hollywood has pounded TorrentSpy this past week, winning two important court decisions against the BitTorrent search engine that could hand the movie industry some powerful new tools in its fight against illegal file sharing.

But the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a proponent of strong privacy laws on the Web, has criticized the court findings and claim they pose serious threats to Internet users...

Kevin Bankston, an EFF staff attorney, said Cooper misread the law.

"Essentially, one can do ongoing surveillance of another party's e-mails without their consent and not violate the law," Bankston said. "Not only does this open the door to privacy abuses in civil cases but it also could lead to abuses by the government...It's an incredibly dangerous decision."

[Permalink]

August 29th, 2007

EFF report slams RIAA lawsuit campaign, calls for flat-fee, unlimited P2P

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

Four years after the RIAA launched its first lawsuits against individual file-swappers, the Electronic Frontier Foundation takes a look back at the campaign as it has unfolded so far and concludes that "suing music fans is no answer to the P2P dilemma." So what is the answer? According to the EFF's 20-page report on the topic, it's a voluntary collective licensing regime that would let music lovers pay a few bucks a month to legally download (and keep) any songs they want.

[Permalink]

August 29th, 2007

Happy Anniversary Pirates: 20,000 Copyright Lawsuits and Counting

David Kravets, Wired News

Four years ago, the recording industry set off a legal firestorm when it sued 261 music file-swappers, a move that has reshaped the peer-to-peer, file-sharing world and revamped pirating technologies.

The legal tempest commenced September 8, 2003. Members of the Recording Industry Association of America have followed with some 20,000 similar lawsuits, legal threats and settlements, according to a report published Wednesday by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"The lawsuits, however, are not working," according to the report by the California privacy group. "Today, downloading from P2P networks is more popular than ever, despite the widespread public awareness of lawsuits."

[Permalink]

August 28th, 2007

TorrentSpy shuts doors to America

Cade Metz, Register UK

Unwilling to compromise the privacy of its users, TorrentSpy has shut its doors to American file sharers. The move came just hours before a U.S. judge denied an appeal from the company, insisting - once again - that it turn over server logs detailing user behavior...

TorrentSpy's server logs pass through system memory, but are never permanently recorded. The company argues that saving this data would violate its privacy policy, and when Judge Chooljian's order went public, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a big-name privacy watchdog, launched a defense of its own. "We think it's a very troubling ruling that goes well beyond TorrentSpy," EFF lawyer Fred von Lohmann told The Reg. "It potentially allows any company's privacy policy to be re-written by its adversary's lawyers. It's a bad precedent to set."

[Permalink]

August 28th, 2007

FBI's Wiretap Network Revealed And Request for Reader Document Analysis

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The FBI has quietly built a sophisticated, point-and-click surveillance system that performs instant wiretaps on almost any communications device, according to nearly a thousand pages of restricted documents newly released under the Freedom of Information Act and provided to Wired News by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

August 27th, 2007

TorrentSpy to MPAA: Log this! Site blocks US searches

Jacqui Cheng, Ars Technica

US users of the popular Torrent search site TorrentSpy can use the site no more—at least not for now. TorrentSpy has begun to block all searches by US visitors, instead redirecting search requests to a page with the headline "TorrentSpy Acts to Protect Privacy"...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy and Technology both warned that such a decision imposed massive record-keeping burdens on practically any company that uses computers. Not only that, but Internet privacy would essentially be dead if companies were forced to hand over such information to the MPAA, RIAA, or anyone else for that matter. "A court would never think to force a company to record telephone calls, transcribe employee conversations, or log other ephemeral information," EFF attorney Fred von Lohmann said. "There is no reason why the rules should be different simply because a company uses digital technologies."

[Permalink]

August 26th, 2007

DVD Dilemma

Vince Vitrano, TMJ (NBC - Milwaukee)

New technology allows you to download your favorite shows... and even copy your movies. The big question: if you use it, are you breaking the law?...

Fred von Lohmann, with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the law doesn't make sense. "There is a sense here which it prevents consumers from doing things they otherwise would be entitled to do legally."

[Permalink]

August 25th, 2007

U.S. terror database under rights scrutiny

UPI

U.S. rights groups are questioning the validity of a growing federal list of terror suspects that contains at least 235,000 names...

"This really confirms the long-standing fear that this list is inaccurate and ultimately ineffective as an anti-terrorism tool," David Sobel, senior counsel with the Electronic Frontier Foundation advocacy group told the Post.

He said the numbers "suggest a staggeringly high rate of false positives with respect to the identification of supposed terrorists."

[Permalink]

August 24th, 2007

Lawyer: Spy boss undercuts security case by confirming AT&T role

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle

A newspaper interview by the nation's spymaster, confirming that telecommunications companies have helped the Bush administration's clandestine surveillance program, has undermined the government's attempt to shield AT&T for its role in the effort, a lawyer for customers of the company said Thursday...

Kurt Opsahl, one of the privacy-rights lawyers representing AT&T customers in San Francisco, said Thursday that McConnell's newspaper comments contradicted the administration's legal position.

"The government has taken such an extreme position that this information is secret, a substantive part of thir argument that these cases must be dismissed," said Opsahl, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "The director of national intelligence candidly confirmed what had been previously asserted to be secret."

[Permalink]

August 22nd, 2007

Spy Chief Torpedos Government's Lawyering in Spy Cases

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell contradicted the government and his own legal defenses of the nations' telecoms by telling an El Paso newspaper that the companies helped the government with its warrantless wiretapping program. That program ran from October 2001 to January 2006 without court supervision, but now gets special program warrants from a secret spy court...

Just last week, Justice Department lawyers tried to convince the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out the Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit against AT&T because confirming or denying an NSA-AT&T relationship would compromise national security...

EFF lawyer Kurt Opsahl tells THREAT LEVEL that it comes as no surprise that the telcoms worked with the NSA given the evidence in the cases.

"What is interesting is the contrast between McConnell saying this in public and what the government says is a state secret in its court filings," Opsahl said. "It is difficult to read what he is saying as anything other than that the very telcos who are currently being sued are the ones that cooperated with the program."

[Permalink]

August 22nd, 2007

1998 newsgroup posts could help EFF overturn broad patent on "virtual subdomains"

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Patent Busting Project takes aim at another patent as the EFF and lawyer Rick Mc Leod have joined forces to request a USPTO re-examination (PDF) of an Ideaflood patent on "virtual subdomains." According to the request, the patent in question describes capabilities that had already been implemented in Apache when the patent was filed

[Permalink]

August 21st, 2007

Report: Official Army Web sites sacrificing security

By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes

Army researchers found security violations on official service Web portals at nearly 40 times the rate of soldiers’ blogs, according to documents from a digital watchdog group released last week.

The data from the Electronic Frontier Foundation was part of the Army’s answer to a lawsuit requesting information about the Army’s tracking and troubleshooting of soldier’s personal sites...

“This shows that bloggers seem to be doing a good job keeping sensitive material off their sites,” said Marcia Hofmann, EFF attorney and spokeswoman. “It appears that where they should be focusing more attention is on their own sites.”

[Permalink]

August 19th, 2007

State looks at limiting scanning technology

Michael Gardner, Sign On San Diego

With little thought, many Californians carry wafer-thin cards containing a 15-cent silicon chip that enable them to zip through toll booths, enter parking garages and access the office...

Critics say RFID data can be obtained by lifting the identifying number literally out of someone's pocket with a remote scanner from a couple of feet away. Data bases could be accessed to match the number with other personal information. In one experiment, access cards of several legislative employees were remotely read in elevators and in hallways and cloned, providing the “thief” with access to private, secured areas.

“It sounds like science fiction, but it's quite doable,” said Lee Tien, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocate for privacy rights in the digital world. “It's not paranoia if the threat is real.”

[Permalink]

August 18th, 2007

Report: Brass, Not Blogs, Have Loose Lips

Robert Weller, Associated Press

An Army investigative report found that official Army Web sites violated operational security more than military bloggers...

The report was obtained by the Washington, D.C.-based Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), under orders from a federal district court.

The Army tightened rules on blogging by soldiers in May, requiring that they be cleared by commanders, partly because of concerns the bloggers might reveal information that would help insurgents.

[Permalink]

August 17th, 2007

Army Reports Brass, Not Bloggers, Breach Security

Noah Shachtman, Wired News

According to documents released through an EFF lawsuit against the Army and Defense Department, soldier journalists post far less information that could harm military operations than official .mil websites do. These documents called into question the need for new restrictions on soldiers' online speech, which some critics fear will cause military bloggers to cut back on their posts or shut down their sites altogether.

[Permalink]

August 17th, 2007

Debate heats up on what's protected by copyright laws

Joe Garofoli, San Francisco Chronicle

The new documentary "War Made Easy" isn't just a searing critique of how administrations over the past 40 years have manipulated the media to build support for war. The 72-minute film is a media provocation itself -- a challenge to federal copyright laws...

After seeing how debate clips turned up on YouTube and blogs -- and were mashed up into parodies -- "the networks realized that you can either work with people or you can fight them," said Jason Schultz, an attorney specializing in intellectual property law in the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco.

"This also shows the power of popular marketing on the Internet. How word-of-mouth spread online is being recognized as a legitimate marketing tool," Schultz said.

[Permalink]

August 17th, 2007

Army Reports Brass, Not Bloggers, Breach Security

Noah Shachtman, Wired News

The new documentary "War Made Easy" isn't just a searing critique of how administrations over the past 40 years have manipulated the media to build support for war. The 72-minute film is a media provocation itself -- a challenge to federal copyright laws...

The results were obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, after the digital rights group filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act.

"It's clear that official Army websites are the real security problem, not blogs," said EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann. "Bloggers, on the whole, have been very careful and conscientious. It's a pretty major disparity."

[Permalink]

August 16th, 2007

Judges Skeptical of State-Secrets Claim

Karl Vick, Washington Post

Lawyers for the Bush administration encountered a federal appeals court Wednesday that appeared deeply skeptical of a blanket claim that the government's surveillance efforts cannot be challenged in court because the litigation might reveal state secrets...

One suit, Hepting v. AT&T, is a class action that grew out of allegations by retired AT&T engineer Mark Klein that the company had cooperated with the National Security Agency to install equipment that funneled Internet traffic to the surveillance agency. A "secret room" described in court filings by Klein was located in an office building on Folsom Street, seven blocks from the courthouse.

[Permalink]

August 16th, 2007

U.S. Defends Surveillance to 3 Skeptical Judges

Adam Liptak, New York Times

Three federal appeals court judges hearing challenges to the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs appeared skeptical of and sometimes hostile to the Bush administration’s central argument Wednesday: that national security concerns require that the lawsuits be dismissed...

In the AT&T case, the plaintiffs submitted a sworn statement from a former technician for the company who disclosed technical documents about the installation of monitoring equipment at an AT&T Internet switching center in San Francisco.

Mr. Garre, representing the administration, and Michael K. Kellogg, a lawyer for AT&T, said the sworn statement was built on speculation and inferences. Robert D. Fram, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the statement provided more than enough direct evidence to allow the case to go forward.

[Permalink]

August 16th, 2007

Classified evidence debated

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle

A federal appeals court holding a high-stakes hearing Wednesday in San Francisco on President Bush's clandestine eavesdropping program appeared inclined to keep alive a lawsuit accusing AT&T of illegally letting the government intercept millions of Americans' phone calls and e-mails...

The AT&T suit, like several cases pending against other telecommunications companies, accuses the firm of giving the National Security Agency unlimited access to customers' phone calls, e-mails and message records. Plaintiffs in the AT&T case have submitted a declaration by a former company engineer who said he helped install equipment at the company's San Francisco office that would divert Internet messages to a room reserved for government-cleared employees.

[Permalink]

August 16th, 2007

Phone customers, charity challenge U.S. wiretapping

Henry Weinstein, Los Angeles Times

Justice Department attorneys attempted to persuade three federal appellate court judges Wednesday to dismiss two major lawsuits challenging the Bush administration's warrantless domestic-eavesdropping program...

Plaintiffs' attorney Robert Fram said his clients have powerful evidence that AT&T worked on a huge surveillance program.

Fram, a lawyer working with attorneys from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, cited a sworn declaration by former AT&T employee Mark Klein, describing a supersecure room in a building in San Francisco where AT&T assembled high-powered dating-mining equipment for a "special job" for the NSA. He said he had heard from other employees that similar operations were being put together in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose and Seattle.

[Permalink]

August 16th, 2007

Federal ID plan raises privacy concerns

Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN

Americans may need passports to board domestic flights or to picnic in a national park next year if they live in one of the states defying the federal Real ID Act...

Colorado and New Hampshire lawmakers are not alone. Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation say the IDs and supporting databases -- which Chertoff said would eventually be federally interconnected -- will infringe on privacy.

EFF says on its Web site that the information in the databases will lay the groundwork for "a wide range of surveillance activities" by government and businesses that "will be able to easily read your private information" because of the bar code required on each card.

[Permalink]

August 15th, 2007

Nation's Soul Is at Stake in NSA Surveillance Case

Jennifer Granick, Wired News

Today the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco is hearing arguments on two of the most important cases in decades dealing with the rule of law and personal privacy.
The cases are Hepting v. AT&T and Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. Bush. At stake is whether the government can immunize itself from public oversight and prosecution for illegal activities by claiming that whatever actions it took were done in the name of national security. These cases will also influence whether the government is entitled to warehouse citizen phone calls and e-mails for subsequent unsupervised searching and data mining.

[Permalink]

August 15th, 2007

Major copyright case to test First Sale Doctrine, possibly shrinkwrap EULAs

Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has taken up the case of a California man who has been sued by Universal Music Group for selling promotional CDs...

In addition to responding to UMG's charges, EFF has countersued UMG for sending "takedown" letters to eBay claiming that Augustino's CDs infringed copyright. In a post on EFF's blog, von Lohmann charges that UMG has been "harassing a number of promo CD merchants, sending bogus DMCA takedown notices to eBay, getting auctions suspended, and accounts terminated." Victory in the case would make it easier for other eBay sellers to resist UMG's efforts to shut them down.

[Permalink]

August 15th, 2007

Appeals court may let NSA lawsuits proceed

Declan McCullagh , CNET News.com

A federal appeals court on Wednesday appeared unwilling to end a pair of lawsuits that claim the Bush administration engaged in widespread illegal surveillance of Americans...

n the first case, called Hepting v. AT&T, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other attorneys had filed a class action lawsuit against AT&T saying it unlawfully opened its networks to the NSA. Last summer, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco ruled that it could proceed.

[Permalink]

August 15th, 2007

Feds urge appeals court to dismiss eavesdropping lawsuits

Paul Elias, Associated Press

Government lawyers, citing national security risks, urged an appeals court Wednesday to toss out two legal challenges to a Bush administration anti-terror program that allowed government spies to eavesdrop on Americans without warrants...

Robert Fram, who represents the AT&T customers, said the best evidence that his clients' communications were intercepted comes from a former AT&T engineer who spoke to the media. The engineer said the company installed a special room with highly limited access at its San Francisco offices that contained equipment designed specifically for surveillance.

[Permalink]

August 15th, 2007

Domestic Spying Programs Under Fire In Court

Mark Matthews, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in two lawsuits brought by groups who believe they've been subjects of the government's eavesdropping.

One group, led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is suing AT&T for allegedly funneling phone lines wholesale into computers, and then turning the information over to the government.

[Permalink]

August 14th, 2007

Lawsuits May Illuminate Methods of Spy Program

Dan Eggen, Washington Post

In 2003, Room 641A of a large telecommunications building in downtown San Francisco was filled with powerful data-mining equipment for a "special job" by the National Security Agency, according to a former AT&T technician...

"If the courts take the position that the state-secrets privilege prevents the case from going forward, I think effectively there'll never be a decision about the legality of the program," said Cindy Cohn, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's legal director. "I think it's tremendously important for that."

[Permalink]

August 13th, 2007

E-ZPass to Divorce

Good Morning America, ABC News

EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien is featured in the video.

[Permalink]

August 10th, 2007

AT&T Tells Court That Secret Wiretapping Destroys Privacy (in 1927)

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The first time the Supreme Court heard a case about whether the government had the right to spy on Americans conversations without a warrant, AT&T filed a brief with the court arguing that such spying was inimical to democracy. That document was blogged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation which is now suing the nation's largest telecom for its alleged participation in warrantless dragnet spying and data-mining of Amercians' phone calls and internet use.

[Permalink]

August 10th, 2007

Video Site Veoh Sues To Stop Universal

Richard Koman , Top Tech News

Faced with saber-rattling by Universal Music Group (UMG), online video sharing network Veoh has requested a federal judge to rule that its business is protected by the Safe Harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...

If the courts decide against Veoh or Google and its YouTube property, the legal landscape for such Web 2.0 sites could be substantially altered. "Google has basically been following the advice of the best lawyers in Silicon Valley," Electronic Frontier Foundation's Fred Von Lohmann said at the time Viacom filed its case. "If Viacom wins, that would call into doubt all of the business models that relied on the same kinds of legal advice."

[Permalink]

August 10th, 2007

AT&T Wiretapping Case Headed for Hearing

Stephen Lawson, PC World

A federal appeals court will hear arguments next Wednesday on whether to stop a class-action privacy suit that is based on allegations that the government and AT&T Inc. have been working together in an illegal wiretapping program.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) brought the case in a U.S. District Court in San Francisco last year on behalf of Tash Hepting and other AT&T customers. The suit alleges AT&T cooperated with the National Security Agency to conduct surveillance of millions of customers' communications illegally, violating the customers' privacy.

[Permalink]

August 9th, 2007

Wiretapping Bill Puts Telcos on Hold

Massimo Calabresi, TIME

By most appearances, President Bush scored a rare and much sought-after victory last weekend...

The question will surface in coming weeks as lawyers for the government, the telecommunications companies and activist organizations face off in a California court. Next Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments as the government seeks to dismiss a case brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others claiming AT&T illegally intercepted and provided to the government calls and e-mails of Americans.

[Permalink]

August 3rd, 2007

Can Anyone Police File Sharing?

Andy Guess, Inside Higher Ed

Campus file sharing briefly hit prominence in Congress last week as colleges lobbied against a proposed amendment in the Senate to the Higher Education Act reauthorization that would have required universities to use “technology-based” systems to try to block illegal downloading activity. While the amendment was withdrawn, it may be revived in the House — and certainly the entertainment industry has no intention of letting the issue go away...

“The response has not been to dampen students’ enthusiasm for downloading music,” said Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group that is critical of lawsuits targeting online music downloaders.

[Permalink]

August 3rd, 2007

Bush, Dems Deadlock Over Surveillance Program

Mark Matthews, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

Summer vacations are on hold in Washington. Lawmakers are planning for a weekend of work, trying to hammer out an agreement with the White House over the terrorist surveillance program...

Cindy Cohn, EFF Legal Director: "This was really a big rush by the administration at the last minute and there are a lot of members of Congress who I think are frankly uncomfortable with voting in the dark like this."

[Permalink]

August 2nd, 2007

Out of the Theater, Into the Courtroom

Daniela Deane, Washington Post

Jhannet Sejas and her boyfriend were celebrating her 19th birthday by taking in a matinee showing of the hit movie "Transformers" at the theater at Ballston Common mall...

"The movie industry needs to recognize that their audience isn't the enemy," said Cindy Cohn, general counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit group that specializes in digital rights issues. "They need to stop treating their fans like criminals. . . . What they're doing is extremely unreasonable, coming down on this poor girl who was actually trying to promote their movie."

[Permalink]

August 2nd, 2007

Mining MySpace

Andy Greenberg, Forbes.com

Most Web users will admit to having used MySpace or Facebook to spy on their teenage kids or an ex-significant other. But Stephen Patton has made social network snooping into a science...

The lesson for social networkers is to filter their MySpace postings before they hit the Web, says Kevin Bankston, a privacy attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "These kinds of tools emphasize that when users post information to Web sites, it can be collected by law enforcement or anyone else who cares," Bankston says. "You shouldn't have any illusions about the fact that you're publishing to the world."

[Permalink]

August 2nd, 2007

Support for Attorney General Gonzales slips further

Peter Grier, Christian Science Monitor

Seldom have a cabinet official and a Congress been so at odds. After months of bickering over fired US attorneys, congressional subpoenas, and secret eavesdropping, embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales now has few supporters left on Capitol Hill, even among his fellow Republicans...

"The administration has finally copped to a broader [surveillance] program," wrote Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), in a July 31 analysis of recent developments in the case.

[Permalink]

July 30th, 2007

"Attempted infringement" appears in new House intellectual property bill

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

Back in May, the Justice Department issued some proposed legislation to tighten US intellectual property laws and to criminalize some forms of "attempted infringement." Now, legislation based on the proposals has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH), complete with stiffer jail terms for violators and the controversial "attempted infringement" clause...

