Proposed Temporary Restraining Order

Cindy A. Cohn, Esq. (SBN 145997)
Wendy Seltzer, Esq.

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 436-9333 x108
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ONLINE POLICY GROUP

Jennifer Stisa Granick, Esq. (SBN 168423)
STANFORD LAW SCHOOL
CENTER FOR INTERNET & SOCIETY
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
Telephone: (650) 724-0014
Facsimile: (650) 723-4426

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
NELSON CHU PAVLOSKY and LUKE THOMAS SMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ONLINE POLICY GROUP, NELSON CHU PAVLOSKY, and LUKE THOMAS SMITH,
        Plaintiffs,
    v.
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, and DIEBOLD ELECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,
        Defendants.

 

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

 

No. __________

[Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction

Date:        November 4, 2003

Time:        9:00 a.m.
Courtroom:    ____

 

TO DEFENDANTS DIEBOLD:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT pending hearing on the Order to Show Cause,
scheduled for _______________, 2003, you, your servants, employees, and attorneys and all those
in active concert or participation with your or them
ARE HEREBY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED FROM:

1. Issuing or causing the issuance of legal threats to discourage or block publication
of any of the information contained in the Diebold e-mail archive. A true
and correct copy of the e-mail archive is attached hereto as Exhibit A
(“e-mail archive”).

2. Issuing or causing the issuance of legal threats to discourage or block the
Internet hosting of the information contained in the Diebold e-mail archive .

3. Issuing or causing the issuance of legal threats to discourage or block the
Internet hosting of links to the information contained in the Diebold e-mail archive.

This Temporary Restraining Order and all supporting pleadings and papers must be served
on Defendant no later than __________, and proof of service shall be filed
no later than one court day before the hearing on the preliminary injunction.

SO ORDERED.

DATE:___________________        ___________________________________

                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Subscribe to EFFector

[our free email newsletter]

(optional)
» EFFector Archive