Electronic Frontier Foundation
EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending
your rights in the digital world. » About Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Deeplinks Blog
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Shop
Home » Deeplinks Blog » August, 2005
  • Deeplinks Archives
    • October, 2011
    • September, 2011
    • August, 2011
    • July, 2011
    • June, 2011
    • May, 2011
    • April, 2011
    • March, 2011
    • More Archives
  • Blog Categories
    • Accessibility for the Reading Disabled
    • Analog Hole
    • Announcement
    • Anonymity
    • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
    • Bloggers' Rights
    • Broadcast Flag
    • Broadcasting Treaty
    • CALEA
    • Call To Action
    • CDA 230
    • Cell Tracking
    • Coders' Rights Project
    • Commentary
    • Copyright Trolls
    • Council of Europe
    • Criminalizing Content
    • Development Agenda
    • Digital Books
    • Digital Radio
    • Digital Rights Management
    • Digital Video
    • DMCA
    • DMCA Rulemaking
    • Do Not Track
    • E-Voting Rights
    • EFF Europe
    • EFF15
    • File Sharing
    • FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government
    • Free Speech
    • Free Trade Agreement of the Americas
    • Hollywood v. DVD
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • International Privacy Standards
    • Legal Analysis
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Locational Privacy
    • Mandatory Data Retention
    • miniLinks
    • National Security Letters
    • Net Neutrality
    • News Roundup
    • News Update
    • No Downtime for Free Speech Campaign
    • NSA Spying
    • Online Behavioral Tracking
    • Patents
    • PATRIOT Act
    • Pen Trap
    • Printers
    • Privacy
    • Real ID
    • RFID
    • Search Engines
    • Search Incident to Arrest
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Technical Analysis
    • Terms Of (Ab)Use
    • Test Your ISP
    • The COICA Internet Censorship and Copyright Bill
    • The Global Network Initiative
    • Transparency
    • Travel Screening
    • Trusted Computing
    • Video Games
    • Wikileaks
    • WIPO
August 24th, 2005
Email This Digg This Post this to Reddit Share this blog post with delicious Share this on Facebook Tweet this blog post Dent this blog post

The Broadcast Flag Cannot Be Fixed

Deeplink by Derek Slater

Yesterday, our colleagues at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) published recommendations [PDF] for Congress should it choose to reinstate the broadcast flag, which EFF and a coalition of organizations defeated in court. While we admire CDT's tortured attempt to make the broadcast flag seem reasonable, its suggestions are flawed. That was inevitable--the broadcast flag is fundamentally flawed policy and should be scrapped entirely.

The broadcast flag simply cannot satisfy its stated objective: preventing widespread distribution of digital television content. The "ordinary user" might not be able to get around the restrictions, but it only takes one skilled user [DOC] to put an unencrypted copy online and make it instantly available to everyone.

The flag will, however, chill technological innovation. While less draconian than the FCC's original ruling in certain ways, CDT's proposal ultimately gives the FCC and Hollywood broad veto power over innovation.

The flag will also create significant incompatibilities between devices, especially the millions of HDTV devices consumers have already purchased. CDT would have us throw away our current TVs at the behest of Hollywood in the futile fight against online downloading. In fact, CDT's only "recommendation" to address this problem is to educate consumers on exactly how much of their equipment to dump and repurchase under the new regime. EFF believes consumers deserve better than to be told "tough luck"--they deserve to be able to use digital television content on the device of their choice, including those they've already purchased.

Consumers also should be able to use content for non-infringing uses, such as playback on their laptop or mobile device. CDT's proposal only contains a limited exception for consumer use when it relates to "critical" news or public affairs; that's not enough.

Don't let Congress misinterpret CDT's waffling on the flag as a change to the public's position. Tell your representatives that this flawed policy should be junked, not "fixed."

See also Public Knowledge's official response.

Related Issues: Digital Video

[Permalink]

Donate to EFF
Make a One-Time Contribution
Join EFF
Become a Member

Subscribe to EFFector

EFF's Newsletter and Action Alerts

Headlines

  • Victory for Reader Privacy
  • The Humble Frozen Synapse Bundle
  • Don't Let Privacy Law Get Stuck in 1986
  • Open Source Security
  • 2011 Pioneer Awards!

Projects

  • Bloggers' Rights
  • Coders' Rights
  • FOIA Project
  • Follow EFF
  • Patent Busting
  • Surveillance Self-Defense
  • Teaching Copyright
  • Takedown Hall of Shame
  • TOSBack
  • Ways To Help
Want to learn how you can defend free speech, stand up for privacy, fight for government transparency, support consumer rights, and protect your right to innovation in the digital world? Visit http://eff.org/fight to find ways to help.
Creative Commons Licensed
  • Thanks
  • RSS Feeds
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact EFF