The bill is full of the sort of things that groups like the EFF aren't going to like, and in fact the EFF has already issued a statement condemning the legislation. One of their concerns is that a small change to the law could have big effects on casual file-sharers for a different reason: P2P users could face greater penalties for infringement after statutory damages are expanded.

The bill allows "a judge to dole out damages for each separate piece of a derivative work or compilation, rather than treating it as one work," wrote Derek Slater, "for example, copying an entire album could translate into damages for each individual track, even if the copyrights in those tracks aren't separately registered."

[Permalink]

July 30th, 2007

New bill backs prison time for piracy 'attempts'

Anne Broache, CNET News.com

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales may not have a lot of pals in Congress these days, but he has nevertheless found someone willing to pursue the dramatic copyright crackdown lurking on his legislative wishlist...

Digital rights activists are already bristling at the new language, which currently has no co-sponsors. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, for instance, has argued that the bill and similar past efforts would lead to more convictions of innocent people. In a recent blog post, EFF activism coordinator said he hopes the Chabot proposal "meets the same fate as last year's DoJ proposal and is stopped dead in its tracks."

[Permalink]

July 28th, 2007

Bush Asks Congress To Expand Surveillance

CBS News

In the midst of a festering public scandal surrounding the administration's secret wiretapping program and the attorney general's efforts to have it extended, President George W. Bush is calling on Congress to expand the law governing the issuance of warrants to intelligence agencies for surveillance...

This could affect a lawsuit before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in which the Electronic Frontier Foundation is suing AT&T for violating the rights of its customers by assisting the NSA with spying. The government has sought to have the suit dismissed on the grounds that state secrets would be exposed in a trial.

[Permalink]

July 28th, 2007

Audio: Uneasy Ties Bind Music Companies, Music Blogs

Joel Rose, NPR

Record labels usually frown on fans sharing music for free online, but tolerate MP3, or music, blogs. These fan-run sites have proven effective in breaking unknown indie bands. But it's a relationship that is still rocky at times, as Joel Rose of member station WHYY reports.

(Featuring EFF Senior Intellectual Property Attorney Fred von Lohmann.)

[Permalink]

July 27th, 2007

Your Help Needed in Analyzing FBI Docs

Lisa Vaas, eWeek

Lacking something to read at the beach this summer? Problem solved: There are 1,138 pages detailing FBI activity that need to be pored over by good citizens so as to ferret out abuse of power.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has requested that people "dive into the docs," all of which are freely downloadable, with searchable text, from the nonprofit group's Web site.

[Permalink]

July 26th, 2007

Judge won't dismiss states' wiretap suits

Paul Elias, Associated Press

A federal judge declined to dismiss lawsuits filed by Connecticut, Maine, Vermont, and two other states seeking information on a warrantless wiretap program run by the federal government. The decision keeps the cases alive, pending an appeals court decision...

Cindy Cohn, chief lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil rights group that will argue the case against the government in the appeals court, said yesterday's ruling was "significant because the government wanted to kill these cases and the judge refused."

[Permalink]

July 25th, 2007

YouTube User Puts Legal Lash to Universal

Nicholas Carlson , InternetNews

Now it's the copyright holders getting taken to court.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed suit today against Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG), asking a federal court to protect the fair use and free speech rights of a mother who posted a short video of her toddler son on the Internet.

[Permalink]

July 25th, 2007

Senators to abandon '08 e-voting paper trail mandate

Anne Broache, CNET News.com

Democratic senators on Wednesday made another push for banning electronic voting machines that lack paper trails, but they've backed away from doing so in time for next year's presidential election...

In some ways, the Senate effort resembles a bill approved by a House of Representatives panel in May. Election officials have criticized that bill as setting forth unrealistic requirements, insufficient funding and impossible timetables--including implementation, with some exceptions, by next year's elections. But advocacy groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, say it is an important step toward creating more open, transparent elections.

[Permalink]

July 25th, 2007

Universal demands takedown of homemade dancing toddler clip; EFF sues

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

A 29-second video clip of a toddler dancing to Prince's "Let's Go Crazy" is the subject of a new court complaint against Universal Music Publishing Group, which demanded that the clip be removed from YouTube in early June. Apparently, the company believes that a few seconds of music blasting from a background stereo infringes on its copyright, but the Electronic Frontier Foundation disagrees. The EFF filed suit against Universal yesterday, alleging that the music in the clip was "self-evident non-infringing fair use."

[Permalink]

July 25th, 2007

EFF Takes Universal To Court Over DMCA Issues

Terrence Russell, Wired News

Not since that annoying Ally McBeal baby has a dancing toddler caused so much commotion. All it took was Stephanie Lenz uploading a 29 second clip of her son rocking out to Prince's "Let's Go Crazy" on YouTube and now Universal Music Publishing Group is up in arms. The worst of it came last month as YouTube removed the clip in compliance with their own DMCA policy after Universal's official request.

Now the Electronic Frontier Foundation has announced that they are filing suit against the music giant with the intent to "protect the fair use and free speech rights of a mother who posted a short video of her toddler son dancing to a Prince song on the Internet."

[Permalink]

July 24th, 2007

EULA: What Are You Signing Away?

Andrew K. Burger, E-Commerce Times

Software developers and vendors have used standard contracts to protect themselves, their products and services, and to set the terms of agreements with customers. However, in doing so they often set legally binding terms and conditions that consumer advocacy groups would argue overstep the bounds of what should be expected or permissible...

EULAs have been used "to require users to sign away their fair use rights, such as the right to reverse engineer," Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) staff attorney Corynne McSherry told the E-Commerce Times. "Essentially, companies are using contract law to trump basic IP (Internet protocol) protections for users -- often without users' knowledge."

[Permalink]

July 10th, 2007

Gonzales Was Told of FBI Violations

John Solomon, Washington Post

As he sought to renew the USA Patriot Act two years ago, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales assured lawmakers that the FBI had not abused its potent new terrorism-fighting powers. "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse," Gonzales told senators on April 27, 2005...

Marcia Hofmann, a lawyer for the nonpartisan Electronic Frontier Foundation, said, "I think these documents raise some very serious questions about how much the attorney general knew about the FBI's misuse of surveillance powers and when he knew it." A lawsuit by Hofmann's group seeking internal FBI documents about NSLs prompted the release of the reports.

[Permalink]

July 10th, 2007

Gonzales Was Told of FBI Violations

John Solomon, Washington Post

On April 27, 2005, Attorney General Gonzales assured Congress that "there has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse" as a result o the PATRIOT Act. An EFF lawsuit against the Department Of Justice revealed that just six days before he made this statment to Congress, Gonzales had been copied on a communication to a presidential oversight board reporting improper use of a National Security Letter by the FBI. This incident helped to prompt an internal Justice Department investigation into whether Gonzales has made false or misleading testimony before Congress.

[Permalink]

July 7th, 2007

Spoon-altering psychic has copyright advocates bent out of shape

Paul Elias, Associated Press

Uri Geller became a 1970s superstar and made millions with an act that included bending spoons, seemingly through the power of his own mind...

"All it takes is a single e-mail to completely censor someone on the Internet," said Jason Schultz, a lawyer for the online civil rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is suing Geller over an unflattering clip posted on YouTube for which he claimed a copyright ownership.

[Permalink]

July 5th, 2007

Imagine There's No DRM... I Wonder if You Can

Tekla S. Perry, IEEE Spectrum

Digital rights management, the group of technologies that control copying and use of digital media downloads and disks, has infuriated consumers since its inception in the mid-1990s...

If the industry moves in the direction of lifting DRM and “we end up in a world in which music is sold in an unrestricted format as a default, we have the world we want to live in,” says Jason Schultz, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a consumer advocacy organization.

[Permalink]

July 3rd, 2007

Hollywood hates pirates, but can it use them?

Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com

Attorney Nancy Prager sees only thievery in file sharing. Don't even try to suggest anything otherwise to her...

"File sharing has been going on for years now and yet the movie industry continues to see record profits and revenues," said Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group for Internet users. "Clearly file sharing is not killing the movie industry, far from it."

[Permalink]

July 3rd, 2007

More Evil Than Google?

Andy Greenberg, Forbes.com

No matter how many times Google chants its "Don't be evil" mantra, its critics just won't disappear...

So is it fair to hold a double standard for Google and other search companies? Kurt Opsahl of the Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that it is: Because of the company's unprecedented dominance of the search industry and its massive data collection, he says that a little evil from Google goes a long way.

"Google gets the most press because it's the biggest, and that's fair," Opsahl says. "Every decision they make has so much impact."

[Permalink]

June 29th, 2007

File-sharing 'graveyard' still filling up

Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com

To some, these were corporate executions, death by litigation. LokiTorrent, Scour, SuperNova.org, Aimster and the original Napster were just a few of those sued out of existence, the victims of the entertainment industry's fear of technology, say the companies' supporters.

"The Internet's graveyard is deep with companies that have been sued out of business by the entertainment industry," said Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which advocates for the rights of Internet users. "I think the prevailing sense is that they are winning the battles but losing the war. Despite the lawsuits, there is more file sharing than ever."

[Permalink]

June 29th, 2007

WIPO broadcast treaty defeated by web activists

OUT-LAW News

A controversial new intellectual property right due to be created by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has been successfully opposed by a coalition of web activists and the technology industry...

Gwen Hinze is the international affairs director for the EFF. She told weekly technology law podcast OUT-LAW Radio about the opposition to the plans.

"If you create a new layer of rights that sit on top of copyright from a consumer's point of view that raises questions about access to information, so information that might otherwise be in the public domain as a matter of copyright law, the exceptions and limitations wouldn't apply and that raises some concerns about access to knowledge," said Hinze.

[Permalink]

June 28th, 2007

Sunday begins a new era for cable subscribers

David Lieberman, USA TODAY

The summer's just started, yet cable operators are already drenched in sweat.

They are bracing for a deadline they staved off for more than a decade — one that could bring a wave of new TV viewing options for many of the 65.6 million homes connected to cable...

What's more, media activists including the Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation told the FCC this month that having CableLabs approve equipment "limits competition and locks out flexible and innovative features from consumers."

[Permalink]

June 26th, 2007

Google seeks help

Associated Press

Once relatively indifferent to government affairs, Google Inc. is seeking help inside the Beltway to fight the rise of Web censorship worldwide...

Governments "are having more success than the more idealistic of us thought," acknowledges Danny O'Brien, international outreach coordinator at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

June 25th, 2007

EFF and CDT: Torrentspy decision could spell end of Internet privacy

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

Could one judge's decision in a copyright case broadly rewrite US laws governing legal discovery? The EFF and the Center for Democracy & Technology are both warning that a recent legal decision could eliminate privacy on the Internet and impose massive record-keeping burdens on any company that uses computers.

[Permalink]

June 25th, 2007

Just An Online Minute... The Suit That Might KO Online Privacy

Wendy Davis, MediaPost

Some civil rights advocates are worried that a pending copyright lawsuit brought by major entertainment studios against operators of the peer-to-peer site www.torrentspy.com could eviscerate online privacy.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has now stepped into the case, arguing that if the studios get their way, people will no longer be able to browse the Web in relative anonymity.

[Permalink]

June 22nd, 2007

DOJ asks federal court to block state probes of NSA domestic spying

Michael Sung, Jurist

he US Department of Justice (DOJ) asked a federal district judge Thursday to block New Jersey, Vermont, Maine, Missouri, and Connecticut from investigating potential violations of state consumer privacy laws in the controversial warrantless domestic surveillance program, arguing that the state secrets privilege doctrine bars the state governments from subpoenaing ten telecommunication companies to determine what information they passed onto the National Security Agency (NSA)...

Walker is also currently presiding over a class action lawsuit challenging the legality of the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) brought the class action against AT&T in January 2006, alleging that the company had unlawfully provided the NSA with access to its facilities and resources to unconstitutionally spy on "millions of ordinary Americans."

[Permalink]

June 20th, 2007

What's in a Laptop? Court Ponders Legality of Border Searches

Ryan Singel, Wired news

Is your laptop a fancy piece of luggage or an extension of your mind? That's the central question facing a federal appeals court in a case that could sharply limit the government's ability to snoop into laptop computers carried across the border by American citizens...

Lahue has support from the Association of Corporate Travel Executives and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The two groups submitted a friend-of-the-court brief Tuesday arguing that suspicionless searches of laptops are overly invasive, and that prior to the California ruling, the government had no limits on what it could do when it seizes a laptop and makes a copy of the hard drive.

[Permalink]

June 20th, 2007

Debate Over Laptop Seizures Heats Up

K.C. Jones, InformationWeek

The question as to whether border agents and investigators have the right to snoop through travelers' laptops as they enter the United States is stirring up even more controversy...

The Association of Corporate Travel Executives disagrees. It filed an amicus brief in the case this week.

"Over the past several years, U.S. customs agents have been searching and even seizing travelers' laptops when they are entering or leaving the country if the traveler fits a profile, appears on a government watch list, or is chosen for a random inspection," the group said in a joint statement with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "The Supreme Court has ruled that customs and border agents may perform routine searches at the border without a warrant or even reasonable suspicion, but EFF and ACTE argue that inspections of computers are far more invasive than flipping through a briefcase."

[Permalink]

June 20th, 2007

EFF sides with TorrentSpy in MPAA lawsuit

Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com

As expected, the Electronic Frontier Foundation plans to file a friends-of-the-court brief in support of TorrentSpy, the search engine accused of copyright violations...

Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney with EFF, which advocates for the rights of Internet users, said the group has notified representatives from TorrentSpy and the motion picture studios of their intent to file an amicus brief that argues for a reversal of the judge's decision.

He added that EFF is also looking for others to join them on the brief.

"This is the first time the court has found that information found only in RAM is subject to preservation," von Lohmann said. "Companies may be obliged to begin logging and producing information about conversations that occur on digital phones, which are stored on RAM. Nobody is asked to preserve records for analog phone conversations."

[Permalink]

June 19th, 2007

EFF wins 4th Amendment email victory

Richi Jennings, ComputerWorld

The "wow" starts with Wednesday's IT Blogwatch: in which the Electronic Frontier Foundation wins against warrentless U.S. email snooping.

[Permalink]

June 19th, 2007

King for A Never-Ending War

Wired news

We are kings. You can't touch us.

That's the essence the government's most recent reply brief in the Electronic Frontier Foundation lawsuit against AT&T for its alleged complicity in helping the NSA wiretap sans warrant the emails and phone calls of Americans.

[Permalink]

June 15th, 2007

Want Off Street View? Google Wants Your ID and a Sworn Statement

Kevin Poulsen, Wired news

EFF privacy advocate and unhappy Street View model Kevin Bankston made good on his vow to try out Google's take-down policy after THREAT LEVEL found a picture of his unwitting mug stalking the sidewalks near EFF's offices. What he learned: Google is happy to remove you from Street View ... provided you give them a wealth of additional information, including a photo of your driver's license.

[Permalink]

June 13th, 2007

Audio: Google's Street View captures image of privacy critic

Jon Gordon, NPR: Future Tense

The new Street View feature of Google Maps provides 360 degree panoramic street-level views of New York City, San Francisco, Miami, Denver, and Las Vegas...

Kevin Bankston, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, has emerged as a top critic of Street View. It turns out that Street View captured Bankston walking to work while smoking a cigarette. What's more, this isn't the first time the privacy crusader has been captured by street-mapping cameras.

[Permalink]

June 13th, 2007

Google's Street View Upsets Privacy Advocates

JOSH GERSTEIN, New York Sun

Google's new Street View service, which allows users to pull up street-level, 360-degree photos of addresses in major urban areas, is cool and more than a little creepy, but is it legal?...

Legal experts say there is no hard-and-fast legal rule that blesses all public photography. "Privacy laws vary from state to state, but there have been instances where legal liability was found even for photos taken in public," an attorney urging changes to Street View, Kevin Bankston of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said.

[Permalink]

June 13th, 2007

EFF lawyer is smokin' on Google Street View

Dan Goodin, Register

Google's Street View service is barely two weeks old and it's already attracted plenty of criticism from privacy advocates...

Now we've found yet another compelling reason to knit our brows, this time provided by Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. By comparison his adventure with Street View is mild. An eagle-eyed reporter for Wired News spotted him in San Francisco's Mission District drawing on a cigarette as he walked to work. It was ironic, because Bankston, a critic of these types of things, was captured smoking on Amazon.com's now defunct A9 service a few years ago.

[Permalink]

June 12th, 2007

Google Maps: An Invasion of Privacy?

S. JAMES SNYDER, Time

Is that man breaking into an apartment building? Does that tollbooth operator realize she's being photographed? And isn't it illegal to have cameras in New York's Brooklyn Battery tunnel?...

"There is a serious tension here, between the concepts of free speech, and open information, and the idea of privacy," says Kevin Bankston, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation." There's definitely a privacy concern that an unmarked Google camera van can, and in fact has, captured images of people, whether in the street or in their homes, in a manner that could be embarrassing or even dangerous to them." He adds: "We don't think what Google's done here is necessarily illegal, though a few images may cross the line and may create liability. It's more that they've done something that's really irresponsible and rude to people."

[Permalink]

June 11th, 2007

MPAA accuses TorrentSpy of concealing evidence

Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com

The movie studios may have discovered a new and powerful weapon in their war on copyright infringement...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the judge's decision "troubling" and said it could mean that any Web site operator could be compelled to log user activity anytime they faced a lawsuit.

[Permalink]

June 11th, 2007

EFF Privacy Advocate Sighted in Google Street View

Kevin Poulsen, Wired news

It's official. Every new street level map view service has to capture an image of EFF staff attorney Kevin Bankston sneaking a cigarette.

Amazon's now-defunct A9 service first nailed Bankston outside EFF's San Francisco office a few years ago. He'd been trying conceal his smoking from his family.

[Permalink]

June 11th, 2007

Video: "Street View:" Inventive Or Invasive?

CBS Evening News

Google photographed the streets of five cities — New York, San Francisco, Denver, Miami and Las Vegas — with a special 360-degree camera mounted on a van.

The snapshots range from amazingly detailed to boringly mundane. It's a great tool for tourists or home-sick transplants, but privacy advocate Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said Google is being too invasive.

[Permalink]

June 11th, 2007

Consumer groups back cable company in networked DVR spat

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

The EFF, Public Knowledge, and the Center for Democracy & Technology don't often find themselves arguing on behalf of of large cable companies, but the three groups recently joined forces to defend Cablevision's networked DVR.

[Permalink]

June 8th, 2007

Some say spyware bill too broad, others say too weak

Grant Gross, InfoWorld

An antispyware bill that passed the U.S. House of Representatives this week faces opposition from several groups with one side saying it's too strong and the other saying it's too weak...

Meanwhile, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has raised different objections to the SPY ACT. The bill would preempt about 10 state laws that have been passed, many of them stronger than the SPY ACT, said Fred von Lohmann, senior intellectual property lawyer for the EFF.

In addition, the bill would take away the ability of private citizens to sue spyware creators, von Lohmann said.

The bill "would actually make things worse, insulating adware vendors from more stringent state laws and private lawsuits," von Lohmann wrote on the EFF blog in April.

[Permalink]

June 6th, 2007

Op-Ed: Copyright Silliness on Campus

Fred von Lohmann, Washington Post

What do Columbia, Vanderbilt, Duke, Howard and UCLA have in common? Apparently, leaders in Congress think that they aren't expelling enough students for illegally swapping music and movies.

[Permalink]

June 6th, 2007

An 'All You Can Eat' Approach to Fighting Piracy

Brock Read, The Chonicle of Higher Education

Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, has looked over the questionnaire on illegal file sharing that Congress sent to 19 colleges last month. And, as he makes clear in a Washington Post opinion piece, he’s not impressed.

[Permalink]

June 5th, 2007

Concerns Emerge Over iTunes User Data

May Wong, Associated Press

Apple Inc.'s recent rollout of songs without copy protection software at its iTunes Store has given consumers new flexibility, but questions have emerged over the company's inclusion of personal data in purchased music tracks...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which also analyzed the DRM-free song files on iTunes, said it did not want to jump to any conclusions on Apple's reasons for embedding the personal data...

"It just seems careless and unwise for somebody like Apple to start planting this kind of personal information without protection in the files," von Lohmann said. "It's not as bad as leaking your credit card number or your Social Security number, but it's still a pretty careless security leak."

[Permalink]

June 4th, 2007

The copyright buzz from the 'Electric Slide'

Daniel Terdiman, CNET News.com

The "Electric Slide" now has a Creative Commons license...

On May 22, Silver and the EFF announced that they had come to an arrangement: the EFF agreed to drop its lawsuit, and in return, Silver said he would no longer pursue DMCA claims against anyone portraying his dance steps in a noncommercial manner.

[Permalink]

June 2nd, 2007

Apple criticized for embedding names, e-mails in songs

Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com

It used to be that music fans believed cryptic messages about Satan or the death of a band member were hidden within rock albums.

Nowadays, the secrets buried in digital music are way too easy to find, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). The consumer watchdog group, which focuses on the Web, is taking issue with Apple's practice of embedding customer information within iTunes music.

Apple includes customer names and e-mail addresses within song files purchased from iTunes, according to Fred von Lohmann, an EFF attorney. Several tech blogs wrote about the embedded information this week after Apple launched iTunes Plus, a service that features music stripped of controversial copy-protection software.

[Permalink]

May 31st, 2007

EFF: DRM-free iTunes files carry 'more than just names and e-mail addresses'

Jacqui Cheng, Ars Technica

The morning during/after the launch of iTunes Plus yesterday was a rough one for the iTunes Store, but users were generally pleased with their newfound freedom. Or so they thought...

Well, the Electronic Frontier Foundation picked up on this newfound information about the embedded personal data and investigated a bit further. As it turns out, the DRM-free AAC files from iTunes contain more than just names and e-mail addresses. While they decoded some DRM-free AAC files to PCM/WAV and found that there isn't a watermark in the compressed audio signal, there are "surprisingly huge differences" in the encoded files. "Much bigger differences than just different tags, or even different signed/encrypted tags," the EFF wrote.

[Permalink]

May 30th, 2007

Cameras everywhere, even in online maps

Elinor Mills, CNET

Kevin Bankston, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, was surprised to see his face in a street-level image on a now defunct online map a few years ago...

"It is irresponsible for Google to debut a product like this without also debuting technological measures that would obscure the identities of people photographed by this product," he said. "If the Google van happened by your house at the right moment it could even capture you in an embarrassing state of undress, as you close your blinds, for example."

Personal indiscretions aside, the larger concern is for people entering and leaving places like domestic violence shelters, Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, fertility clinics and controversial religious or political events, Bankston said.

[Permalink]

May 30th, 2007

Cameras everywhere, even in online maps

Elinor Mills, CNET

Kevin Bankston, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, was surprised to see his face in a street-level image on a now defunct online map a few years ago...

"It is irresponsible for Google to debut a product like this without also debuting technological measures that would obscure the identities of people photographed by this product," he said. "If the Google van happened by your house at the right moment it could even capture you in an embarrassing state of undress, as you close your blinds, for example."

Personal indiscretions aside, the larger concern is for people entering and leaving places like domestic violence shelters, Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, fertility clinics and controversial religious or political events, Bankston said.

[Permalink]

May 29th, 2007

Social Mapping Firms Track Cellphone Users

Sue Kwon, CBS 5 (San Francisco)

It's a common question asked among friends: "Where are you?"

Sam Altman decided to answer that question with social mapping technology...

While both services offer ways to turn off location tracking, what concerns Electronic Frontier Foundation privacy attorney Kevin Bankston is how information on your whereabouts could be used against you in the future.

"In a legal case government or civil litigants could serve a subpeona and demand you hand over the history of everywhere you've been," said Bankston.

[Permalink]

May 29th, 2007

The Patent Puzzle

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, eWeek

Patent fights are fights about money. The secondary issue, the one that makes the headlines, is control. To really understand what's going on in the current patent posturing involving Microsoft, Novell, and a host of open-source companies and groups, it helps to keep those factors firmly in mind...

At one time, Novell was seen by many, thanks to its patent partnership with Microsoft, as being at least partly on Microsoft's side in the patent debate. Novell has always denied this. The recent publication of the bulk of the companies' patent agreement seems to support Novell's position. In addition, Novell and the Electronic Frontier Foundation joined forces on May 23 seeking to reform software patent law and attack patents that impose particularly heavy burdens on software developers by identifying prior art that can be used to invalidate such patents.

[Permalink]

May 29th, 2007

Social Mapping Firms Track Cellphone Users

Sue Kwon, CBS 5 (San Francisco)

It's a common question asked among friends: "Where are you?"

Sam Altman decided to answer that question with social mapping technology...

While both services offer ways to turn off location tracking, what concerns Electronic Frontier Foundation privacy attorney Kevin Bankston is how information on your whereabouts could be used against you in the future.

"In a legal case government or civil litigants could serve a subpeona and demand you hand over the history of everywhere you've been," said Bankston.

[Permalink]

May 29th, 2007

The Patent Puzzle

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, eWeek

Patent fights are fights about money. The secondary issue, the one that makes the headlines, is control. To really understand what's going on in the current patent posturing involving Microsoft, Novell, and a host of open-source companies and groups, it helps to keep those factors firmly in mind...

At one time, Novell was seen by many, thanks to its patent partnership with Microsoft, as being at least partly on Microsoft's side in the patent debate. Novell has always denied this. The recent publication of the bulk of the companies' patent agreement seems to support Novell's position. In addition, Novell and the Electronic Frontier Foundation joined forces on May 23 seeking to reform software patent law and attack patents that impose particularly heavy burdens on software developers by identifying prior art that can be used to invalidate such patents.

[Permalink]

May 27th, 2007

Novell: la riforma dei brevetti software passa di qui.....

Data Manager Online

Novell annuncia la propria collaborazione con l'Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) per la "Riforma dei brevetti software", con l'obiettivo di cercare di influenzare governi locali e organizzazioni nazionali e internazionali perch? sviluppino legislazioni e politiche che promuovano l'innovazione.

[Permalink]

May 27th, 2007

Novell: la riforma dei brevetti software passa di qui.....

Data Manager Online

Novell annuncia la propria collaborazione con l'Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) per la "Riforma dei brevetti software", con l'obiettivo di cercare di influenzare governi locali e organizzazioni nazionali e internazionali perch? sviluppino legislazioni e politiche che promuovano l'innovazione.

[Permalink]

May 24th, 2007

Novell joins EFF for patent reform

Stephen Shankland, CNET

Facing criticism for its patent pact with Microsoft, Novell on Wednesday said it's supporting the Electronic Frontier Foundation's effort to challenge what it believes are bogus patents...

"Novell is supporting us to ensure patents aren't going to hurt innovation," said Shari Steele, EFF's executive director. In particular, "Novell is now sponsoring us to ... export our patent-busting program to Europe," where EFF will hire legal representation, she said.

[Permalink]

May 24th, 2007

Novell joins EFF for patent reform

Stephen Shankland, CNET

Facing criticism for its patent pact with Microsoft, Novell on Wednesday said it's supporting the Electronic Frontier Foundation's effort to challenge what it believes are bogus patents...

"Novell is supporting us to ensure patents aren't going to hurt innovation," said Shari Steele, EFF's executive director. In particular, "Novell is now sponsoring us to ... export our patent-busting program to Europe," where EFF will hire legal representation, she said.

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

Copy-Protection Game Changes From Whac-A-Mole to Keep Away

Mathew Honan, Wired News

You could hardly have asked for a clearer demonstration of the futility of copy protection than the events of the past three weeks. The DVD-encryption key that sparked a user rebellion on Digg in early May is now largely moot. Despite having been posted to hundreds of thousands of websites and garnering attention worldwide, the key is now useless, because the industry group that oversees HD DVD and Blu-ray copy protection has changed its encryption scheme to use a different one...

"It apparently was highly controversial (for the AACS Licensing Administrator) to send the legal threat letters," says Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "I assume they would need to have consensus before they could step up to any lawsuits. And, in any event, it's too late for this key -- it's been immortalized as an internet celebrity thanks to the first legal threats, and will likely outlive all of us, no matter how many lawsuits are brought."

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

15 it-myter granskas - s? h?r ligger det till!

Mats L?vgren, PC for Alla

Om du laddar ned filer fr?n ett fildelningsn?tverk, ?r det s?kert att upphovsr?ttsorganisationerna kan identifiera dig? Eller br?nner bilder fast p? plasma-tv-apparater om de st?r p? f?r l?nge? H?r ?r sanningen bakom 15 av de vanligaste it-myterna.

Det g?r det sv?rare att identifiera person ifr?ga, konstaterar Peter Ecksley, tekniker p? Electronic Frontier Foundation. Att lita p? att en dynamisk ip-adress ska h?lla dig dold ?r dock l?nl?st eftersom internetoperat?rerna loggar vem som har haft en viss adress vid en viss tidpunkt.

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

Novell signs on to EFF patent busting project

Eric Bangeman, Ars Technica

In a surprise announcement earlier today at the Open Source Business Conference, Novell and the Electronic Frontier Foundation said that Novell would be contributing to the EFF's Patent Busting project. In addition, the two entities will work for legislation and policies that will "promote innovation," specifically targeting the World Intellectual Property Organization. May 23, 2007 Infoworld Novell and EFF team on patent reform Paul Roberts

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

Copy-Protection Game Changes From Whac-A-Mole to Keep Away

Mathew Honan, Wired News

You could hardly have asked for a clearer demonstration of the futility of copy protection than the events of the past three weeks. The DVD-encryption key that sparked a user rebellion on Digg in early May is now largely moot. Despite having been posted to hundreds of thousands of websites and garnering attention worldwide, the key is now useless, because the industry group that oversees HD DVD and Blu-ray copy protection has changed its encryption scheme to use a different one...

"It apparently was highly controversial (for the AACS Licensing Administrator) to send the legal threat letters," says Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "I assume they would need to have consensus before they could step up to any lawsuits. And, in any event, it's too late for this key -- it's been immortalized as an internet celebrity thanks to the first legal threats, and will likely outlive all of us, no matter how many lawsuits are brought."

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

15 it-myter granskas - s? h?r ligger det till!

Mats L?vgren, PC for Alla

Om du laddar ned filer fr?n ett fildelningsn?tverk, ?r det s?kert att upphovsr?ttsorganisationerna kan identifiera dig? Eller br?nner bilder fast p? plasma-tv-apparater om de st?r p? f?r l?nge? H?r ?r sanningen bakom 15 av de vanligaste it-myterna.

Det g?r det sv?rare att identifiera person ifr?ga, konstaterar Peter Ecksley, tekniker p? Electronic Frontier Foundation. Att lita p? att en dynamisk ip-adress ska h?lla dig dold ?r dock l?nl?st eftersom internetoperat?rerna loggar vem som har haft en viss adress vid en viss tidpunkt.

[Permalink]

May 23rd, 2007

Novell signs on to EFF patent busting project

Eric Bangeman In a surprise announcement earlier today at the Open Source Business Conference, Novell and the Electronic Frontier Foundation said that Novell would be contributing to the EFF's Patent Busting project. In addition, the two entities will work for legislation and policies that will "promote innovation," specifically targeting the World Intellectual Property Organization. May 23, 2007 Infoworld Novell and EFF team on patent reform Paul Roberts, Ars Technica

Fresh off a stinging round of criticism at the Open Source Business Conference for its licensing deal with Microsoft, Novell Inc. made an effort to change the discussion today, announcing a deal with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to reform patents worldwide.

"EFF has long been at the forefront in addressing the key challenges of the digital age, including worldwide intellectual property issues," said EFF Executive Director Shari Steele. "The support of Novell - a company founded on the proprietary software development model but now strongly embracing the open source approach - will be a great boon to our efforts to rid the industry of innovation-killing patents. We hope Novell's example encourages other software vendors to join the effort."

[Permalink]

May 21st, 2007

Support In US For WIPO Broadcasting Treaty Appears To Wane

Drew Clark, Intellectual Property Watch

Practically no one participating in a recent government forum here liked the proposed broadcaster protection treaty under negotiation at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Geneva...

"None of the concerns that we have raised at previous [forums] have been removed, or even addressed by the non-paper," said Gwen Hinze, international affairs director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Hinze said the exclusive rights framework is inappropriate and conflicts with US law. She asked for an analysis by the US government about how the treaty, if adopted, could be embodied in US law. Hinze also raised concerns about Article 9 of the draft, as well as its interaction with Article 3 (scope of protection) and Article 7 (the exclusive right to retransmission of broadcasts).

[Permalink]

May 21st, 2007

Support In US For WIPO Broadcasting Treaty Appears To Wane

Drew Clark, Intellectual Property Watch

Practically no one participating in a recent government forum here liked the proposed broadcaster protection treaty under negotiation at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Geneva...

"None of the concerns that we have raised at previous [forums] have been removed, or even addressed by the non-paper," said Gwen Hinze, international affairs director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Hinze said the exclusive rights framework is inappropriate and conflicts with US law. She asked for an analysis by the US government about how the treaty, if adopted, could be embodied in US law. Hinze also raised concerns about Article 9 of the draft, as well as its interaction with Article 3 (scope of protection) and Article 7 (the exclusive right to retransmission of broadcasts).

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Customs Breaks Privacy Laws in Data Collection, GAO Says

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

The Department of Homeland Security is breaking privacy laws by failing to tell the public all the ways it uses personal information to target passengers boarding flights entering or leaving the United States, according to a draft government report...

When government officials will not discuss what the uses and data sources are, it is hard to know whether travelers have been harmed by the screening program, said David Sobel, senior counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which in December sued the government under the Freedom of Information Act for disclosure on the Automated Targeting System, which Customs uses to screen for high-risk travelers.

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Disgraced Attorney General Wants to Criminalize Attempted Copyright Infringement

Eliot Van Buskirk, Wired

Not content to advocate the torture of enemy combatants, the wiretapping of American citizens, and the firing of US attorneys for political reasons, 13-year Bush lapdog Alberto Gonzalez has a new cause: jailing citizens who attempt to infringe copyright and seizing their property...

According to Corynne McSherry, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "It's not totally clear what would count as attempting copyright infringement," so everything from searching for music on peer-to-peer networks to posting music on an MP3 blog could be targeted.

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Google Wins Infringement Appeal

Stuart J. Johnston, Internetnews.com

A federal appeals court panel ruled Wednesday that Google did not infringe the copyrights of an adult photo publisher by displaying thumbnails of proprietary pictures in its image search engine...

The appeals court found that the thumbnails did not infringe Perfect 10's copyrights because they were "highly transformative" -- that is significantly different than the full-sized images -- and thus fit into the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (DMCA) "fair use" exception.

The term defines situations wherein a copyrighted work, or portions of it, can be legally used in a highly modified fashion without infringing the original copyright owner's rights - a classic example is a parody, Corynne McSherry, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), told internetnews.com. (The EFF filed a friend of the court brief in the case in support of Google).

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Customs Breaks Privacy Laws in Data Collection, GAO Says

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

The Department of Homeland Security is breaking privacy laws by failing to tell the public all the ways it uses personal information to target passengers boarding flights entering or leaving the United States, according to a draft government report...

When government officials will not discuss what the uses and data sources are, it is hard to know whether travelers have been harmed by the screening program, said David Sobel, senior counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which in December sued the government under the Freedom of Information Act for disclosure on the Automated Targeting System, which Customs uses to screen for high-risk travelers.

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Disgraced Attorney General Wants to Criminalize Attempted Copyright Infringement

Eliot Van Buskirk, Wired

Not content to advocate the torture of enemy combatants, the wiretapping of American citizens, and the firing of US attorneys for political reasons, 13-year Bush lapdog Alberto Gonzalez has a new cause: jailing citizens who attempt to infringe copyright and seizing their property...

According to Corynne McSherry, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "It's not totally clear what would count as attempting copyright infringement," so everything from searching for music on peer-to-peer networks to posting music on an MP3 blog could be targeted.

[Permalink]

May 16th, 2007

Google Wins Infringement Appeal

Stuart J. Johnston, Internetnews.com

A federal appeals court panel ruled Wednesday that Google did not infringe the copyrights of an adult photo publisher by displaying thumbnails of proprietary pictures in its image search engine...

The appeals court found that the thumbnails did not infringe Perfect 10's copyrights because they were "highly transformative" -- that is significantly different than the full-sized images -- and thus fit into the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (DMCA) "fair use" exception.

The term defines situations wherein a copyrighted work, or portions of it, can be legally used in a highly modified fashion without infringing the original copyright owner's rights - a classic example is a parody, Corynne McSherry, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), told internetnews.com. (The EFF filed a friend of the court brief in the case in support of Google).

[Permalink]

May 15th, 2007

Blogger Michelle Malkin Wins Copyright Fight

Technology Daily

Universal Music Group has abandoned its attempt to silence syndicated conservative columnist Michelle Malkin for her online criticism of one of the label's controversial artists, the Electronic Frontier Foundation said Monday...

EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl called the label's copyright claim "bogus" and said the company misused a 2001 copyright law. "Shame on any copyright holder who would attempt to use the DMCA [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] to intimidate and silence critics," Malkin said in a statement.

[Permalink]

May 15th, 2007

Search Firm Tosses The Cookies

Pete Barlas, Investor's Business Daily

Hakia says a "cookie"-free diet will give it some heft in the Web search field...

Hakia has won at least one important fan. He's Peter Eckersley, staff technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a consumer watchdog group.

"(Hakia's) system is really much better than the major search engines," Eckersley said.

[Permalink]

May 15th, 2007

Blogger Michelle Malkin Wins Copyright Fight

Technology Daily

Universal Music Group has abandoned its attempt to silence syndicated conservative columnist Michelle Malkin for her online criticism of one of the label's controversial artists, the Electronic Frontier Foundation said Monday...

EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl called the label's copyright claim "bogus" and said the company misused a 2001 copyright law. "Shame on any copyright holder who would attempt to use the DMCA [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] to intimidate and silence critics," Malkin said in a statement.

[Permalink]

May 15th, 2007

Search Firm Tosses The Cookies

Pete Barlas, Investor's Business Daily

Hakia says a "cookie"-free diet will give it some heft in the Web search field...

Hakia has won at least one important fan. He's Peter Eckersley, staff technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a consumer watchdog group.

"(Hakia's) system is really much better than the major search engines," Eckersley said.

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

State police again seek free access to records

Bruce Landis, Providence Journal

The state police have again drawn fire from privacy advocates by seeking legislation that would let them obtain Rhode Islanders' telephone and Internet records without a warrant or other review by the courts...

"It speaks directly to 'local and long-distance connection records,' " said Kevin Bankston, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based organization devoted to free speech, privacy and other individual rights. That "clearly would reach phone records."

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

MySpace Automates Copyright Takedown Process

Scott Gilbertson, Wired News

MySpace announced Friday that it has rolled out a new technology to fight copyright infringement on the site. The new copyright protection system, aptly titled "Take Down Stay Down," uses technology from Audible Magic to ensure that content which has already been pulled from MySpace profiles is not re-posted...

Because the system lacks a human oversight, the Electronic Frontier Foundation worries that some perfectly legal content may end up blocked as well.

Corynne McSherry, an Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney, tells CNet, "with every form of digital rights management that we've ever seen, it always gets hacked eventually, so I think it's likely that eventually this too will be hacked."

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

Victory: UMG & YouTube retreat

Michelle Malkin, Hot Air with Michelle Malkin

The Hot Air video report on Akon that Universal Music Group didn't want you to see is now back up on YouTube. That's right. The music giant and the video-sharing site (who happen to be "strategic partners") have backed down...

EFF's senior staff attorney, Kurt Opsahl, pressed YouTube for an explanation. On Friday, after Opsahl took the matter to one of Google/YouTube's in-house counsels, YouTube reinstated the video-over-ruling the prior terms of use decision.

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

State police again seek free access to records

Bruce Landis, Providence Journal

The state police have again drawn fire from privacy advocates by seeking legislation that would let them obtain Rhode Islanders' telephone and Internet records without a warrant or other review by the courts...

"It speaks directly to 'local and long-distance connection records,' " said Kevin Bankston, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based organization devoted to free speech, privacy and other individual rights. That "clearly would reach phone records."

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

MySpace Automates Copyright Takedown Process

Scott Gilbertson, Wired News

MySpace announced Friday that it has rolled out a new technology to fight copyright infringement on the site. The new copyright protection system, aptly titled "Take Down Stay Down," uses technology from Audible Magic to ensure that content which has already been pulled from MySpace profiles is not re-posted...

Because the system lacks a human oversight, the Electronic Frontier Foundation worries that some perfectly legal content may end up blocked as well.

Corynne McSherry, an Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney, tells CNet, "with every form of digital rights management that we've ever seen, it always gets hacked eventually, so I think it's likely that eventually this too will be hacked."

[Permalink]

May 14th, 2007

Victory: UMG & YouTube retreat

Michelle Malkin, Hot Air with Michelle Malkin

The Hot Air video report on Akon that Universal Music Group didn't want you to see is now back up on YouTube. That's right. The music giant and the video-sharing site (who happen to be "strategic partners") have backed down...

EFF's senior staff attorney, Kurt Opsahl, pressed YouTube for an explanation. On Friday, after Opsahl took the matter to one of Google/YouTube's in-house counsels, YouTube reinstated the video-over-ruling the prior terms of use decision.

[Permalink]

May 12th, 2007

MySpace adds new anti-piracy feature

Elise Ackerman, San Jose Mercury News

MySpace and Dailymotion, a popular French video site, announced Friday separate initiatives to prevent copyrighted material from being misused, increasing pressure on Google to more aggressively police its YouTube subsidiary...

Corynne McSherry, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based group that advocates for digital rights, said the problem with the feature is that it doesn't allow for "fair use," a legal concept that gives ordinary people the right to quote from books, cite newspaper articles and sing their favorite songs without seeking prior authorization.

"Fair use means you don't have to ask permission," McSherry said.

McSherry said she was also concerned about what would happen if a take-down request was disputed. "In that case it seems that further human review would be appropriate," McSherry said.

[Permalink]

May 12th, 2007

MySpace adds new anti-piracy feature

Elise Ackerman, San Jose Mercury News

MySpace and Dailymotion, a popular French video site, announced Friday separate initiatives to prevent copyrighted material from being misused, increasing pressure on Google to more aggressively police its YouTube subsidiary...

Corynne McSherry, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based group that advocates for digital rights, said the problem with the feature is that it doesn't allow for "fair use," a legal concept that gives ordinary people the right to quote from books, cite newspaper articles and sing their favorite songs without seeking prior authorization.

"Fair use means you don't have to ask permission," McSherry said.

McSherry said she was also concerned about what would happen if a take-down request was disputed. "In that case it seems that further human review would be appropriate," McSherry said.

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

The Streisand Effect

Andy Greenberg, Forbes

A Web user and his information are like a grizzly and her cub. Come between them, and you're likely to get mauled...

"The Web," Bankston says, "is like the mythical Hydra. Cut off one of its many heads, and two will grow back in its place."

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

YouTube Caught In Malkin, EFF, UMG Crossfire

Jason Lee Miller, WebProNews

Conservative blogger and columnist Michelle Malkin is crying foul after a music industry DMCA notice quieted her criticism of Hip Hop artist Akon...

Between Malkin and UMG is a hard enough spot to be in, but add the EFF into the melee and you've got yourself a first class nightmare. The EFF called UMG's actions an "improper attempt to silence her online criticism of one of its artists."

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

Electronic Frontier Foundation sues Uri Geller

Associated Press

An online civil liberties group has sued self-proclaimed psychic Uri Geller for using "baseless copyright claims" to silence critics who question his paranormal powers.

The suit filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation came after Geller, the Israeli television star who claims to bend spoons by mental forces, sued critic Brian Sapient in federal court on Monday after Sapient published an excerpt of copyrighted material on the video-sharing site, YouTube.

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

The Streisand Effect

Andy Greenberg, Forbes

A Web user and his information are like a grizzly and her cub. Come between them, and you're likely to get mauled...

"The Web," Bankston says, "is like the mythical Hydra. Cut off one of its many heads, and two will grow back in its place."

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

YouTube Caught In Malkin, EFF, UMG Crossfire

Jason Lee Miller, WebProNews

Conservative blogger and columnist Michelle Malkin is crying foul after a music industry DMCA notice quieted her criticism of Hip Hop artist Akon...

Between Malkin and UMG is a hard enough spot to be in, but add the EFF into the melee and you've got yourself a first class nightmare. The EFF called UMG's actions an "improper attempt to silence her online criticism of one of its artists."

[Permalink]

May 11th, 2007

Electronic Frontier Foundation sues Uri Geller

Associated Press

An online civil liberties group has sued self-proclaimed psychic Uri Geller for using "baseless copyright claims" to silence critics who question his paranormal powers.

The suit filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation came after Geller, the Israeli television star who claims to bend spoons by mental forces, sued critic Brian Sapient in federal court on Monday after Sapient published an excerpt of copyrighted material on the video-sharing site, YouTube.

[Permalink]

May 10th, 2007

Psychic fighting YouTube clips sued by SF group

Jim Herron Zamora, San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation this week jumped into a legal battle involving efforts by self-described psychic Uri Geller - who is famous for claiming to bend spoons by mental forces -- to censor video clips of him posted on YouTube...

"Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law," said foundation attorney Marcia Hoffman. "If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use -- it's as simple as that."

[Permalink]

May 10th, 2007

Psychic fighting YouTube clips sued by SF group

Jim Herron Zamora, San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation this week jumped into a legal battle involving efforts by self-described psychic Uri Geller - who is famous for claiming to bend spoons by mental forces -- to censor video clips of him posted on YouTube...

"Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law," said foundation attorney Marcia Hoffman. "If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use -- it's as simple as that."

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Hot Air & EFF challenge UMG

Michelle Malkin, Hot Air with Michelle Malkin

Heads-up, readers and viewers! We are teaming up with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to contest Universal Music Group's takedown of our Akon report on YouTube.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

'Psychic' Uri Geller sues over video clip on YouTube

Declan McCullagh, CNET

Early Wednesday we told you about a lawsuit that the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed against so-called psychic Uri Geller over allegedly misusing copyright law to silence critics on YouTube...

If EFF is right, Geller could face legal liability and be forced to cough up some cash. In an earlier case, EFF managed to extract $125,000 from Diebold for misusing the DMCA takedown process.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Ruckus will likely replace CDigix

Ben Slivnick, The Diamondback (University of Maryland)

A largely overlooked music streaming service available free to college students nationwide since January may rise to new prominence on the campus, as OIT officials consider signing an agreement with Ruckus Network, Inc...

CDigix has repeatedly declined to release statistics on the number of students who used the service, it received a lukewarm reception on the campus because students had to pay an extra fee to download songs and it wasn't available on Apple computers.

And with many of these same pitfalls present in the Ruckus service, Rebecca Jeschke, media relations coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Internet activist organization, said she was hardly surprised more students weren't using the software already.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Spoon-bending psychic sued over Youtube boob

The Inquirer

Israeli psychic Uri Geller is being sued after kicking up a fuss over a video clip posted on Youtube which claims to expose the alleged 'secrets' of his spoon bending antics...

"Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law," said Marcia Hoffman, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation which is representing Sapient.

"If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use -- it's as simple as that."

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Uri Geller sued after quashing questioning clip

PC Pro

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has sued Uri Geller after he persuaded YouTube to remove a video, which he said violated his copyright...

'Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law,' said EFF staff attorney Marcia Hoffman. 'If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use - it's as simple as that.'

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

EFF to psychic: There will be a DMCA abuse suit in the near future

Jacqui Cheng, Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has begun fighting back this week against one DMCA takedown abuser. The organization has filed a lawsuit against "paranormalist" Uri Geller for sending a takedown notice to YouTube over a video that heavily criticizes his psychic and magical abilities...

Sapient, with the help of the EFF, seized this opportunity to turn Geller's obvious abuse of the DMCA into an example for other abusers."We filed the lawsuit to protect our client's free speech rights and to fight back again illegal use of the DMCA takedown process," EFF staff attorney Jason Schultz told Ars Technica. "We believe the sole reason Geller sent the takedown was to silence our client's free speech critiquing him."

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Just An Online Minute... Can Magician Make Lawsuit Disappear?

Wendy Davis, Mediapost

Entertainer Uri Geller has landed in court - the latest defendant in a string of cases related to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...

In the Geller lawsuit, the EFF claims that Geller and/or his representatives demanded YouTube purge a 13-minute video of NOVA's "Secrets of the Psychics," which purports to debunk Geller's "psychic" shenanigans. But the clip contains only three seconds of material owned by Geller - "a classic fair use of the material for criticism purposes," according to the EFF.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

EFF Enters New Legal Skirmish Over YouTube Clip

Adario Strange, Wired News

In what will surely go down in the history books as their oddest adversary, the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) has locked horns with none other than paranormal pop start Uri Geller. Geller, known in the past for his "ability" to bend spoons with his mind, issued a takedown notice to a YouTuber named Brian Sapient who posted video of the magic man.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Spoon-bending psychic sued over Youtube boob

The Inquirer

Israeli psychic Uri Geller is being sued after kicking up a fuss over a video clip posted on Youtube which claims to expose the alleged 'secrets' of his spoon bending antics...

"Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law," said Marcia Hoffman, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation which is representing Sapient.

"If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use -- it's as simple as that."

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Hot Air & EFF challenge UMG

Michelle Malkin, Hot Air with Michelle Malkin

Heads-up, readers and viewers! We are teaming up with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to contest Universal Music Group's takedown of our Akon report on YouTube.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Uri Geller sued after quashing questioning clip

PC Pro

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has sued Uri Geller after he persuaded YouTube to remove a video, which he said violated his copyright...

'Uri Geller may not like it when people question his paranormal abilities. However, he is not allowed to stifle public criticism by misusing the law,' said EFF staff attorney Marcia Hoffman. 'If the publication of a video does not infringe his copyright, then he cannot block its use - it's as simple as that.'

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

'Psychic' Uri Geller sues over video clip on YouTube

Declan McCullagh, CNET

Early Wednesday we told you about a lawsuit that the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed against so-called psychic Uri Geller over allegedly misusing copyright law to silence critics on YouTube...

If EFF is right, Geller could face legal liability and be forced to cough up some cash. In an earlier case, EFF managed to extract $125,000 from Diebold for misusing the DMCA takedown process.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

Just An Online Minute... Can Magician Make Lawsuit Disappear?

Wendy Davis, Mediapost

Entertainer Uri Geller has landed in court - the latest defendant in a string of cases related to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...

In the Geller lawsuit, the EFF claims that Geller and/or his representatives demanded YouTube purge a 13-minute video of NOVA's "Secrets of the Psychics," which purports to debunk Geller's "psychic" shenanigans. But the clip contains only three seconds of material owned by Geller - "a classic fair use of the material for criticism purposes," according to the EFF.

[Permalink]

May 9th, 2007

EFF Enters New Legal Skirmish Over YouTube Clip

Adario Strange, Wired News

In what will surely go down in the history books as their oddest adversary, the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) has locked horns with none other than paranormal pop start Uri Geller. Geller, known in the past for his "ability" to bend spoons with his mind, issued a takedown notice to a YouTuber named Brian Sapient who posted video of the magic man.

[Permalink]

May 8th, 2007

Internet Calls Subject To Phone Tapping

Eric Thomas, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

Companies that provide Internet phone service have just six days to meet a deadline from the Justice Department. By next Monday, they'll have to make their systems easier to tap. That's right -- make it easier to secretly listen in on your phone calls, or face daily fines of $10,000 dollars...

But the law seemed to exempt phone calls made over the Internet.

Lee Tien, Electronic Frontier Foundation: "At least that's what most people thought."

Not the FBI or Justice Department. In 2004, they convinced the FCC to expand the law to cover Voice over Internet Protocol or VoIP calls.

Lee Tien: "Every privacy group was against it because we thought there were major problems there, but we lost."

[Permalink]

May 8th, 2007

Internet Calls Subject To Phone Tapping

Eric Thomas, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

Companies that provide Internet phone service have just six days to meet a deadline from the Justice Department. By next Monday, they'll have to make their systems easier to tap. That's right -- make it easier to secretly listen in on your phone calls, or face daily fines of $10,000 dollars...

But the law seemed to exempt phone calls made over the Internet.

Lee Tien, Electronic Frontier Foundation: "At least that's what most people thought."

Not the FBI or Justice Department. In 2004, they convinced the FCC to expand the law to cover Voice over Internet Protocol or VoIP calls.

Lee Tien: "Every privacy group was against it because we thought there were major problems there, but we lost."

[Permalink]

May 7th, 2007

The Grill: Electronic Frontier Foundation's Fred von Lohmann on the Hot Seat

Thomas Hoffman, ComputerWorld

In March, Viacom International Inc. filed a $1 billion-plus lawsuit against YouTube Inc. parent Google Inc., claiming that YouTube infringed Viacom copyrights by streaming more than 1.5 billion clips of TV shows such as The Colbert Report and SpongeBob SquarePants. The outcome will help determine whether Web-hosting sites are protected under the so-called Safe Harbor provisions of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The case will also likely have a major bearing on how copyrights, patents and intellectual property are treated in the evolving digital landscape.

[Permalink]

May 7th, 2007

5 questions for Fred von Lohmann

USA TODAY

Entertainment industry lawyers recently sent cease-and-desist letters to several websites, including popular news site Digg. Their alleged offense: posting information that could be used to break copy protection on high definition DVDs. When Internet users learned of the lawyers' demands, they protested by spreading the information over thousands of sites. Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation, explains what all the fuss is about.

[Permalink]

May 7th, 2007

The Grill: Electronic Frontier Foundation's Fred von Lohmann on the Hot Seat

Thomas Hoffman, ComputerWorld

In March, Viacom International Inc. filed a $1 billion-plus lawsuit against YouTube Inc. parent Google Inc., claiming that YouTube infringed Viacom copyrights by streaming more than 1.5 billion clips of TV shows such as The Colbert Report and SpongeBob SquarePants. The outcome will help determine whether Web-hosting sites are protected under the so-called Safe Harbor provisions of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The case will also likely have a major bearing on how copyrights, patents and intellectual property are treated in the evolving digital landscape.

[Permalink]

May 7th, 2007

5 questions for Fred von Lohmann

USA TODAY

Entertainment industry lawyers recently sent cease-and-desist letters to several websites, including popular news site Digg. Their alleged offense: posting information that could be used to break copy protection on high definition DVDs. When Internet users learned of the lawyers' demands, they protested by spreading the information over thousands of sites. Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation, explains what all the fuss is about.

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Phones studied as attack detector

Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

The government is researching whether the best defense against a chemical, biological or radiological attack might one day be right in everyone's hands - or on their ears...

Kevin Bankston of the Electronic Frontier Foundation says he's wary of any program in which "consumer products become surveillance devices for the government."

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Wrestling With the Copyright Takedown

Corynne McSherry, The Recorder

Last month, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Stanford Fair Use Project filed a lawsuit against Viacom International to protect the free-speech rights of MoveOn.org and Brave New Films. Viacom had improperly issued a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice to YouTube over "Stop the Falsiness" - a humorous video built around clips from Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report." The video was clearly a parody and, therefore, a non-infringing fair use.

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Bush administration proposes retroactive immunity for phone companies

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

Retroactive immunity from prosecution is a beautiful thing if you're a major telecommunications provider in the US, and phone companies are about to receive it if the Bush administration gets its way...

With Congress unwilling to figure out what was going on, individuals and advocacy groups began filing lawsuits against the phone companies. The EFF and others argued that communications privacy laws had been violated, but the government countered by claiming that a "state secrets" privilege meant that the cases should simply be thrown out. Though some cases were dismissed, the EFF's case against AT&T continues, though it would also be dismissed if the proposed new legislation passes.

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Bush Wants Phone Firms Immune to Privacy Suits

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

The Bush administration is urging Congress to pass a law that would halt dozens of lawsuits charging phone companies with invading ordinary citizens' privacy through a post-Sept. 11 warrantless surveillance program...

"To let them off the hook now sets a dangerous precedent by encouraging them to continue to engage in illegal collaborations with the government in the future," said Kevin Bankston, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which last year filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T, charging that the company allowed the government to unlawfully monitor U.S. residents."

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Phones studied as attack detector

Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

The government is researching whether the best defense against a chemical, biological or radiological attack might one day be right in everyone's hands - or on their ears...

Kevin Bankston of the Electronic Frontier Foundation says he's wary of any program in which "consumer products become surveillance devices for the government."

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Wrestling With the Copyright Takedown

Corynne McSherry, The Recorder

Last month, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Stanford Fair Use Project filed a lawsuit against Viacom International to protect the free-speech rights of MoveOn.org and Brave New Films. Viacom had improperly issued a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice to YouTube over "Stop the Falsiness" - a humorous video built around clips from Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report." The video was clearly a parody and, therefore, a non-infringing fair use.

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Bush administration proposes retroactive immunity for phone companies

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

Retroactive immunity from prosecution is a beautiful thing if you're a major telecommunications provider in the US, and phone companies are about to receive it if the Bush administration gets its way...

With Congress unwilling to figure out what was going on, individuals and advocacy groups began filing lawsuits against the phone companies. The EFF and others argued that communications privacy laws had been violated, but the government countered by claiming that a "state secrets" privilege meant that the cases should simply be thrown out. Though some cases were dismissed, the EFF's case against AT&T continues, though it would also be dismissed if the proposed new legislation passes.

[Permalink]

May 4th, 2007

Bush Wants Phone Firms Immune to Privacy Suits

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

The Bush administration is urging Congress to pass a law that would halt dozens of lawsuits charging phone companies with invading ordinary citizens' privacy through a post-Sept. 11 warrantless surveillance program...

"To let them off the hook now sets a dangerous precedent by encouraging them to continue to engage in illegal collaborations with the government in the future," said Kevin Bankston, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which last year filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T, charging that the company allowed the government to unlawfully monitor U.S. residents."

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Web Users Unite Against DRM: Antipiracy Code Now Public

http://www.hardwarezone.com/news/view.php?id=7185&cid=10 Francis Yeo, New York Times

There is open revolt on the Web...

"It's a perfect example of how a lawyer's involvement can turn a little story into a huge story," said Fred von Lohmann, a staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group. "Now that they started sending threatening letters, the Internet has turned the number into the latest celebrity. It is now guaranteed eternal fame."

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Digg Reverses Course After Online Uproar

Larry Magid, CBS News

The Web site Digg - where people get to submit links to articles and blog items that they think others should pay attention to - has been involved in a hailstorm of controversy this week over its initial adherence and eventual rejection of a legal notice from a movie industry anti-piracy group...

But Fred Von Lohmann, intellectual property attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, doesn't think there's much chance that Digg will "die" as a result of the decision.

"It's very unlikely that the AACS is going to sue Digg over this," he said in an interview.

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Anti-piracy secret code posted on net

UPI

Savvy U.S. Internet users are distributing a code used by the technology and movie industries to thwart piracy of high-definition films...

"It's a perfect example of how a lawyer's involvement can turn a little story into a huge story, said Fred von Lohmann, a staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group. Now that they started sending threatening letters, the Internet has turned the number into the latest celebrity."

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Web Users Unite Against DRM: Antipiracy Code Now Public

http://www.hardwarezone.com/news/view.php?id=7185&cid=10 Francis Yeo, New York Times

There is open revolt on the Web...

"It's a perfect example of how a lawyer's involvement can turn a little story into a huge story," said Fred von Lohmann, a staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group. "Now that they started sending threatening letters, the Internet has turned the number into the latest celebrity. It is now guaranteed eternal fame."

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Digg Reverses Course After Online Uproar

Larry Magid, CBS News

The Web site Digg - where people get to submit links to articles and blog items that they think others should pay attention to - has been involved in a hailstorm of controversy this week over its initial adherence and eventual rejection of a legal notice from a movie industry anti-piracy group...

But Fred Von Lohmann, intellectual property attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, doesn't think there's much chance that Digg will "die" as a result of the decision.

"It's very unlikely that the AACS is going to sue Digg over this," he said in an interview.

[Permalink]

May 3rd, 2007

Anti-piracy secret code posted on net

UPI

Savvy U.S. Internet users are distributing a code used by the technology and movie industries to thwart piracy of high-definition films...

"It's a perfect example of how a lawyer's involvement can turn a little story into a huge story, said Fred von Lohmann, a staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group. Now that they started sending threatening letters, the Internet has turned the number into the latest celebrity."

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Digg's Dilemma

Andy Greenberg, Forbes

The Web 2.0 movement is based, in theory, on the idea that everyone on the Internet gets to have his or her say. But what happens when visitors to Web 2.0 sites start pushing the legal limits of free speech?...

All of that, says Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, means Digg is in uncharted legal territory. "This sort of issue is one of the least explored areas of the law and the Internet," he says.

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Egypt's bloggers do it better

CafeBabel

In some UN member countries, censorship-free media is still a wishful fantasy...

Danny O'Brien, 39, a specialist from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says that such technology is readily available and used in European countries. 'In the UK, British Telecom cooperates with non-governmental organisations, such as the Internet Watch Foundation. They look for websites that contain child pornography and block their users from accessing these sites or individual URLs.'

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Western states urge delaying standard driver's license law

Aurelio Rojas, Sacramento Bee

Department of motor vehicles officials from Western states on Tuesday urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to delay implementation of a law requiring states to standardize driver's licenses...

Derek Slater of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group, noted that the regulations leave it to states to secure personal information.

"It will be the weakest states' guidelines that will lay the basis of protection," Slater said. "DHS regulations cannot fix the fundamental problems with the Real ID.

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Digg's Dilemma

Andy Greenberg, Forbes

The Web 2.0 movement is based, in theory, on the idea that everyone on the Internet gets to have his or her say. But what happens when visitors to Web 2.0 sites start pushing the legal limits of free speech?...

All of that, says Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, means Digg is in uncharted legal territory. "This sort of issue is one of the least explored areas of the law and the Internet," he says.

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Egypt's bloggers do it better

CafeBabel

In some UN member countries, censorship-free media is still a wishful fantasy...

Danny O'Brien, 39, a specialist from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says that such technology is readily available and used in European countries. 'In the UK, British Telecom cooperates with non-governmental organisations, such as the Internet Watch Foundation. They look for websites that contain child pornography and block their users from accessing these sites or individual URLs.'

[Permalink]

May 2nd, 2007

Western states urge delaying standard driver's license law

Aurelio Rojas, Sacramento Bee

Department of motor vehicles officials from Western states on Tuesday urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to delay implementation of a law requiring states to standardize driver's licenses...

Derek Slater of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group, noted that the regulations leave it to states to secure personal information.

"It will be the weakest states' guidelines that will lay the basis of protection," Slater said. "DHS regulations cannot fix the fundamental problems with the Real ID.

[Permalink]

April 30th, 2007

Administrators Limit Student Site's Content

Clifford M. Marks, Harvard Crimson

Less than a week after this month's launch of CrimsonConnect.com, a student-driven portal created as an alternative to the University's my.harvard.edu Web site, the project's leader received an e-mail from Harvard administrators requesting that PIN-protected content be removed from the portal...

"I will say that in general, factual information is not something the University can restrict as a copyright thing," said Jason Schultz, a staff attorney who specializes in intellectual property law at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "From a legal point of getting sued, factual information is one of the solid grounds you can have for republishing."

[Permalink]

April 30th, 2007

Property web site takes snooping a step further

Sue McAllister, San Jose Mercury News

It's simple these days to find vast amounts of free real estate information online, including photos of houses for sale, value estimates and recent sales data - information that until recently was hard for most consumers to find...

Government databases of property records for years have been sold to private companies who use them for marketing purposes, among other things, said Lee Tien, senior staff attorney for San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation, which addresses such questions as whether the government should be archiving as much information as it does.

"Public records have always been a double-edged sword for privacy, but it didn't hit us in the face most of the time," the way it does in the Internet age, he said. Some consumers will be upset about PropertyShark's display of data, he said, "then we'll have a public dialogue about it, which is the way it has to be."

[Permalink]

April 29th, 2007

Baldwin's big mouth sends new message

CW Nevius, San Francisco Chronicle

Actor Alec Baldwin isn't likely to win Father of the Year. However, he's well on his way to winning Phone Message of the Year...

"I'll bet you will be able to find that phone tape in 50 years,'' says Jason Schultz, staff attorney for the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, a free-speech and privacy nonprofit.

[Permalink]

April 28th, 2007

Studios want security at cinemas to stop piracy

CBC

Hollywood studios are stepping up their efforts to prevent movie piracy in Canada by hiring security to search for camcorders at the openings of blockbuster movies...

Ren Bucholz of online advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation said studios are looking in the wrong place to stop pirates.

[Permalink]

April 27th, 2007

New spyware legislation a mixed bag

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

A comprehensive spyware bill recently cleared the House Energy & Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection (it flows trippingly from the tongue, no?) and is busy stirring up controversy...

Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney for the EFF, said in a statement that "this is a terrible move" because "software and adware vendors are trying to quietly block consumer class actions that could target their misbehavior." The EFF believes, for instance, that it could not have brought suit against Sony BMG for the rootkit that was installed on many of the company's CDs if this law had been in place at the time. "If Congress is serious about enacting tough anti-spyware laws," von Lohmann continued, "it should create incentives that would encourage private citizens to pursue the bad guys."

[Permalink]

April 26th, 2007

Carte Blanche Criminal Law a Threat to Innovation

Ag-IP-news

The European Parliament voted today on the first Community criminal law ever, the Criminal Measures IP directive...

An alliance of European Consumer's Organization (BEUC), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Foundation for a free Information Infrastructure (FFII) and the European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Associations (EBLIDA), representing European consumers, innovators and library associations, strongly oppose certain provisions of the proposed directive on the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs).

[Permalink]

April 26th, 2007

To avoid court showdown, lawmakers may tweak online trademark registry program

Linda Fantin, Salt Lake Tribune

Legislative leaders are looking to tweak a troublesome trademark protection program rather than defend it in court, after an unprecedented meeting with Internet power brokers who would prefer the new registry be scrapped...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation says the law may be in conflict with existing federal laws and is "a dangerous step toward transforming trademarks into monopolies on language" that courts have struck down.

[Permalink]

April 26th, 2007

IPRED2 passes, with tweaks to protect personal copying

Mark Ballard and Lucy Sherriff, The Register

The European Parliament voted yesterday to pass legislation that could still see people copying music or movies for their own personal use stand in the dock alongside hard-nosed counterfeiters and commercial copyright blaggers...

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) spokesman Danny O'Brien says there were really only two good possible outcomes: the first would have been an outright rejection. The other would be that the directive was so badly drafted and so unclear that the council would be unwilling to let it pass into criminal law and would tear it apart.

[Permalink]

April 26th, 2007

IP Enforcement Directive Clears EU Parliament But Opposition Remains

Dugie Standeford, Intellectual Property Watch

A European Commission proposal to criminalise intentional, for-profit intellectual property counterfeiting and piracy won backing from the European Parliament on 25 April. The 374-278 first-reading vote on an amended version of the IP enforcement rights directive, known as IPRED2, followed months of controversy and heavy lobbying which show no signs of abating...

Defining commercial scale as "obtaining by a commercial advantage" does not make it clear "if saving money by filesharing instead of buying CDs would give anyone a commercial advantage or not," said Erik Josefsson, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF's) European affairs coordinator. If it did, he said, the act of sharing files would, under Zingaretti's definition, not be considered private use for personal and not-for-profit purposes.

[Permalink]

April 26th, 2007

Controversial copyright directive passes European Parliament

Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica

The Second Intellectual Property Enforcement Directive (IPRED2), which we last covered earlier this month, came another step closer to passage yesterday, as it was approved by the European Parliament...

Ren Bucholz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation notes that the relatively close vote-374 to 278-points to growing opposition to the directive across Europe. The directive will now go to the Council of the European Union, which is made up of representatives of the governments of each of the EU's member countries.

[Permalink]

April 25th, 2007

U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Companies Should Be Allowed To Break Law if Helping Government

Ryan Singel, Wired News

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is arguing to a federal appeals court that laws shouldn't apply to companies that help the government in the name of homeland security and that the court should dismiss a suit against AT&T for allegedly violating federal privacy laws in helping the government spy on Americans without warrants...

The group filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals last month, as the court prepares to hear an appeal of a lower court decision allowing a suit against AT&T by the Electronic Frontier Foundation to proceed, despite the government's attempt to squash the case by arguing that the case will imperil national security.

[Permalink]

April 24th, 2007

YouTube Is Not A Crime: EFF And Viacom Settle Up

Scott Gilbertson, Wired News

The EFF has dismissed its lawsuit against Viacom. The suit was originally filed last month on behalf of MoveOn and Brave New Films after Viacom sent a massive number of DMCA takedown notices to YouTube which resulted in the removal of content that was in no way related to Viacom,

In a note on the EFF site yesterday the foundation writes that it dropped the suit because "Viacom acknowledged their mistake, told us about the policies it has put in place to protect fair use on YouTube, and agreed to introduce improvements to those policies."

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

SF Activist Groups Drop Viacom Lawsuit Over Colbert Parody

KTVU and Bay City News

Two activist groups Monday dismissed a lawsuit they filed in federal court in San Francisco last month against Viacom International Inc. for demanding removal of a parody of the Colbert Report from YouTube...

Fred Von Lohmann, an Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyer who represented MoveOn.org, said the media conglomerate had taken important steps "to respect newsworthy and transformative uses of their material."

The attorney said, "We hope other media companies will follow Viacom's lead."

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

Viacom: We goofed on Colbert parody takedown notice; case dismissed

Eric Bangeman, Ars Technica

The Electronic Frontier Foundation and Viacom have agreed to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Viacom of misusing the DMCA after the entertainment company admitted it erred in issuing a takedown notice to YouTube. The EFF and the Stanford Law School's Fair Use Project filed the lawsuit after Viacom issued the DMCA takedown notice over a clip parodying comedian Stephen Colbert, whose Colbert Report airs on Viacom's Comedy Central channel...

"With Viacom sending more than 160,000 DMCA takedown notices, it may not even be aware which videos it told YouTube to remove," said the EFF. "If that's right, then Viacom will inevitably end up censoring some perfectly legitimate videos-surely, the MoveOn/Brave New Films video is not the only example of a fair use that got caught in Viacom's driftnet."

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

Activist groups drop lawsuit against Viacom over removal of parody on YouTube

Anick Jesdanun, Associated Press

Activist groups dropped a federal lawsuit against Viacom Inc. on Monday after the parent of Comedy Central acknowledged it made a mistake by asking YouTube to yank a parody of the cable network's "The Colbert Report"...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation declared victory in announcing that Viacom agreed to add information on its Web site about its stance on such parodies and to set up an e-mail address to receive complaints about possible errors in the future.

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

Policing Web Video With 'Fingerprints'

Kevin J. Delaney, Brooks Barnes, and Matthew Karnitschnig, Wall Street Journal

Can "fingerprinting" bring a truce to the Web's video-copyright wars?..

Video-sharing sites such as YouTube say they are protected from liability for copyright claims under "safe harbor" provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. But, under the DMCA, sites that have "actual knowledge" or control of infringing content can lose such protections. "What these filters do is potentially create more knowledge, more awareness of what's going on," says Fred von Lohmann, senior intellectual-property attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "There is some residual risk that you could lose the safe-harbor protections if you have too much of that kind of knowledge."

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

EFF Makes Viacom Cry Uncle On Fair Use

Jason Lee Miller, WebProNews

We've said it before: It's not a good idea to eff with the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation). Now that Viacom has admitted it effed up by ordering the take down of a parody on YouTube, the EFF and Stanford Law's Fair Use Project (FUP, or as they collectively should be known, EFF-FUP) have dismissed their lawsuit.

[Permalink]

April 23rd, 2007

EFF Drops Viacom Suit

Mat Honan, Wired News

The EFF announced that its dropping its lawsuit against Viacom on Monday after the company admitted error in issuing a DMCA takedown notice against a YouTube parody of The Colbert Report. The DMCA takedown prompted the EFF to file a lawsuit on behalf of the video's creators, MoveOn.org and Brave New Films. The EFF has now dismissed that suit following action from Viacom.

[Permalink]

April 21st, 2007

www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_5707972

Editorial: "Increase information access", Denver Post

The 1966 federal Freedom of Information Act is an incomparable tool for citizens, businesses, organizations and journalists who need access to government documents.

Unfortunately, it's a tool that the government all too often makes as hard as possible to use.

A recent Washington Post item noted the FBI had told a federal court that it could comply with a request from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group that works to protect privacy - but it couldn't finish the work until 2013.

[Permalink]

April 20th, 2007

Utah's Scared of the Internet

Jason Lee Miller, WebProNews

Utah lawmakers are at it again, mulling a legislative crackdown on open wi-fi connections because they make it easier for children to access online pornography...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has already taken Utah to task on "dangerous" laws. Given that the EFF isn't afraid of the FBI or the European Union, and has a history of spanking its opponents, Utah may be in for some trouble.

[Permalink]

April 19th, 2007

Copyright protection warning for Web 2.0 start ups

Gavin Clarke, The Register

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has given Web 2.0 media sharing start-ups some non-technical advice: run your ideas past a lawyer first to stay on the right side of copyright law...

"One of the big mistakes I see in this space is failure to engage legal counsel soon enough. Often these involve business issues - like how do you want users and employees to interact on the site," staff attorney Fred von Lohman said.

[Permalink]

April 19th, 2007

Judge rules county violated election law

Ian Hoffman, The Daily Review

A state judge has found that elections officials in Alameda County violated the California Constitution and election law by refusing to provide data about Diebold touchscreen voting machinery to proponents of a failed ballot initiative seeking a recount...

Matt Zimmerman, an electronic-voting expert at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, applauded the ruling is "an absolute, best-case scenario." "There's certainly no motivation here for elections officials to want to voluntarily turn this over because any indication that anything went wrong implicates their administration and their selection of the machines in the first place," Zimmerman said. "We haven't had a good ruling like this to tell elections officials to follow the law."

[Permalink]

April 18th, 2007

Open Source, Transparency and Electronic Voting

John P. Mello Jr., TechNewsWorld

Transparency has become a rallying cry for critics of existing electronic voting systems mad by secretive corporations jealously guarding the software code inside their products...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has been frustrated by the clandestine nature of the electronic voting systems it has encountered, according to Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman.

Speaking before a congressional subcommittee on elections last month, Zimmerman testified, "EFF has served, among other roles, as both election observers and as legal counsel for voters who felt compelled to challenge the use of results of apparently malfunctioning voting equipment.

"In both capacities, we and others have been severely hampered by the lack of transparency inherent in the current closed technological regime.

"For both of these purposes, the use of open or disclosed source voting technology as a component of a more open election process would immediately and demonstrably lead to a more competent electorate," he stated.

[Permalink]

April 17th, 2007

Internet freedom group wants delay in Utah law

Glen Warchol, Salt Lake Tribune

A organization dedicated to protecting Internet freedom Monday asked Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff to halt implementation of Utah's new Trademark Protection Act, saying it will harm consumers and threatens free speech.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation urged Shurtleff to delay the law's June 30 implementation because consumer groups and law professors "believe that the legislation's restrictions on using trademarks to trigger competitive advertising will have a devastating effect on Internet users, online speech, and Internet commerce."

[Permalink]

April 17th, 2007

Google plan raises privacy issue

Joseph Menn, Los Angeles Times

Google Inc.'s purchase of DoubleClick Inc. would create the world's single largest repository of details about people's behavior online, an unnerving prospect for some privacy experts...

"This is something that is concerning," said Kurt Opsahl, an attorney with the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

April 17th, 2007

Privacy concerns dog Google-DoubleClick deal

Stefanie Olsen, CNET

There is growing unease among consumer privacy advocates over Google's proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick...

"This is bringing together two very large advertising networks. To the extent that information is being centralized raises concerns that it could become a target" for hackers or overzealous government investigators, said Kurt Opsahl, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a legal advocacy group. "Google said it has no plans to integrate the two services...but that doesn't mean that later, you might not develop those plans."

[Permalink]

April 14th, 2007

Soldiers' stories and then some -- series brings home both sides of war

David Wiegand, San Francisco Chronicle

"America at a Crossroads" is the 11-part documentary series supposedly designed to prove that the Public Broadcasting System isn't a teeming nest of lily-livered, anti-war, Bush-bashing liberals, so please don't cut off our funding...

But perhaps the scariest film of all is "Security Versus Liberty: The Other War" (9 p.m. Friday), which reminds us that the protection of liberty is often at odds with liberty itself. The film looks at the ongoing tug of war between the Bush administration, armed with the Homeland Security Act, and groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, not to mention a group of Connecticut librarians who fought the government's efforts to acquire information on book borrowers through something called a National Security Letter.

[Permalink]

April 13th, 2007

EFF Sues For Release of NSL Abuse Records

Joe Lewis, WebProNews

On the heels of Congressional hearings and extensive media coverage of a Justice Department report documenting abuse of privacy measures, the Electronic Frontier Foundation is seeking an emergency order that would require the FBI to surrender and make public all records regarding the misuse of National Security Letters (NSLs) to collect private information from American citizens...

"Congress has already dedicated several hearings to the FBI's abuse of investigative power and is thinking about how to prevent such abuses in the future," said EFF Staff Attorney Marcia Hofmann.

"But if there is going to be meaningful debate about this issue, we need more information than what the Administration chooses to make public, and we need it now."

[Permalink]

April 13th, 2007

Higher digital music prices not a good deal

Brian Garrity, Reuters

Four years ago when Apple launched the iTunes Music Store, the company preached the good news of an easy-to-understand pricing structure for consumers: all tracks at 99 cents, most albums for $9.99...

In Apple's case, critics like Peter Eckersley of the Electronic Frontier Foundation contend that consumers actually are getting a raw deal by being charged a 30% premium to effectively buy back their rights. And while audio quality is improved, it still doesn't match CD quality.

[Permalink]

April 12th, 2007

Utah vs. Google: Trademark Debates Heat Up

Joe Lewis, WebProNews

The Utah State Legislature has passed a bill that would make it illegal to purchase keywords relating to a competitor's product in order to show up alongside them in search results. The Trademark Protection Act has come under much public scrutiny, most notably by Google...

As if the mounting case against the Constitutionality of the bill weren't bad enough for Utah, now the Electronic Frontier Foundation is involved.

[Permalink]

April 12th, 2007

Google vs. Utah: State takes flak for its attempts to police Web

Linda Fantin and Glen Warchol, Salt Lake Tribune

Corynne McSherry is an attorney with the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)...

McSherry says Utah's new law poses a serious problem for the state, noting the EFF probably would support a lawsuit. Keying off a trademark to give consumers information about competitive products is fair use and protected under federal trademark law, she says.

"If it weren't, we wouldn't have the Pepsi Challenge, Apple wouldn't be able to make fun of Microsoft on national television every night, and Burger King wouldn't be able to put up a billboard next to a McDonald's," McSherry says.

"If I were a Utah taxpayer, I would wonder why my representative wanted to vote for a bill that hurts me as a consumer and one the state's own counsel said is unconstitutional."

[Permalink]

April 12th, 2007

EFF takes up arms against Euro copyright move

Lucy Sherriff, The Register

The European wing of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has taken on the might of the European Commission by beginning its opposition to IPRED2, the proposed new directive that aims to harmonise European copyright laws...

Their new site says: IPRED2's new crime of "aiding, abetting and inciting" infringement again takes aim at innovators, including open source coders, media-sharing sites like YouTube, and ISPs that refuse to block P2P services.

[Permalink]

April 11th, 2007

FBI Gets Six Years for FOIA Request

Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post

The oldest reported Freedom of Information Act request in the federal government resides at the Justice Department and is 18 years old -- or, as the National Security Archive, a research group that tracks these things, likes to say, "old enough to enlist in the Army and go to Iraq."

So perhaps it should be no surprise that the FBI has just told a federal court that it will need until 2013 to process a request for information from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy organization.

[Permalink]

April 11th, 2007

National Security Letters Back in the Spotlight

Luke O'Brien, Wired News

The FBI's controversial use of National Security Letters to illegally obtain phone, email and banking records of American citizens will be under the microscope again today as an NSL recipient testifies in front of Congress about his experience...

In related news, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has sued the Justice Department to force the FBI to release all records concerning the illegal use of NSLs. The EFF claims the FBI is dragging its feet and has failed to meet a 20-day timeline set by Congress.

[Permalink]

April 10th, 2007

Students sue antiplagiarism website for rights to their homework

Ben Arnoldy, Christian Science Monitor

In a table-turning episode in the digital copyright wars, four teenagers are suing a business for allegedly trampling on their copyrights. Their product: homework...

"There are a lot of businesses that depend on making [digital] copies in order to index, or make things searchable, or create filters, or [perform] matching. All of these kinds of things today are valuable and in high demand," says Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "You'll see a lot more cases involving indexing copy."

[Permalink]

April 10th, 2007

A "new kind of identity theft": Utah bans keyword advertising by rival firms

Nate Anderson, Ars technica

Utah is best known for snow, salt, and Mormons, but the state also has a large business community that has no plans to keep turning the other cheek when it comes to keyword advertising...

This entire issue is really just the extension of comparative advertising into a new medium. As the EFF points out, this sort of thing has been legal in the off-line world for decades. "Comparative advertising uses those shorthand terms to provide more information about the trademarked product and competitive products," says Corynne McSherry."That's why comparative trademark use is clearly protected under federal trademark law. If it weren't, Pepsi wouldn't be able to tell consumers that more people think Pepsi tastes better than Coke, and Apple wouldn't be able to make fun of Microsoft on national television every night."

[Permalink]

April 10th, 2007

Just An Online Minute... Utah, Land Of Dumb Internet Laws?

Wendy Davis, MediaPost

Utah has quietly passed a new law that aims to regulate search advertising by prohibiting marketers from bidding to appear as sponsored links when people search for names of their rivals. For instance, the law would ban Dell Computer from bidding to appear as a paid search ad when search users query on the term IBM...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation and others have come out strongly in favor of allowing trademarks to trigger paid search links, arguing that such ads benefit consumers.

[Permalink]

April 9th, 2007

Can Data Have a Life After a Death?

Stanley P. Jaskiewicz, Law.com

Everyone who has worked with a computer, even before the arrival of the Internet, knows the sickening feeling of loss. Without warning, hours of your work suddenly vanish from the screen...

According to Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the practical solution recommended by the Army memo -- "to make explicit plans ahead of time to grant or deny access to their private e-mail accounts -- whether that involves handing passwords to a trusted friend or loved one, leaving word with their families that they would like the privacy of their e-mail respected even after death, or any number of other options" is "good advice for soldiers and their families, but it applies to everyone with an e-mail account."

[Permalink]

April 9th, 2007

RIAA and movie industry want to pretext

Nick Farrell, The Inquirer

The RIAA and the movie industry are lobbying lawmakers in a bid to get it excused from tough laws on pretexting...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said that if the RIAA gets away with its changes it will create a loophole which is so big that nobody else has to follow the law either.

[Permalink]

April 9th, 2007

Sites uncover online dating web of lies

Jessica Yadegaran, Contra Costa Times

Beware of Gregory from Oakland. He is not single. Rather, he is married, and cheats on his wife Saturday nights before church, no less. Not only that, but "he dyes his hair and lies about his age," according to a post by his anonymous ex-girlfriend on Dontdatehimgirl.com...

Some men have pursued legal action, with no success.

"The soap box is not liable for what the speaker says," explains Kurt Opsahl, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, citing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Passed in 1996, it protects Web site owners from content posted by third parties.

The speaker, however, still remains liable. Even an anonymous defamer can be tracked down through his or her IP address, Opsahl says.

[Permalink]

April 7th, 2007

MarketWatch writer leaves amid conflict report

Mark Boslet, San Jose Mercury News

The blogosphere has been called the Wild West of the 21st century, a free-wheeling panoply of information from sources trustworthy and not...

"The blogosphere has a relatively unregulated context, and I think that is a good thing," said Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "Readers have to become critical consumers of information."

[Permalink]

April 7th, 2007

Music and movie piracy hunters go after privacy law

Dawn C. Chmielewski and Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles Times

The music and movie industries are lobbying state legislators for permission to deceive when pursuing suspected music pirates...

"I don't see why the recording industry shouldn't have to follow the same laws that everyone else follows," said Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights advocacy group in San Francisco. "It appears they want to make the loophole so big that nobody else has to follow the law, either."

[Permalink]

April 5th, 2007

Protecting Your College From Patent Lawsuits Over Technology

The Chronicle of Higher Education

Companies are being granted what critics call overly broad patents on common technologies that colleges use. The companies are attempting to enforce the patents - by demanding the payment of royalties - on such routine activities as streaming videos online and administering tests over the Internet...

Jason Schultz, a lawyer and advocate for liberal rights in cyberspace, will answer your questions about patent law, what colleges should be concerned about, and how colleges can protect themselves from lawsuits.

[Permalink]

April 5th, 2007

Utah Ban On Trademarked Keywords Rankles Groups

Thomas Claburn, InformationWeek

Utah last month enacted Utah SB 236, the "Trademark Protection Act," a law that effectively prohibits the competitive use of trademarked terms as keyword advertising triggers...

"Aside from its constitutional flaws, the law is just bad public policy," said Corynne McSherry, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in a recent blog post. "It undermines the fundamental purpose of trademarks: to improve consumer access to accurate information about goods and services."

[Permalink]

April 4th, 2007

Utah Law Bans Competitor Keyword Bids

David Utter, WebProNews

The Utah State Legislature has passed a Trademark Protection Act that creates a new type of mark called an electronic registration mark; it probably will not survive a Constitutional test according to the state's own general counsel...

Banning such competitor trademark usage would undermine legally permitted comparative advertising, according to the EFF's Corynne McSherry. "That's why comparative trademark use is clearly protected under federal trademark law. If it weren't, Pepsi wouldn't be able to tell consumers that more people think Pepsi tastes better than Coke," she wrote.

[Permalink]

April 3rd, 2007

DRM activists hail EMI Apple deal

Shaun Nichols, IT Week

Digital rights groups have reacted with cautious optimism after EMI announced that it had struck a deal with Apple to distribute its titles in the iTunes Music Store without digital rights management (DRM) technology.

"Certainly this is a step in the right direction," Derek Slater, activism coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told vnunet.com. "It is long past time that the record labels opened up."

[Permalink]

April 2nd, 2007

Google to sell EchoStar satellite TV ads

Michael Liedke, Associated Press

Google Inc. will sell and select some of the ads shown to EchoStar Communications Corp.'s 13.1 million satellite TV subscribers, marking the online search leader's latest effort to extend its marketing muscle beyond the Internet...

The privacy controls built into Google's TV advertising system will depend largely on how well EchoStar shields the data collected from its set-top boxes, said Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an online civil liberties watchdog.

"The more you aggregate the data, the less troubling it becomes" from a privacy rights perspective, Opsahl said.

[Permalink]

April 2nd, 2007

Jobs Unlikely to Push for Lift of Video DRM

Nancy Gohring, PC World

Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs may be pushing for music labels to lift copyright protection on digital music but he doesn't appear so eager to do the same for video content, despite his position as the largest shareholder in Walt Disney...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is another group that has been pushing the music and video industries to drop DRM. While the EMI announcement is a step in the right direction, "why shouldn't this apply to video sold in the iTunes video store? It seems the basic reason for removing DRM should apply there too," said Derek Slater, activism coordinator for EFF.

[Permalink]

April 1st, 2007

New rules have passport lines out the door

Suzanne Bohan, San Mateo County Times

Corinne Monge likes to travel to Mexico, but has an expired passport...

When she gets her new document in several weeks, she'll be joining the ranks of Americans carrying ultra secure passports, complete with embedded chips, aimed at foiling attempts by terrorists and others with criminal intent from gaining entry into the country...

Privacy advocates such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation fear that anyone with strong intent to read travelers' digital information could devise a system to do so.

[Permalink]

March 30th, 2007

Hollywood copes with tech frets

Ben Fritz, Variety

Nearly five years after the launch of iTunes, music execs are in more of a panic than ever. Due in part to online file-sharing and casual sharing of burned CDs among friends, album sales fell 20% this year and digital downloads, while growing, aren't nearly enough to make up the difference...

"DRM is not only useless against piracy, but it's counter-productive because it gives otherwise legitimate consumers one more reason to prefer the illegitimate copy," says Fred von Lohman, senior intellectual property attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and a prominent DRM critic.

[Permalink]

March 30th, 2007

Adult site's legal battle could aid Web hosting services

Anne Broache, CNET

A federal appeals court ruling in a case involving an adult publisher appears to have delivered broader legal protections for online service providers against lawsuits claiming privacy violations and other illicit behavior by their users...

"This is a very important decision for anyone who runs an online business where you handle other peoples' content, whether it be people who create photos or artwork or anything or whether it's users who log in and upload stuff and comment on things," said Jason Schultz, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has filed briefs supporting Google's arguments against Perfect 10.

[Permalink]

March 28th, 2007

Cuban, EFF lawyer spar over YouTube and the DMCA at EFF Pioneer Awards

Nate Anderson, Ars technica

Wearing jeans, sneakers, and a T-shirt that read "I'd rather be fighting the man," Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban last night defended his view that YouTube is eroding support for copyrights and that its actions should not qualify for "safe harbor" under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA)...

The occasion for the remarks was the EFF's annual "Pioneer Awards," which were this year handed out at the ETech conference in San Diego.

[Permalink]

March 28th, 2007

EFF Pioneer Awards: And the winners are ...

Wendy M. Grossman, The Register

Computer rights activist and science fiction writer Cory Doctorow, security expert Bruce Schneier, and Yale law professor Yochai Benkler are the latest to be given Pioneer Awards by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The 16th annual awards were handed out last night at the Emerging Technology conference in San Diego.

[Permalink]

March 27th, 2007

Brussels downbeat on US passenger snoop plan

Mark Ballard, The Register

Transatlantic talks over the US grab for European personal data in its war on terror are floundering, the European Parliament heard yesterday...

Some members of the European Parliament, meanwhile expect that the PNR agreement will be made redundant by the Open Skies agreement for air transport, which is due to be signed in Washington on 30 April. Open Skies contains security provisions that experts at the Electronic Frontier Foundation fear might provide a legal basis for PNR and other US collations of European personal data such as its Automated Targeting System, which builds database profiles of people on its controversial watch-lists.

[Permalink]

March 26th, 2007

www.publicradio.org/columns/futuretense/2007/03/26.shtml

Audio: "EFF honors pioneers of the digital age" Jon Gordon, NPR: Future Tense

Tomorrow night, the Electronic Frontier Foundation hands out its annual Pioneer Awards...

Receiving the award tonight are security expert Bruce Schneier, writer and activist Cory Doctorow, and Yale Law School professor Yochai Benkler.

[Permalink]

March 23rd, 2007

MoveOn.org files suit against Viacom over online video

Joe Garofoli, San Francisco Chronicle

The continuing war over who controls content on the Internet continued Thursday with reaction to a federal lawsuit by the Internet political group Move-On.org against media behemoth Viacom that opposes the removal of an online video parody of a television parody...

"Sure, it's a funny video, but there's a serious side to this," said Corynne McSherry, a staff attorney with Electronic Frontier Foundation. "We hope that content owners should think twice before they order material taken down. And we want people to know that they have options when something they post to YouTube gets taken down."

[Permalink]

March 23rd, 2007

Lime's Gorton Trades Fast, Fights Suit, Seeks Car-Free Utopia

Lisa Kassenaar, Bloomberg

Step off the elevator into Lime Group's offices atop an 11-story brick building in New York's Chinatown into a crowd of more than 60 stone Buddhas and Asian lions, all handpicked by the company's founder, Mark Gorton...

"He's a classic entrepreneur,'' says Fred von Lohmann, an intellectual property attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit group based in San Francisco. "He has a lot of businesses going at the same time, and if they don't work out, he'll start three more.''

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

Viacom sued over Colbert parody on YouTube

Elinor Mills, CNET

Viacom is misusing U.S. copyright law by forcing YouTube to remove a parody video of The Colbert Report, according to a lawsuit filed against the media conglomerate Thursday...

"If you watch this clip for 10 seconds it is clear that it's a parody and it is fair use," said Corynne McSherry, staff attorney at the EFF, which is working on the case with Stanford University's Center for Internet and Society.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

COPA Online Porn Law Struck Down

Lisa Vaas, eWeek

A federal court judge on March 22 struck down the Child Online Protection Act (PDF), saying it violates the First and Fifth Amendments and is "impermissibly broad and over-vague"...

The March 22 ruling is a victory for the American Civil Liberties Union, which had brought the suit against the government along with plaintiffs that included online sex health sites, San Francisco poet laureate Lawrence Ferlinghetti and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=5140715

Video: "Recording Industry Targets UC Downloaders" Wayne Freedman, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

Despite efforts by the music industry, it says it is losing $2 billion dollars a year to file sharing pirates and many of them are college students doing it through servers provided by universities. Now, the record companies are clamping down on them, as well. It puts U.C. Berkeley, among others, in a tough position of trying to balance privacy while upholding the law...

This did not go over well at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, which defends the rights of cyberspace users.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

Viacom Sued for Colbert Takedown; NBC Takes Up with Fox

Natalie Finn, E! Online

Despite its ability to offer unlimited space for an infinite amount of creative material, the Internet sure seems awfully crowded these days. With lawsuits, that is...

Viacom, the cable network's parent company, improperly asked YouTube to pull the spoof because the clips taken from the show were protected under federal copyright law's "fair use" provision, according to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

Inside Move: MoveOn sues Viacom

Ben Fritz, Variety

While Viacom is busy suing Google over videos that were just taken down from YouTube, MoveOn.org is suing the conglom over a video that just went back up...

EFF attorney Fred Von Lohman said the plaintiffs will continue to seek damages.

"If Fox News got 'The Daily Show' yanked one night because it used a Fox News clip and then the next day said 'oops, that was a mistake,' I don't think they'd be OK with that," he told Daily Variety.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

Parodies prompt laughs, lawsuits

Laura Parker, USA Today

Parodies of famous people and name brands are sparking an increasing number of lawsuits...

On Thursday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) asked a federal judge to protect the free-speech rights of MoveOn.org. The group's satirical film of The Colbert Report was removed from YouTube after a copyright complaint by Viacom, owners of Comedy Central, which produces the show.

The EFF last year persuaded a federal judge to protect the free-speech rights of Stuart Frankel, whom the creators of Barney had threatened to sue because his website pokes fun at the popular children's TV character.

[Permalink]

March 22nd, 2007

Music industry threatens student downloaders at UC

Ellen Lee, San Francisco Chronicle

The music industry has sent hundreds of threatening letters to college students across the nation, including dozens at UC Berkeley and UC Santa Cruz, as part of its campaign against illegal music downloading...

Corynne McSherry, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the latest campaign seems like little more than a scare tactic. "These letters are scary. The first impulse is, 'How do I make this go away?' " she said. "If their goal is to stop illegal file sharing, this is not a very effective way of doing it."

[Permalink]

March 18th, 2007

EFF calls for greater commitment against digital TV copy protection

Heise Online

Back in 2005, the Electric Frontier Foundation (EFF) voiced its concerned about the Digital Video Broadcasting Forum's (DVB Forum) standardization of Content Protection Copyright Management (DVB-CPCM). Now, the EFF has published a briefing paper reiterating the Foundation's concerns about the drawbacks of CPCM and complaining about the general support among lawmakers for Digital Rights Management (DRM). The foundation says that politicians are making it easy for the media industry to use DRM techniques as it sees fit, with criminal prosecutors even investigating cases in which DRM was cracked for legal purposes.

[Permalink]

March 16th, 2007

Victims fight back against DMCA abuse

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

DMCA takedown notices: sure, they provide an easy way for companies or individuals to get copyrighted information pulled from sites like YouTube, but what happens when the process is abused? The DMCA does require takedown notices to be made under threat of perjury, and damages are possible against those that abuse the takedown process by using it for frivolous or fraudulent purposes. The EFF has recently filed two cases against alleged DMCA abusers, and may be prepping a third against Viacom.

[Permalink]

March 16th, 2007

Trial could test digital media rights

Rick Merritt, EE Times

Trial begins Monday here for a civil suit that could become a test case on questions about what fair use rights systems makers and end users have with their digital media. The DVD Copy Control Association (DVD CCA) is suing Kaleidescape Inc., claiming the company's home servers violate in several ways a contract designed to protect DVDs from being copied...

"This is a case where what is essentially a cartel is stifling legitimate innovation where there is clear market demand and a technical capability," said Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney with the EFF.

[Permalink]

March 15th, 2007

La Fundaci?n Frontera Electr?nica, defensora de los ciberderechos, desembarca en Europa

El Pais

Por primera vez en su historia, la veterana organizaci?n prociberderechos Fundaci?n de la Frontera Electr?nica (EFF) ampl?a su radio de acci?n m?s all? de Estados Unidos y se establece en Bruselas. Erik Josefsson, un conocido activista contra las patentes de software, ser? la cara de la EFF europea. En su mira est?n las leyes de propiedad intelectual y la retenci?n de datos.

La misi?n de la EFF en Europa ser? "poner luz sobre lo que est? sucediendo en Bruselas y utilizar nuestra experiencia en el desarrollo de leyes y pol?ticas", explica Josefsson, quien afirma que, en ?reas como los derechos de autor o la televisi?n digital, "Estados Unidos ha vivido mucho tiempo bajo los efectos de una peligrosa legislaci?n basada en malas decisiones pol?ticas. Europa no deber?a cometer los mismos errores".

[Permalink]

March 15th, 2007

Critics to Google: Privacy, please

Alex Pham and Michelle Quinn, Chicago Tribune

Google Inc.'s memory is getting a little shorter. Just not short enough for some...

"There is more that could be done," Kurt Opsahl, staff attorney with privacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, said about Google's new policy. "It would be nice to see the window narrowed to a shorter time frame. The shorter the better."

[Permalink]

March 15th, 2007

DRM coming to a TV near you

Shaun Nichols, Vnunet.com

A cabal of TV studios and entertainment executives is planning to tighten the guidelines on digital video broadcasts, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)...

"The restrictions can be changed at the whim of the rights holder. It may be that today you can record your favourite programme and transfer it to DVD for long-term storage. But next week, you could be prevented from recording or archiving to DVD," said the EFF.

[Permalink]

March 15th, 2007

Google's Privacy Move: Not Nearly Good Enough

Preston Gralla, ComputerWorld

Google has finally made a move to protect people's search privacy -- but its actions don't go nearly far enough. Its decision to make search records anonymous after 18 to 24 months is barely a good enough first step...

Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco told Computerworld "We'd love to see a shorter retention period and more complete anonymization."

Bankston would like the policy extended to other Google services, such as Gmail.

[Permalink]

March 14th, 2007

Videos Pulled From Web Sites Draw Suits

Amanda Bronstad, National Law Journal

The creators of videos that have been improperly removed by YouTube and other Internet service providers after allegations of copyright violations are fighting back with a new breed of lawsuits...

Jason Schultz, staff attorney at the EFF, a nonprofit civil rights group based in San Francisco, said that he anticipated that more lawsuits will be filed in the coming year. "What you're seeing now is the growing conflict between how easy it is to censor someone using that law and the growth of what's being called user-generated content on the Internet," he said. "This conflict will generate some legal disputes within the year."

[Permalink]

March 14th, 2007

DVB broadcast flag will require government support, but may not get it

Nate Anderson, Ars Technica

The Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) consortium sets digital television transmission specs for much of the world, but in recent years the group has turned its attention to crafting something far more controversial: a broadcast flag...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is the only public-interest group that sat in on DVB's technical meetings over the last three years, and they recently sounded the alarm over the finalization of the Content Protection and Copy Management (CPCM) system.

[Permalink]

March 13th, 2007

Viacom suit may reshape copyright law

Elise Ackerman, San Jose Mercury News

The copyright lawsuit filed Tuesday by Viacom against Google and its YouTube subsidiary could end up rewriting one of the key laws of the Internet age: the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...

"Any ruling in the YouTube case is certain to have implications for companies like Yahoo and eBay, as well as smaller companies like Facebook and imeem," said Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "All of these companies rely on the exact same principles that YouTube does."

[Permalink]

March 12th, 2007

File-Sharing Lawsuit Worries Techies

Brian Deagon, Investor's Business Daily

Two years after winning the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case MGM vs. Grokster, the entertainment industry is back in court to settle a fight some fear could handcuff technology innovation...

"Putting courts in the business of redesigning software is a dangerous precedent to set," said Fred von Lohmann, senior attorney at Electronic Frontier Foundation. "Do we want a world where every new technology gets it own federal judge to sit in judgment over the next software update?"

[Permalink]

March 12th, 2007

Spying Too Secret For Your Court: AT&T, Gov Tell Ninth

Ryan Singel, Wired News

AT&T told an appeals court in a written brief Monday that the case against it for allegedly helping the government spy on its customers should be thrown out, because it cannot defend itself -- even by showing a signed order from the government -- without endangering national security...

The telecom giant and the government are appealing a June ruling in a federal district court that allowed the suit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against the telecom to proceed, despite the government's invocation of a powerful tool called the "states secrets privilege," which allows it to have civil cases dismissed when national secrets are involved.

[Permalink]

March 12th, 2007

Feds, AT&T: Eavesdropping Trial Would Reveal State Secrets

KTVU/AP

The federal government is urging an appeals court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging President Bush's domestic eavesdropping program, warning that disclosure of such activities could compromise national security...

The court filings on Friday are part of the government's appeal of U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker's decision last year to keep the Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit alive. Walker ruled that warrantless eavesdropping has been so widely reported that there appears to be no danger of spilling secrets.

[Permalink]

March 11th, 2007

Lighting a New Frontier

Josh Richman, Oakland Tribune

The Oakland Tribune reported on EFF's ground-breaking FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government Project, which seeks information through Freedom of Information Act about the government's expanding use of new technologies that invade Americans' privacy.

[Permalink]

March 10th, 2007

Foundation fights for right to information

Josh Richman, Contra Costa Times

Digital sunshine pours forth from an office near Washington's' Dupont Circle...

Technology's constant evolution makes it "all the more important that we be aggressive and establish our right to get information as soon as possible," FLAG Project Director David Sobel said. Wait any longer and "the information is likely to be obsolete by the time we get it.

"And when it comes to the government's capacity to engage in invasive conduct, I'm still surprised at what we find."

[Permalink]

March 9th, 2007

www.wboc.com/Global/story.asp?S=6202763&nav=QEMt

CBS/Associated Press

The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday...

Cindy Cohn, the legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the government, in general, needs to return to information gathering methods used prior to the Patriot Act.

The FBI must "limit these very powerful tools to situations in which the government is actually tracking suspected terrorists or spies," Cohn told CBS News Radio.

[Permalink]

March 8th, 2007

Record firms crack down on campuses

Hiawatha Bray, Boston Globe

The Recording Industry Association of America has opened one of its biggest assaults yet on illegal file swapping with warning letters to 13 colleges, including the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, asking them to identify on-campus file swappers who the industry intends to pursue for copyright violations...

"We think this is clearly, exactly the wrong direction to be taking," said Corynne McSherry, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Internet civil liberties group and vocal critic of the music industry's campaign. "It's very clear that illegal downloading is continuing apace and is doing just fine."

[Permalink]

March 8th, 2007

News-Press Allegedly Asks Google to Reveal Blog Commenter

Drew Mackie, Santa Barbara Independent

One presumably regular reader of BlogaBarbara - the online journal of Santa Barbara happenings kept by the pseudonymous Sara De La Guerra - would have checked the site yesterday and found a departure from the frequent musings on the internal happenings at the Santa Barbara News-Press: a warning directed specifically at himself or herself that Ampersand Publishing wants to know their name...

Corynne McSherry, an EFF staff attorney who describes the organization as "the ACLU of the internet," said standard procedure of the EFF in these kinds of cases is to demand the subpoenaing party to present just cause for the action in order to ensure that people aren't being exposed for petty reasons. "It's important to understand we're not saying that under no circumstances should you not be able to find out someone's identity if that person has genuinely defamed you... in a way that people would actually believe them," McSherry said. "If that's the case, then you may have a basis for legitimate claim to sue them in a court of law."

[Permalink]

March 7th, 2007

Proposed FAIR USE Act to Limit DMCA Restrictions

Tuan Nguyen, Daily Tech

Excessive restrictions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act may be a thing of the past if U.S. Representative Rick Boucher has his way...

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which has stood against the RIAA in many cases, the FAIR USE Act would help consumers who are being sued for wrong doing when they have not committed any crime. "The bill would loosen the grip of the DMCA, which restricts circumvention of digital rights management (DRM) restrictions even for lawful uses," said the EFF in a statement.

[Permalink]

March 7th, 2007

Microsoft vs. Google: More at Stake Than Books

Katherine Noyes, TechNewsWorld

Microsoft attorney Thomas Rubin on Tuesday accused Google of taking a "cavalier approach to copyright" and of using its Book Search project to make money off other people's copyrighted creations. His comments have stirred up a debate over the importance of free-market competition versus what is ethical when accessing information.

"My take is that there's something more at stake here than just a spat between Google and Microsoft," Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told the E-Commerce Times.

"The bigger question is whether or not you agree with Microsoft that only those who collaborate in advance with copyright holders should be able to innovate and build on the value of copyrighted works. This is ironic coming from a company that claims to be in the business of innovation," he noted.

[Permalink]

March 6th, 2007

Thread Control: Lessons from USA Today

Catherine Holahan, BusinessWeek.com

When USA Today's staff redesigned the online arm of the national newspaper, they included plenty of space for ordinary readers to "join the conversation"...

The job is somewhat easier online than in print, thanks to a section in the 1996 Communication Decency Act that shields owners of Web forums from the comments made in them. "In essence, Congress has said that the soapbox should not be held liable for what the speaker has said," says Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit public advocacy group focused on free speech online.

[Permalink]

March 6th, 2007

Microsoft's Accusations Against Google Don't Impress Copyright Gurus

Jessie Seyfer, The Recorder

Copyright experts scoffed Tuesday at attempts by a top Microsoft lawyer to discredit Google's approach to copyrighted material...

The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals is expected to rule on three related cases on that subject by the end of the summer, said Fred Von Lohmann, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco.

Von Lohmann said Rubin's speech, which played up the fact that Microsoft asks copyright holders' permission before using their works, highlighted a way of thinking that he finds highly disturbing. Seeking permission from movie studios and publishing houses before using their material for a new innovation might be something Microsoft -- with its resources -- can do easily, but small-time innovators can't, Von Lohmann said.

[Permalink]

March 5th, 2007

Furore after YouTube pulls line dance video

Shaun Nichols, vnunet.com

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has stepped in on behalf of an amateur video maker in a copyright case involving a popular line dance...

"Silver's claim of copyright infringement is absurd and is a classic example of the kind of Digital Millennium Copyright Act abuse that can chill internet speech," said EFF attorney Corynne McSherry.

"Even if Silver had a valid copyright in the dance, which is not at all clear, this is fair use and not infringing."

[Permalink]

March 2nd, 2007

Just An Online Minute... Dancing With Absurdity

Wendy Davis, MediaPost

Several weeks ago, Viacom famously demanded that YouTube purge a trove of clips from the site -- including some clips not actually owned by the media company, such as a group of friends having dinner at Somerville, Mass.-restaurant Redbones. As it turns out, Viacom isn't the only one to wrongly ask for clips' removal from YouTube. Richard Silver of Groton, Conn., self-described inventor of the "Electric Slide" dance steps, also recently demanded that YouTube take down a clip showing audience members at a concert performing the dance, according to a new lawsuit by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

February 28th, 2007

Suit demands details on secret court's wiretap ruling

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle

A privacy rights group sued the Justice Department on Tuesday to try to pry loose a ruling by a secret court that the Bush administration says approved its clandestine wiretapping program...

"While national security and law enforcement demand a limited amount of secrecy, Americans have the right to know the government's basic guidelines for this kind of invasive electronic surveillance of their personal communications,'' said David Sobel, a lawyer for the organization.

[Permalink]

February 28th, 2007

RIAA Sends Schools a P2P Heads Up

Roy Mark, InternetNews.com

In a new legal campaign launched today against illegal peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is offering college and university students a chance to settle before they get sued...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a longtime critic of the music industry's P2P lawsuits, quickly countered that the RIAA's campaign is doomed.

"It's not a particularly good strategy," Rebecca Jeschke, the EFF's media relations coordinator, told internetnews.com. "The kids will move on to other technologies."

[Permalink]

February 28th, 2007

Boucher DMCA Exemption Bill Would Legalize Commercial-Skipping

Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

A copy of the early draft language of the revised H.R. 1201, sponsored by Rep. Rick Boucher (D - VA) and introduced on the floor of the US House of Representatives yesterday, shows the revised legislation would add six new exemptions to US Code section 1201, which had been amended by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act...

For its part, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has come out in support of the bill, also as anticipated. "Technology companies play a game of Russian roulette whenever they create products with both infringing and non-infringing uses," an EFF statement reads this evening.

[Permalink]

February 27th, 2007

The Online-Video Takedown Smackdown

Catherine Holahan, BusinessWeek.com

Amateur filmmaker Matt Hawes thought his video spoof of MTV's The Real World was sufficiently funny to get noticed on YouTube...

EFF staff attorney Corynne McSherry says her organization has seen a recent surge in the number of cases, brought on behalf of people such as Hawes, involving misuse of the act's takedown procedure.

[Permalink]

February 27th, 2007

DoJ Sued For Release Of FISA Court Rules On Spy Program

KC Jones, InformationWeek

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has sued the Department of Justice, demanding the release of records related to court orders authorizing electronic surveillance...

In a statement announcing the lawsuit, EFF senior counsel David Sobel said that Americans have the right to know the government's basic guidelines for electronic surveillance of their personal communications. The government has claimed that ordinary Americans haven't been targeted and that only communications involving suspected terrorists have been intercepted.

[Permalink]

February 27th, 2007

Music executives judge Jobs, lament losses

Greg Sandoval, CNET

The discussions at a music conference here Tuesday started with an all-around bashing of Apple CEO Steve Jobs before moving to the plethora of issues plaguing the music industry...

In January, EMI said it was reviewing a request by the Electronic Frontier Foundation to allow reverse engineering of its digital rights management software. That EMI would even consider the proposal was seen in many circles as a step forward by the anti-DRM camp.

[Permalink]

February 27th, 2007

Tech forum questions if pretexting ban will work

Robert Mullins, InfoWorld

Obtaining private records under false pretenses is bad, but some in the technology industry say it happens all the time and wonder whether new federal legislation will curb "pretexting"...

Although some speakers at the summit criticized phone companies for not protecting call records well enough, another wondered how pretexting could be stopped.

"This has been happening for years," said Shari Steele, president of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

February 26th, 2007

San Francisco turns free Wi-Fi into long battle

Michelle Quinn and James S. Granelli, Los Angeles Times

In his October 2004 State of the City address, Mayor Gavin Newsom pledged to "not stop until every San Franciscan has access to free, wireless Internet service"...

But the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and other advocates raised concerns about EarthLink's privacy policy. They also complained that Google's ability to track the whereabouts of network users could prove irresistible to law enforcement (Google said people worried about such things could sign up using false names).

[Permalink]

February 26th, 2007

Google gets hand in trademark dispute

IT News

Previously critical of the search engine, the Electronic Frontier Foundation supports Google's argument that sponsored links do not constitute infringing uses of trademarks...

"The Internet has brought together speakers of many kinds -- some competing with trademark owners, others criticizing them, still others simply referring to them while discussing other subjects or products," EFF Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry said in a prepared statement. "Services like Google's 'sponsored links' help people with something to say reach those who might be interested in hearing it."

[Permalink]

February 23rd, 2007

Just An Online Minute... EFF: Trademark Search Buys Protect Free Speech

MediaPost

A federal appellate court is getting ready to decide whether Google's method of selling paid search ads violates trademark law...

With the case now pending in the Second Circuit, the civil rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation has gotten involved. In a friend-of-the-court brief filed this week, the EFF argues that there's more at stake than just competition between business rivals. The EFF makes the case that Google's policy of allowing people to purchase trademarked names also protects free speech rights.

[Permalink]

February 22nd, 2007

US judge orders domestic spying cases to proceed

Associated Press

U.S. officials failed to sideline dozens of domestic spying lawsuits on Tuesday as a federal judge ordered the war on terror-connected cases to proceed despite a pending appeal...

"The government wanted this case to be placed in the deep freeze and this decision is allowing it to move forward," EFF attorney Kurt Opsahl told AFP. "We are very pleased. Now, we have to come up with our targeted set of questions."

[Permalink]

February 22nd, 2007

AT&T Can Continue Hiding Surveillance Secrets

Megan Tady, The New Standard

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled Tuesday that evidence will remain sealed in the class-action lawsuit accusing AT&T of collaborating with the government to illegally spy on Americans' communications...

In a press statement, EFF expressed its disappointment in the judge's decision. "Given that the privacy of millions of Americans is at stake, we strongly believe that the public would benefit from seeing this evidence for themselves," said Cindy Cohn, EFF's legal director.

[Permalink]

February 21st, 2007

Google Seals Desktop XSS Hole

David Utter, SecurityProNews

A vulnerability in the Google Desktop product could have exposed files on a machine running it to an external attacker...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has had concerns about Google Desktop virtually since its inception. Those concerns escalated when version 3 of the software, with its 'Search Across Computers' feature, hit the Internet in February 2006.

[Permalink]

February 21st, 2007

Case against AT&T/NSA continues

ZDNet

A federal judge ruled that a class action lawsuit against AT&T over its participation in NSA spying can go forward, rejecting requests by the government and AT&T to freeze proceedings during an appeal, the Electronic Frontier Foundation says...

"We're disappointed that the court did not choose to unseal all of the documents that include or refer to the evidence presented by Mark Klein and our expert, J. Scott Marcus. The government has already agreed that the evidence is neither classified nor a state secret, and is only being held under seal because of AT&T's weak trade secrecy claims," said Cindy Cohn, EFF's Legal Director. "Given that the privacy of millions of Americans is at stake, we strongly believe that the public would benefit from seeing this evidence for themselves."

[Permalink]

February 21st, 2007

Federal judge lets discovery proceed in domestic spying class action lawsuit

Joshua Pantesco, JURIST

US District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker issued an order Tuesday imposing a limited stay on discovery in a class action lawsuit challenging the legality of the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program, despite the government's request to stay discovery pending the outcome of an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit...

Also on Tuesday, Judge Walker denied a media request to unseal documents filed in the case, including internal AT&T documents and a declaration from a retired AT&T telecommunications technician.

[Permalink]

February 19th, 2007

Steve Jobs Changes His Tune

Red Herring

Steve Jobs has talked the talk and now a growing chorus of critics is urging him to walk the walk...

Derek Slater, activist at the privacy rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, says Mr. Jobs could demonstrate that he is serious about abolishing copyright protection schemes by selling DRM-free music from independent artists on iTunes. "He should put his music store where his mouth is," says Mr. Slater. "That would be an important step."

[Permalink]

February 17th, 2007

Troops' blogs under scrutiny

Fred Reed, Washington Times

Once again, technology has outrun the laws we use to regulate it. Consider the Pentagon's current automated surveillance of troops' blogs. Is it necessary? Legal? Constitutional?..

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed suit, demanding details of the unit's operations.

In particular, the organization wants to know whether the military is censoring the opinions of troops, which would be a violation of the constitutional right to free speech.

[Permalink]

February 16th, 2007

EFF cries foul over YouTube takedowns

Shaun Nichols, IT Week

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has condemned Viacom's demand that YouTube remove 100,000 videos from its site because it believes that much of the material does not violate Viacom copyrights...

"If they are making these kinds of blatant mistakes, who can tell how many fair uses of Viacom content they also targeted in their 100,000 takedowns? Hundreds? Thousands?" said the EFF.

[Permalink]

February 16th, 2007

"Wiki can link to controversial documents, judge rules"

The Register

Drugs giant Eli Lilly has failed in its bid to restrict a wiki from linking to documents that could be damaging to its business. The ruling of a New York court said the court could not rule against the internet "in its various manifestations"...

"This ruling makes it clear that Eli Lilly cannot invoke any court orders in its futile efforts to censor these documents off the internet," said EFF staff attorney Fred von Lohmann. "We are disappointed, however, that the judge failed to appreciate that its previous orders constituted prior restraints in violation of the First Amendment."

[Permalink]

February 16th, 2007

Discovery Upset About Parody Spanking

David Utter, SecurityProNews

The Electronic Frontier Foundation sparred with Discovery Communications over the media company's efforts to silence a website that criticized a Discovery marketing campaign...

"Once again, a business is trying to use false legal claims to chill criticism," said EFF Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry. "Fortunately, more and more, the targets of these kinds of threats are fighting back."

[Permalink]

February 16th, 2007

For Your Eyes Only?

PBS Now

This week, NOW reports on new evidence suggesting the existence of a secret government program that intercepts millions of private e-mails each day in the name of terrorist surveillance... Featuring EFF Staff Attorney Kevin Bankson.

[Permalink]

February 16th, 2007

Just An Online Minute... EFF Reaches Out To Viacom Victims

Wendy Davis, MediaPost

The civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation appears to be mulling some sort of legal action against Viacom stemming from its recent demand that YouTube remove 100,000 clips - including clips with no connection to Viacom - from the site.

"Were You Caught in the Viacom Takedown?" the EFF asks in its own video, quietly uploaded to YouTube late last week. In the clip, the EFF says it wants to hear from any innocent parties caught in the recent dragnet. "If your video was taken down after complaints from Viacom, but contained either no viacom content at all, or fair use extracts, the Electronic Frontier Foundation would like to hear from you," the company wrote in comments posted with the clip - viewed nearly 9,000 times as of Friday morning.

[Permalink]

February 15th, 2007

Why is this man smiling?

Andy Ihnatko, Chicago Sun-Times

We're just a half a dozen weeks into 2007 and yet it's already turning out to be a banner year for startlingly weird announcements from tech CEOs...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation praises Jobs for taking such a clear public stand on the issue. But they (quite correctly) wonder why, if he's all gung-ho against DRM, Jobs doesn't allow independent labels that are already selling music on the iTunes Store to sell their wares unlocked and unprotected.

[Permalink]

February 15th, 2007

EFF takes Viacom to task over YouTube takedown

Greg Sandoval, CNET

A watchdog group is encouraging those wrongly accused of posting pirated Viacom material on YouTube to stand up to the giant conglomerate--even if it means a court fight...

EFF spokeswoman Rebecca Jeschke says lawyers in her organization want to make sure that Viacom didn't go after people with legitimate fair-use claims.

[Permalink]

February 15th, 2007

EFF takes Viacom to task over YouTube takedown

Greg Sandoval, CNET

A watchdog group is encouraging those wrongly accused of posting pirated Viacom material on YouTube to stand up to the giant conglomerate--even if it means a court fight...

EFF compared Viacom's actions to fishermen who cast a wide net and mistakenly trap a porpoise. The group suggested in a note on its Web site that some of those accused of copyright violations may need legal help.

"It may make more sense to go to court to assert your rights," EFF attorney Fred von Lohmann wrote on the organization's site.

[Permalink]

February 15th, 2007

MySpace suit dismissed by judge in Texas

Ellen Lee, San Francisco Chronicle

A Texas judge has dismissed a lawsuit against MySpace that had blamed the popular Web site for not establishing enough safeguards to protect underage users...

Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said that such rules could stifle the Internet.

"The soap box is not liable for what the speaker has said or done," he said. "These services could not exist in a world where the services were liable for what the user had done."

[Permalink]

February 14th, 2007

http://www.thephoenix.com/article_ektid33885.aspx

Clif Garboden, Boston Phoenix

The Phoenix newspapers and thePhoenix.com were major winners in this year's New England Press Association (NEPA) Better Newspaper Competition...

Other Boston first-place awards went to Mike Miliard (Social Issues Feature), and David S. Bernstein (Transportation Reporting). Milliard won for his feature on the emerging importance of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Bernstein for writing the truth behind the recent MBTA fare hike.

[Permalink]

February 14th, 2007

Judge puts case against Sprint in NSA suit on hold

Reuters

A U.S. judged issued an order on Wednesday putting on hold court proceedings against Sprint Nextel Corp. (S.N: Quote, Profile , Research), which faces a lawsuit claiming it helped the U.S. National Security Agency track international calls.

The stay order by U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker will put the lawsuit on hold pending an appellate review of the Hepting v. AT&T lawsuit in the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

[Permalink]

February 13th, 2007

I love freedom, and I love the EFF

Popgadget

The Popgadget masthead says that we embrace technology, and we're also quite the fans of freedom...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation was founded by some cool cats who recognized that computers and directories should be subject to the same Constitutional protections afforded to our homes and filing cabinets. The EFF has done quite a bit to help the technology minded, and we've all benefited from their legal pursuits to protect innovation, free speech, consumer rights, and privacy.

[Permalink]

February 13th, 2007

Judge says Internet documents fall outside injunctions' reach

Michael Muskal, Los Angeles Times

A federal judge in New York gave websites a partial victory by acknowledging today that when documents are published on the Internet they take on a life of their own, an existence that cannot be reversed by a court...

Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based group that works for digital rights, praised what he agreed was a split decision. The foundation represented an anonymous individual who was earlier barred by Weinstein from posting web links to the Zyprexa documents.

"My client is pleased because he is no longer part of the injunction," Von Lohmann said in a telephone interview. "The bad news is that others still are restrained and that the judge didn't decide this based on the 1st Amendment."

[Permalink]

February 13th, 2007

SCO Vs. Blogger

Daniel Lyons, Forbes.com

For three and a half years, a blogger named Pamela Jones has led a relentless online crusade against software maker SCO Group, posting thousands of articles bashing the company for suing IBM over the Linux operating system...

Other companies have taken legal action against bloggers only to have those actions backfire. In January, Apple was reportedly forced to pay $700,000 to cover the legal expenses of bloggers against whom it had tried to take legal action, thanks to the efforts of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco group that defends bloggers.

[Permalink]

February 13th, 2007

Rules For The Revolution Podcast

Colette Vogele

Jason is a staff attorney for the EFF specializing in intellectual property and reverse engineering. He currently leads EFF's Patent Busting Project and also teaches graduate classes on Cyberlaw at UC Berkeley's Boalt Hall School of Law and School of Information.

In this episode, Jason discusses the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (the "DMCA") and how podcasters and video bloggers are affected by this law enacted nearly 10 years ago.

[Permalink]

February 9th, 2007

MFPs anti-counterfeiting measures toughen up

Dan Littman, InfoWorld

Last time we tested similar MFP systems, we found that they adhered to federal anti-counterfeiting guidelines that recommended overlaying all color jobs with the machine's serial number, encoded in big yellow dots. The dots were almost invisible, but not quite... Of course, many anti-counterfeiting measures may never be known, in the interest of keeping those secrets out of criminals' hands. That inherent secrecy caught the eye of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which has concerns about some of the anti-counterfeiting measures and the practice of printing encoded information -- including those aforementioned yellow dots -- onto documents to identify the printer that created them.

[Permalink]

February 9th, 2007

Lactivist Gets Apology From Pork

Jason Lee Miller, WebProNews

"That'll do pig, that'll do," is how SEM-at-home mom and Lactivist Jennifer Laycock concluded her beef with the National Pork Board after receiving a heartfelt apology and the promise of a donation from to the Mother's Milk Bank of Ohio...

Bloggers, especially in the SEM community, were outraged by the threats in the "lawyer crafted nasty gram," and by one especially egregious accusation to be noted later, and rallied behind Laycock by blogging to everybody they knew, threatening a Google bomb if the National Pork Board didn't back off. And then, the Electronic Frontier Foundation stepped in on her behalf as well.

[Permalink]

February 9th, 2007

SF JUDGE WEIGHS 2 ISSUES IN SURVEILLANCE LAWSUITS

Bay City News

A federal judge who is presiding over more than 30 domestic surveillance lawsuits heard two hours of legal arguments by attorneys on two key procedural issues today but deferred ruling on them...

That lawsuit, known as the Hepting case, was filed against AT&T by four Californians represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

[Permalink]

February 8th, 2007

Judge To Decide Whether NSA Spy Suit Continues

KC Jones, InformationWeek

The Electronic Frontier Foundation will argue Friday that the lawsuits over the National Security Agency's spy program should proceed while the government asks a higher court to overturn a judge's decision to continue hearing the case.

At issue is whether the U.S. government was within the law to monitor domestic phone calls and other communication originating from parties outside the United States in an effort to quash terrorist activities. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has since said the Bush administration will reverse its stance on domestic spying.

[Permalink]

February 7th, 2007

US surveillance of soldiers' blogs sparks lawsuit

John Leyden, TheStreet.com

The US Army is being sued by a privacy group that wants the military to come clean about how it monitors websites and soldiers' blogs for potential military leaks...

"Soldiers should be free to blog their thoughts at this critical point in the national debate on the war in Iraq," EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann said. "If the Army is colouring or curtailing soldiers' published opinions, Americans need to know about that interference."

[Permalink]

February 7th, 2007

Soldiers' Blogs Monitored; Group Sues For More Info

KC Jones, InformationWeek

It's no secret that the military monitors soldiers' Web postings, can remove certain items, and will punish those posting content that violates military rules...

"Soldiers should be free to blog their thoughts at this critical point in the national debate on the war in Iraq," EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann said in a prepared statement. "If the Army is coloring or curtailing soldiers' published opinions, Americans need to know about that interference."

[Permalink]

February 6th, 2007

EFF to fight for digital rights in Europe

James Niccolai, InfoWorld

Consumers in Europe have another group looking out for their digital rights with the opening of a Brussels office by the U.S. nonprofit group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)...

Erik Josefsson will be the EFF's European Affairs Coordinator. He was previously the head of the Swedish chapter of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, which helped overturn the proposal for a unified patent system in Europe.

[Permalink]

February 5th, 2007

Privacy group sues Army over surveillance of soldiers' blogs, Web sites

Todd R. Weiss, ComputerWorld

A U.S. Army unit that monitors thousands of Web sites and soldiers' blogs looking for sensitive military information has been hit with a Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) lawsuit by a San Francisco-based privacy group that wants to know more about the monitoring program...

Marcia Hofmann, a Washington-based staff attorney for the EFF, said the FoIA lawsuit is aimed at protecting free speech and privacy and helping soldiers and other Americans understand how and why Web sites and soldiers' blogs are being monitored. "The idea is to get more information on what the Army is doing," Hofmann said. "Some soldier bloggers choose not to blog because of concerns about what they can and can't say" online.

[Permalink]

February 4th, 2007

TiVo sees if you skip those ads

David Lazarus, San Francisco Chronicle

TiVo revealed the other day that it's offering TV networks and ad agencies a chance to receive second-by- second data about which programs the company's 4.5 million subscribers are watching and, more importantly, which commercials people are skipping...

"It's a constant struggle to maintain your privacy in the modern era," said Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney at San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation. "We have entered an era in which more and more information about you is being collected and maintained."

[Permalink]

February 3rd, 2007

'Electric Slide' on slippery DMCA slope

Daniel Terdiman, CNET

The inventor of the "Electric Slide," an iconic dance created in 1976, is fighting back against what he believes are copyright violations and, more important, examples of bad dancing.

"Someone who performs it noncommercially or adds their own artistic flair to the dance has a pretty good fair-use argument that their performance is noninfringing," Schultz said.

[Permalink]

February 2nd, 2007

Data Privacy Bill Expected to Target Retailers, Banks

Brian Krebs, Washington Post

Data privacy is likely to be among the hottest technology issues to face Congress this year, in part due to interest from the new chairman of the House Financial Services Committee...

While some major corporations -- most recently Microsoft -- have expressed support for some kind of federal consumer privacy law to govern how companies can use, combine and trade consumer data, the effort to produce baseline privacy protections for consumers may set off contentious policy debates, said Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"The question with this issue -- as with others -- becomes, is this an area where dueling interest groups will make it difficult for Congress to come to an effective solution, or is it something that's moving so fast that anything Congress is likely to do will end up obsolete a year or two from now?" he said.

[Permalink]

February 1st, 2007

EFF demands evidence of US army blog censorshop

PC Pro

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Defense, demanding information on how it monitors soldiers' blogs.

Soldiers should be free to blog their thoughts at this critical point in the national debate on the war in Iraq,' said EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann. 'If the Army is colouring or curtailing soldiers' published opinions, Americans need to know about that interference.

[Permalink]

January 30th, 2007

FBI turns to broad new wiretap method

Declan McCullagh, CNET

The FBI appears to have adopted an invasive Internet surveillance technique that collects far more data on innocent Americans than previously has been disclosed...

"What they're doing is even worse than Carnivore," said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who attended the Stanford event. "What they're doing is intercepting everyone and then choosing their targets."

[Permalink]

January 26th, 2007

EFF tells radio station to back off blogger

Grant Gross, InfoWorld

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has come to the aid of a liberal blogger whose Web site was taken down after a radio station complained that critiques containing on-air clips violated its copyright...

The EFF threatened a lawsuit against ABC and KSFO if they further attempted to shut down Spocko with Digital Millennium Copyright Act threats. "ABC/KSFO's complaints amount to nothing more than an attempt to silence an effective critic," EFF lawyer Matt Zimmerman wrote. "EFF ... will vigorously defend Spocko against misguided efforts to limit his First Amendment rights."

[Permalink]

January 26th, 2007

Google and YouTube: A Catch-22

Catherine Holahan, Businessweek.com

Legal action from News Corp. concerning leaked episodes of the prime-time drama 24 has set the clock ticking for Google...

However, Google does have a quiet history of revealing information about users accused of copyright violations, says Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who has been involved with subpoena fights concerning Google and its users. Typically, von Lohmann says, Google gives users 20 days' notice and an opportunity to respond before handing over information. In YouTube's privacy policy, the company indicates it will release identifiable information that it believes is necessary to enforce its Terms of Use, which bans uploading copyrighted material, or protect itself against liability and "third-party claims or allegations," among other things.

[Permalink]

January 24th, 2007

Media outlets battle it out over free-speech rights

Martin Kasindorf, USA TODAY

In a dispute between the "new media" of the Internet and the "old media" of broadcasting, liberal bloggers and conservative talk-radio hosts are accusing each other of trampling the First Amendment's guarantees of free speech...

Matt Zimmerman, an EFF lawyer, says the first Web host surrendered too quickly to ABC's "saber-rattling." Spocko's use of the KSFO content comes "squarely" under federal law that protects "fair use" of copyrighted material for criticism and commentary, Zimmerman says.

[Permalink]

January 22nd, 2007

RIAA Lawsuit Against XM To Proceed

Erik Sass, Media Daily News

A U.S. district judge has allowed a major lawsuit brought by the recording industry against XM Satellite Radio to proceed...

In a May interview, Fred von Lohmann, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who practices digital copyright law, described the RIAA lawsuit as "a stretch." He thinks AHRA will ultimately protect XM: "The Audio Home Recording Act--which the lawsuit conspicuously fails to mention--gives XM and Sirius a pretty good defense. As far as I know, every one of these devices was designed to conform to the AHRA."

[Permalink]

January 22nd, 2007

Court Finds NJ Users Can Expect Privacy from ISPs

Associated Press

Computer users in New Jersey can expect that personal information they give their Internet service providers be treated as private, a state appellate court decided Monday in the first such case considered in the state...

Yes, this indicates that New Jersey, like a lot of states, is ahead of the curve on Internet privacy,'' said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based digital rights group.

Bankston also praised the decision for recognizing anonymity as a core free speech right.

[Permalink]

January 19th, 2007

Your Right to Time-Shift Is Under Attack

Eliot Van Buskirk, Wired News

The latest attempt by the recording industry to take away our right to time-shift (i.e. record and play later) digital audio streams recieved a boost today from U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts, who saw merit in the labels' claims that "XM directly infringes on their exclusive distribution rights by letting consumers record songs onto special receivers marketed as 'XM + MP3' players"...

Senator Diane Feinstein's re-introduced PERFORM Act would make digital recording products such as XM's and others yet to come illegal from the get-go, and would even bar legally-licensed online radio stations from streaming in the MP3 format. Luckily, the EFF is all over Feinstein about this, with a special page where you can let your own Senators know exactly how you feel about the PERFORM Act.

[Permalink]

January 18th, 2007

San Francisco expands public surveillance

Dan Goodin, The Register UK

In a controversial decision that pits civil libertarians against urban dwellers fed up with crime, San Francisco officials have agreed to almost double the number of surveillance cameras on city streets...

Several civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, argue there is no evidence that cameras deter crime. They pointed to statistics that showed an increase in illegal incidents at half of the locations where monitoring has been implemented. They also contend that such programs are open to abuse by crooked law enforcement members.

[Permalink]

January 18th, 2007

Proposed DRM legislation criticized as too harsh

Grant Gross, InfoWorld

Consumer rights groups have voiced opposition to legislation introduced in the U.S. Congress last week that would require Internet broadcasters to deploy DRM (digital rights management) technology to prevent listeners from making unauthorized copies of music files...

But the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Public Knowledge oppose the legislation. The bill would be a "backdoor assault on your right to record off the radio," the EFF said. The PERFORM Act would prohibit digital and satellite radio services from offering TiVO-like recording options, the EFF said.

[Permalink]

January 18th, 2007

WIPO Negotiators Try To Bear Down On Broadcasting Treaty

William New, Intellectual Property Watch

World Intellectual Property Organization officials negotiating this week on how to improve broadcasters' and cablecasters' ability to protect their signals have attempted to move into a deeper debate using an informal chair's text of a draft treaty...

The Electronic Frontier Foundation said the treaty raises fundamental questions for the rights of public and would restrict access to information in the public domain. Some broadcasters, such as from Japan, countered that absence of greater rights would weaken broadcasters and lead to less information and entertainment being made available to the public.

[Permalink]

January 17th, 2007

Leaked Documents Spur First-Amendment Debate

Snigdha Prakash, NPR

A federal judge in Brooklyn, N.Y., is considering whether bloggers are entitled to the same free-speech protections given to reporters for newspapers and other media. The case involves leaked documents belonging to the pharmaceutical giant, Eli Lilly.

Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco will argue that the order to shut down the Web links violated the protections of the First Amendment.

"Courts in the United States, thanks to the First Amendment, are not allowed to issue what are called 'prior restraints,' Von Lohmann said. "After all, the Pentagon Papers were also allegedly improperly obtained. And the courts have said over and over again, 'It doesn't matter if the documents were improperly obtained. Courts do not issue stop-the-presses orders against people who happen to get the documents after they had been released.'"

[Permalink]

January 15th, 2007

Documents Borne by Winds of Free Speech

Tom Zeller, Jr., New York Times

A showdown is scheduled for a federal courtroom in Brooklyn tomorrow afternoon, where words like "First Amendment" and "freedom of speech" and "prior restraint" are likely to mix seamlessly with references to "BitTorrent" and "Wiki"...

The case has attracted the attention of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the venerable digital rights group based in San Francisco, and one of its lawyers, Fred von Lohmann, who is now representing an anonymous Internet user caught up in the legal fracas.

"One of the core missions of the foundation's 16-year history has been to establish that when you go online, you take with you all the same civil rights with you had with you in prior media," said Mr. von Lohmann. "But of course, you need to fight for that principle."

[Permalink]

January 13th, 2007

www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/13/sanfrancisco_surveillance_cameras/

Civil rights groups slam San Francisco surveillance expansion Dan Goodin, The Register UK

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Northern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are spearheading opposition to a plan by the San Francisco Police Department to install 25 new surveillance cameras throughout the city.

[Permalink]

January 12th, 2007

Bill Would Force Webcasters' DRM Hand

Roy Mark, Internetnews.com

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein re-introduced Thursday her controversial legislation to mandate DRM formats for all streaming media services. A similar bill failed in the last session of Congress under pressure from consumer advocates and the electronics industry...

Both Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation led the fight to defeat the PERFORM Act in 2006, and Sohn predicted Feinstein may again find tough sledding since new Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) opposes technology standards.

[Permalink]

January 11th, 2007

Trying to censor blogger

Joe Garofoli, San Francisco Chronicle

A series of events involving a local liberal blogger, a San Francisco conservative radio station and the reaction of two of the larger corporate advertisers in the country -- Bank of America and MasterCard -- is revealing how slippery freedom of speech has become in the digital age...

"This is prototypical fair use of copyrighted material," said Matt Zimmerman, an attorney with the San Francisco civil liberties and digital privacy organization. EFF is not representing Spocko, but has reviewed his situation and is monitoring it. "Bloggers shouldn't have to be worried about being sued every time they post a screen shot from 'The Simpsons.' "

[Permalink]

January 11th, 2007

House Seat Hangs by a Byte

Kim Zetter, Wired News

As the 110th Congress settles into the Capitol building this month, one congressman won't be able to get too comfortable in his chair, with a controversy over the electronic voting machines that put him in office boiling down to a battle over the source code...

"The source code is available, yet there is no easy and ready way to get access to it or for someone to go in and look at the machine and challenge them," says Matt Zimmerman, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has joined Jennings in her dispute of the election through a separate lawsuit representing voters. "And now we're left trying to convince a court that it would be a really good idea to take a look at it."

[Permalink]

January 10th, 2007

Wiki Writer Goes to Court Over Freedom to Link

Shreema Mehta, The New Standard

An anonymous writer who linked from a collaborative website to a drug company's internal documents is appealing a court order demanding the removal of the links...

Preventing a citizen-journalist from posting links to important health information on a public wiki violates the First Amendment," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann in a press statement. "Eli Lilly's efforts to censor these documents off the Internet are particularly outrageous in light of the information reported by the New York Times, which suggests that doctors and patients who use Zyprexa need to know the information contained in those documents."

[Permalink]

January 9th, 2007

EFF Says First Amendment Protects Links To Leaked Corporate Documents

K.C. Jones, InformationWeek

An advocacy group claims the First Amendment allows citizen journalists to link from public Web pages to electronic copies of damaging internal documents...

"Preventing a citizen-journalist from posting links to important health information on a public wiki violates the First Amendment," EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann said in a prepared statement. "Eli Lilly's efforts to censor these documents off the Internet are particularly outrageous in light of the information reported by The New York Times, which suggests that doctors and patients who use Zyprexa need to know the information contained in those documents."

[Permalink]

January 9th, 2007

Blog Lands KSFO-AM In Hot Water With Advertisers

Joe Vazquez, CBS 5 (San Francisco)

At least two major corporations have pulled their advertisements from radio station KSFO-AM after bloggers publicized clips of broadcasts in which hosts took aim at politicians and a listener believed to be Muslim...

Matt Zimmerman with the Electronic Frontier Foundation said Spocko is well within his rights to post the audio clips, under a legal doctrine known as "Fair Use."

"If you are engaged in criticism or commentary or teaching -- those kinds of activities -- then it's acceptable to use copyrighted works to further those aims," Zimmerman said.

[Permalink]

January 8th, 2007

Video leads parade as old media and new media hook up

Jefferson Graham and Michelle Kessler, USA TODAY

A year ago, CBS President Leslie Moonves came to the Consumer Electronics Show to trumpet CBS' new video alliance with Google...

Many anti-piracy protections rob consumers of the right to legitimately use entertainment they've paid for, says Fred von Lohmann, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group.

For example, it's illegal to make a digital copy of a copy-protected DVD, even if it's just for backup, he says. And TV companies don't want consumers to be able to record a copy of a TV show on a DVR, then transfer it to another DVR or a portable device without paying a fee, he says.

[Permalink]

January 5th, 2007

Hacker: Blu-ray, HD DVD copy protection cracked

Robert McMillan, IDG News

A computer hacker claims to have broken the AACS (Advanced Access Content System) encryption specification used to control unauthorized copying on HD-DVD and Blu-ray video players...

By cracking AACS, Muslix64 may have violated the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which prohibits users from circumventing copy-protection tools without the permission of the copyright holder, said Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


Still, the software seems to have been written out of a legitimate sense of frustration with onerous copy-protection mechanisms, von Lohmann said. "He went out and bought a fancy new product that he thought would improve his experience and despite the fact that he's a legitimate buyer, it didn't work."

[Permalink]

January 5th, 2007

Face Recognition for Online Photo Searches Sparks Privacy Fears

Mason Inman, National Geographic

A new type of search engine using facial recognition technology could soon be able to pinpoint images of a person among the billions of photos posted online-even if their name does not appear...

Lee Tien is an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Internet watchdog group that focuses on privacy and civil liberties.

"Photos [posted online] are effectively anonymous now," Tien said, unless they are labeled with some sort if identifying text. "But if Polar Rose works the way they say it will, that's all going to change."

[Permalink]

January 5th, 2007

Experts say changes in e-voting likely to come

Grant Gross, ComputerWorld

Rules requiring independent audit mechanisms for electronic voting machines are likely coming, but the changes won't happen overnight, a group of advocates said Friday.

More than 18,000 undervotes in a still-disputed Florida congressional election from November show the need for independent audit mechanisms, said panelists at an event sponsored by several advocacy groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Common Cause.

[Permalink]

January 5th, 2007

The legal rights to your 'Second Life' avatar

Daniel Terdiman, CNET

A Second Life land developer has convinced YouTube to pull down an off-color video of her virtual self being harassed during an interview, raising novel questions about the legal rights of virtual-world participants...

To Jason Schultz, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the issues surrounding the DMCA complaint are pretty cut and dried.

"Since the general theory (in Second Life) is that you own what you create, she completely owns the copyright in her avatar," said Schultz. "But that said, she absolutely has no rights under fair use to stop people from taking screenshots or screen captures of her avatar in Second Life."

[Permalink]

January 4th, 2007

Signal-Based or Nothing, Some Say at US Broadcasting Treaty Roundtable

John T. Aquino, Intellectual Property Watch

At the 3 January roundtable discussion concerning the work at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) on a broadcasters' rights treaty, many of the more than 50 participants were vocal in their opposition, with some in support...

Gwen Hinze of the Electronic Frontier Foundation indicated that the draft proposal focuses on the rights of recording and intellectual property rights and urged the US delegation to pursue a signal-protection approach.

[Permalink]

January 3rd, 2007

Op-Ed: The Digital Give And Take

Derek Slater, Tom Paine

Many progressives are partying like it's 1992 in the wake of the November election. But when it comes to technology and civil liberties policy, the newly elected Congress presents both new opportunities and new challenges. The truth is, neither Democrats nor Republicans are universally good or bad across all digital rights issues...

That's just a sampling of technology and civil liberties issues likely to come up in 2007. For continuing updates on new legislation, check out EFF's blog and Action Center.

[Permalink]

January 3rd, 2007

When a Silicon Valley law firm dies, where do its records go?

Anne Broache, CNET

A prominent law firm that represented scores of Silicon Valley start-ups and venture capital firms in its heyday may have dissolved amid financial troubles a few years ago. But its records are poised to live on in digital form for years to come--and some former clients are raising questions about privacy implications...

Even so, requiring former clients to "opt out" rather than "opt in" doesn't seem quite right, said David Sobel, a senior counsel with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "A law firm's clients don't expect that their sensitive files will be made available to third-parties in this way, so they should not be given the burden of protecting their interests," he said in an e-mail interview.

[Permalink]

January 2nd, 2007

New Websites To Watch Out For

Erik Rosales, ABC 7 News (San Francisco)

Attorney Fred Von Lohmann, with San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation says video sharing sites are filling the gaps abandoned by Youtube, which since its inception, has banned nudity and allows users to flag content they feel is inappropriate.

Von Lohmann says sites that host user generated content are not required by law to monitor or even screen the material before it goes up.

[Permalink]

Subscribe to EFFector

[our free email newsletter]

(optional)
» EFFector Archive